Skip to comments.Michelle Obama: Looking good
Posted on 07/20/2009 7:42:02 AM PDT by IbJensen
Was that a $5,000 VBH alligator clutch that Michelle Obama was carrying in Italy? So the company bragged, absolutely certain it was theirs, until the White House responded that it was not the alligator but the patent, an $875 VBH clutch and not the more expensive model.
To be honest, I didn't even know what VBH was until I saw the headlines about the $5,000 one Michelle wasn't carrying. I love handbags as much as the next girl, but I could never get my head around the idea of spending that kind of money on something that is bound to end up with ink stains. But if Michelle wants to spend hers, more power to her. If she wants to wear $540 sneakers (Lanvin, a ''cult'' item that is bound to end up in one of my local resale stores), I say go for it.
She is not going to solve the recession by wearing Keds. She wears enough clothes from Gap and J.Crew to make the point that looking great doesn't have to be über-expensive (although the things she manages to find at those places never seem to be there when I am), and that half the fun of fashion is figuring out how to copy high-style for less.
What Michelle Obama projects, with her bright colors, body-conscious clothes and keen sense of style, is a woman at her best, looking great, feeling great, being great, full of life, celebrating her country and her family and, yes, herself. The White House was quick to say the bag didn't cost $5,000, but it was still what my mother would have called a very, very good bag, and the first lady didn't apologize for that. Why should she?
She's not 22. She's a grown woman who hasn't faded to beige or placed herself in the background, who isn't embarrassed that she doesn't look 17, who (by all reports) doesn't hate her hips or hide her rear or ask whether the dress makes her look fat before she lets herself like it.
If that isn't a role model, what is?
The other day, I ran into a woman I know who has done very well professionally. I hadn't seen her in a while, and somehow I was taken aback. She looked the way she always had, only worse. I laugh when I see young women trying so (too) hard, because the truth is that when you're young, it's easy. The woman I ran into got to where she is, at least in part, by not getting trapped by the beauty thing.
On the other hand, she was long past the point where she needed to use or hide her sexuality. Now middle-age, she's become one of those women that other women can't look at for five minutes without wanting to do a makeover and wondering why she hasn't. Is she really happy this way? More power to her, but I want younger women to know it doesn't have to be that way.
Michelle is middle-age, too. You can be powerful and beautiful. You can be passionate about politics and clutch bags; you can do your best for your country and look your best while you do. You deserve the sneakers -- if not the Lanvin ones, then ones that make you feel just as good. And we should all ditch black for yellow. Especially in a recession.
A bag of bones, a shank of hair....
Michelle Obama, at her very best, is what Rodney Dangerfield call a “two bagger”. You wear a bag over your head in case the bag over her head breaks.
Wonder if Michelle is losing her hair from all the stress. Or if any of her children are getting molested my Alex Rodriguez at Yankee stadium. Or if she used any campaign money to buy clothes. Or if any of them were illegal gifts. Or if she bans books at home.....so many questions left unanswered.
Seriously, we have to have a BARF ALERT on this stuff...
To Estrich any woman would look good compared to herself.
Susan complements Michelle is a way no woman would ever want to be complemented.
Gee. Another adoring puff-piece on Aunt Esther. Throw it on the pile.
That’s a “triple bagger” — one for your head, one for hers and one for the dog so he doesn’t howl.
“... the first lady didn’t apologize for that. Why should she?”
Do the words taxpayer money mean anything?
Susan Estrich has not, either, gotten ‘trapped by the beauty thing.’ This is something to be proud of?
Susan Estrich is a woman? Who knew...?
She friggin looks like Mr. Ed. Wilbur, your horse is missing. Is she off on Air Horse one shopping again?
Please remember to add the barf alert. ;)
Susan Estrich writes about some other woman looking bad and needing a make-over? OMG
Ms. Estrich must have seen my tagline. :D
On whose nickel...?
We used to call it “Double-Coyote” ugly.
Coyote ugly is where you wake up with her asleep on your arm, and you chew your arm off to escape rather than wake her up.
Double-Coyote ugly is when you have escaped, you chew your other arm off, because you know she’ll be looking for a one-armed man.
If she wants to wear $540 sneakers (Lanvin, a ''cult'' item that is bound to end up in one of my local resale stores), I say go for it.And, as she's shown, those $540 sneakers are especially appropriate to wear while volunteering at a homeless shelter.
Don’t hate her because she’s beautiful.../s
On whose nickel...?
Honey, there aren't enough nickels in the world....
All true, but sometimes she looks good.
This "beauty thing" is something that Susan E. never has to worry about.
Isn’t MO an automatic barf alert??...:o)
Not gonna go there. Wouldn't be prudent!
Very rarely. And I wonder if she isn’t medicated on those days.
Our Loveliest First Lady.
Susan is trying to “dumb down” what looking good is. Makes her moments in front of the mirror less of a nightmare.
Yes to all.
If a Pubbie's missuz was sporting all this high end stuff, presstitutes would be all over who was paying how much for what.
“She is not going to solve the recession by wearing Keds.”
No, but since many of her subjects are struggling just to put food on the table, she could at least make the gesture to go for the less expensive items. After all, it’s those struggling subjects (taxpayers) who are footing the bill.
And what’s wrong with Keds? I’ve worn them. They’re comfortable. And they don’t cost $540.
Channel surfing the the other day the TV landed on Maxim’s 100 Hottest Women. I changed the Channel when they got to around 95 and Michelle Obama was named.
Junk in the trunk!
Her parents tied a pork chop around her neck just to get the dog to play with her.
“This “beauty thing” is something that Susan E. never has to worry about.”
I think what bothers me most about her is her ever present condescension toward anyone who does not agree with her. That and that awful voice.
I’ll bet you’d like to have that butt full of nickles.
Michelle is a yeti with a nice handbag.
Is the WH violating any ethics rules and/or tax laws?
Or is the First Lady for rent? Is she renting herself out as a human billboard? Which, if so, would be tacky in extremis.
Inquiring minds want to know :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.