Didn’t the plaintiff before Land personally write to Land that he was bugging out of the case? That leaves Orly with nothing w/r/t Land.
Brilliant or stupid. Either way, by moving Orly from plaintiff to defendant, he just might be blowing this whole thing wide open. Now, as the one in jeopardy, she gets a whole new set of rights and privileges.
Please ping your list. This looks interesting.
Mr. Brozyna is engaged in wishful thinking.
A ping for you both...hadn’t known of this disc. angle before by Judge Land.
Would be nice, but I believe the corrupt judge is simply “following orders” to get rid of the case. I wished I agreed that he did this intentionally. On Orly’s site, her reply is quite crude (I think she implied that the judge is taking an order to dismiss the case from the Commander in Chief himself, if I read it correctly). Either way, I hope her reply isn’t TOO disrespectful, although her denial was quite insulting !
As far as I know, she hasn’t even invoked Rule 11 for discovery which is by far, the BEST rebuttal !
This is a porton of Orly’s reply to denial:
“The fact that the court’s 14 page order does not address any actual statements in plaintiff’s complaint by page or paragraph number, or any page citation to her TRO, suggests to a reasonable and objective mind that the court either did not read these documents or was summarily instructed by that same illegitimate ‘chain of command’ alleged above not to address [the questions,]” the motion said.
The motion described the judge’s decision as “manifestly unjust and incorrect.”
“Dem’s fightin’ werds” ! ! ! Hope it doesn’t back fire !
Has any lawyer communicated to ORLY of this ? is she aware of this ?
What is it you think “Rule 11 discovery” means?
I believe it is rather difficult to underestimate most judges in any capacity, but especially in their capacity to default on the side of morality vs. legally pedantic process. Hence I believe it is simple to overestimate this judge's dedication to "doing the right thing".
This has been mentioned on FR.