Posted on 07/12/2009 3:35:20 PM PDT by bocopar
Bill O'Reilly has called Free Republic a hate site and he may now have some ammunition to back up that assertion.
"A typical street whore." "A bunch of ghetto thugs." "Ghetto street trash." "Wonder when she will get her first abortion."At a time when the administration is seeking any reason to squelch any speech it deems "hate", as well as the entities where that speech may be found, what the hell were these people thinking?These are a small selection of some of the racially-charged comments posted to the conservative 'Free Republic' blog Thursday, aimed at U.S. President Barack Obama's 11-year-old daughter Malia after she was photographed wearing a t-shirt with a peace sign on the front.
The thread was accompanied by a photo of Michelle Obama speaking to Malia that featured the caption, "To entertain her daughter, Michelle Obama loves to make monkey sounds."
(Excerpt) Read more at black-and-right.com ...
Great reply - thanks for the comment.
I read somewhere that it is her first cousin. I don't know for sure though. I think we (taxpayers) paid for the entire family to vacation with the Obamas from the looks of the photos.
And Sarah Palin had to cut a check for $8,000 to the state of Alaska because she took her kids to a couple of official state functions. Makes me sick.
LOL.............Your cute.
So, Kos kids were ready to pounce from the get go?
I’ve several of my ZOT kitty images all ready ... some used before ...
If this guy doesn’t look like a thug, who does? He’s wearing sweats and jewelry! I’m not kidding: who looks like a thug if this guy doesn’t?
...ps. some of those ‘other’ people/groups think of this as a blog ...
“Cracker”.
That reminds me of a recent column I wrote and posted here about the “crackers” who cracked into a government database. I specifically used the accurate term “cracker” because I was once corrected by an IT specialist who told me that the commonly used term “hacker” was commonly used incorrectly (”crackers” do bad things, “hackers” find security holes for the good guys).
Despite the many times I tried to explain the correct usage of the term, the original topic was quickly lost and I instantly became the racist.
Let’s see if I can keep it simple for you.
Picture of President’s Eleven Year Old Daughter in Clothing You Think Is Inappropriate.
Allowable response: “Oh my that is certainly no way for a child to dress, what were her parent’s thinking. That just looks so trashy and she is such a sweet looking girl. It really is a shame she does not have better guidance.”
Wrong response: “look at the crude word for a person paid for sexual behavior she should be taken out and given the extreme penalty extracted in some Muslim countries for females who engage in illicit sexual behavior.”
See the difference. One is about the clothing not the person.
President’s child is dancing the Rhumba naked down main street.
Proper response: Someone get the poor child a coat, obviously she is so happy she clean forgot where she is.”
Wrong response: I think I can get this uploaded on my black berry before Secret Service is on to me.
There is no free speech here. Jim clearly lays out what this site is about. If you came out and blasted a freeper and claimed how you loved men, Obama, Marx and enjoy spending days dressed in pink bunny outfits you will likely get banned.
I love anything kitty. I’m a youtube kitty fan.
Yes. I did read the headline. And if we don’t combat this ourselves we will LET ourselves be indicted because we allow THEM to set the rules.
And that is wrong.
I am NOT arguing AGAINST Freedom of Speech.
I am NOT arguing FOR political correctness.
I am NOT saying we should allow others especially liberals, to define our vocabulary and lexicon.
But I AM saying that we know right from wrong, and shouldn’t allow something to pass that is OBVIOUSLY wrong. I think I saw those posts the other day that were referenced, and was in a hurry so I let it pass. That is MY issue to deal with.
But I say we must leave it to Liberals to use the moral relativism defense. They think that having someone defecate on a burning American flag is okay because it is freedom of speech.
As conservatives, we can opine that it is not okay to defecate on a burning American flag, but that it IS freedom of speech.
We can make the distinction that simply because something is protected under the law does not make it RIGHT. Liberals either cannot, or will concede or maintain that only when it is politically advantageous to do so.
And so it is with the comments we occasionally see in this forum. They may be protected free speech, but they are not right, and it is up to us as patrons and participants of this site to set the tone.
Too many signups since OCtober 2008.
We got trolled.
We need more mods, perhaps?? More watching eyes?
I thought my question was respectful and reasonable. I have been on this site for a few years and have mainly posted humorous comments- but not always. I feel somewhat like Joe the Plumber. It didn’t take you long to check up on me. I have two accounts because I didn’t like my first username. I don’t believe I have posted using the first one for quite a while. I guess you could check again. If this is grounds for expulsion, well, I ‘ll certainly miss posting here, but so be it.
I’m not a fashion expert, but I doubt these “peace symbol” t-shirts were entirely appropriate for an official state mission to Europe. Might as well be carrying a “Nuke America” sign.
As it turns out, that’s pretty much what Obama did at the summit.
I’d like to know who they were and what their posting history, if any, is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.