Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh to take Jay Leno's 'Green Car Challenge'
The Hollywood Reporter ^ | September 18, 2009 | James Hibberd

Posted on 09/19/2009 4:38:49 AM PDT by iowamark

America, are you ready for Rush Limbaugh in an electric car?

The conservative talk show host has agreed to take Jay Leno's "Green Car Challenge."

In the segment airing next Thursday on NBC's "Jay Leno Show," Limbaugh will race an electric Ford Focus around a custom-built track beside Leno's studio, the show's representative confirmed.

The "Green Car Challenge" segment makes its debut on the primetime show tomorrow night. Celebrities who participate drive two times around the twisty track, which takes a little less than a minute to complete.

By the time Rush gets behind the wheel of the zero-emission vehicle, Bob Costas, Al Michaels and Drew Barrymore will have set times to beat.

Limbaugh is not a fan of hybrid and electric cars. Last March he criticized such vehicles -- including Ford's.

"Nobody's buying 'em. Nobody wants them. The manufacturers are making them in droves to satisfy Obama. ... People are going to buy [hybrids] because Obama's going to see to it the price [of gas] gets back up to four bucks, since that is the tipping point … Ford and Toyota are manufacturing all kinds of new hybrids to keep politicians happy. Politics. You want to know what killed the auto industry? Politics.”

Leno has been interested in getting more newsmakers on his new program than on "The Tonight Show." On his second night he welcomed Michael Moore into the studio.

The advertiser-friendly "Green Car Challenges" allows NBC to work product sponsorship into the program, though some critics have wondered whether the segment will also be entertaining.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: car; celebrity; challenge; electric; electriccar; focus; ford; fordfocus; fordmotor; green; greencar; greencarchallenge; greens; hollywood; hybrids; jayleno; jaylenoshow; leno; limbaugh; nbc; rush; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: reg45
Sorry Rush, some of us do like gasoline-electric hybrids. I have one - a 2007 Honda Accord Hybrid. It’s the best car I’ve ever owned.

I'll be happy to look at a hybrid when they save money as well as gas :)

41 posted on 09/19/2009 5:53:20 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
I see your point, but, going 75- 90 miles an hour in any car and get in a accident would be tragic and most likely fatal.
42 posted on 09/19/2009 5:53:53 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Furthermore, I would buy an electric car in a minute if it was fast, sporty and fun. I have a 5 mile drive to work over city streets, averaging 30 miles per hour. Even a 50 miles range would let me commute all week without plugging in.

This won’t work for most people, who have much longer commutes. As I said above, we need nuclear power plants and a delivery infrastructure before this can be widespread. But my unique conditions mean I could use an electric vehicle to commute in and if it was affordable, fast, sporty and fun, I would have no problem giving up my Chevy pickup for a fast, quiet, reliable alternative. No motor. No tranny. No clutch. These cars have to be dirt reliable, long lasting, and cheap to maintain.

Bring it on, I say. Just don’t FORCE people to buy them. That is where the lunatic fringe liberals and the communists like Obama go wrong. They don’t offer a choice, they issue commands.


43 posted on 09/19/2009 5:56:35 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 50... 49... 48...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

And keep in mind that coal is a lot “dirtier” than gasoline or diesel - it’s relatively easy to refine out sulfur-containing impurities from liquid fuels - you just boil them and do it by fractional distillation.

But cleaning up solids is a much bigger problem - so even the low-sulfur coals still contain a bunch more sulfur than gasoline (and that sulfur, after combustion, ends up a SO2 and SO3 which have to be scrubbed or emitted).


44 posted on 09/19/2009 5:58:54 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
You know those under powered vehicles with 3 cylinders ?
I wonder how they manage when they try to get on the highway with a tractor trailer coming up as they try merge into the right lane ? or left lane depending where the on ramp is ?
45 posted on 09/19/2009 5:59:47 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wastoute
They do cry about the coal power plants.
So ? if they get their way, and they want us to use these kinds of cars, just where are we going to get the needed electricity to power all these cars ?
Does anyone need to be a rocket scientist to figure out where this is all leading to ?
Also put into consideration that most people are hurting now financially.
Only the elitist will be able to afford to drive a car after they get all gas powered cars of the road... the peasant masses will be forced to use mass transportation or walk.
46 posted on 09/19/2009 6:04:42 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: reg45

I would use new technology if I can afford it, but, for everyone to be forced to is not productive.


47 posted on 09/19/2009 6:07:38 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

>>as they try merge into the right lane

Merging into traffic?? That’s sooooo 1970! Most people I see around here think that a cell phone in your hand gives you the right of way and that the cars going 20 mph faster will just find a way to go around or slow down.


48 posted on 09/19/2009 6:08:01 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Question O-thority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Stosh
For the n-millionth time, it?s not a freakin ?zero-emmision vehicle?

Bingo! If electric cars are green, zero-emmission machines, then so are incandescent light bulbs and air conditioners.

49 posted on 09/19/2009 6:08:50 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: reg45

“They concluded that hydrogen car will replace the gasoline for general use...”

Again, more fantasy until somebody comes up with a useful source of hydrogen. Right now, if you want levels of H2 sufficient to dent our transportation needs, you’ll get it from . . . petroleum. There’s a brilliant thought - convert oil to CO2 and H2, and burn the H2, instead of just burning the damn gasoline.

Hydrogen will become a major player, and solar will matter for things like transportation, when we learn to use the energy of sunlight to cleave water to hydrogen and oxygen (which could then be recombined to give water and electricity).

Photochemical (solar) cleavage of water is hypothetically possible, but it’s hellishly difficult to make the process practical. There are numerous researchers working on that technical problem - that’s where we need to put some serious funding.


50 posted on 09/19/2009 6:10:26 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

aha bump


51 posted on 09/19/2009 6:13:47 AM PDT by DollyCali (Don't tell GOD how big your storm is -- Tell the storm how B-I-G your God is!you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

Good opportunity for Rush to get his point across!


52 posted on 09/19/2009 6:14:27 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

NBC is gambling heavily on this format since it’s cheap to produce - gee, it’d be a shame for GE if it tanks, after spending a gazillion bucks to promote it endlessly.
/s


53 posted on 09/19/2009 6:15:35 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
If they can build a electric car where it can get at least 200 miles before you have to recharge it, and can recharge it in 15 mins, and make it affordable, then, I am all for it.
At this point in time, electric cars make good sense using it in city driving where you got stop and go traveling.
For long trips... not practical unless it can give you at least 200 miles.
Don't forget, no matter how much we come dependent on green machines, there will still be a need for lubrication that we get from petroleum... unless they can come up with some kind of way to reduce friction.
The Meannie Greenies can not overcome the law of physics.
No matter how you look at it, there will still be a need for the internal combustion engine for a long time.
54 posted on 09/19/2009 6:17:14 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: reg45
They concluded that hydrogen car will replace the gasoline for general use ...

Hydrogen as a fuel is a farce. Hydrogen is more akin to the acid in a battery than gasoline in a tank, that is, it is an energy storage medium, not an organic or refined fuel.

Hydrogen exists in nature almost exclusively as part of chemical compounds (hydrocarbons and water). In the case of water, you have to separate the Hydrogen atoms from the Oxygen atoms, only to then combine them into water again through combustion. Thermodynamics says this will never net an increase in energy, in other words, with perfect efficiency, you would only get out of the Hydrogen "fuel" the energy you used to make the "fuel".

Like charging a battery.

55 posted on 09/19/2009 6:20:18 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Do you have to charge the battery? How and where?


56 posted on 09/19/2009 6:21:34 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I like how the story says Limbaugh is not a fan of the cars because he says people arent buying them. To me, it sounds like Limbaugh is not a fan of the plan to have these cars be the base fleet for an auto company.


57 posted on 09/19/2009 6:24:34 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
" Merging into traffic?? That’s sooooo 1970! Most people I see around here think that a cell phone in your hand gives you the right of way and that the cars going 20 mph faster will just find a way to go around or slow down. "

Ain't that the truth.

But, I was giving a scenarios, even if the tractor trailer was doing the speed limit, it's very hard to stop or slow down 80,000 pounds of weight....
Some people think, even with cars, that you can just stop on a dime because they think they are privileged and think the world revolves around them.... there is a reason why their are traffic signs that say YIELD TO TRAFFIC.
58 posted on 09/19/2009 6:27:53 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

It both amuses and irks me that when they talk about these “clean” electric cars, they never talk about where the electricity comes from, as if it comes from a leprechaun’s pocket.


59 posted on 09/19/2009 6:31:21 AM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

>>it’s very hard to stop or slow down 80,000 pounds of weight

I really think that people don’t understand that anymore. They think, “I could stop that fast, so anyone can”. As you said, they think the world revolves around them and and I’ll add that they think that even laws of physics are just guidelines.


60 posted on 09/19/2009 6:36:08 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Question O-thority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson