Skip to comments.
Creationists Say Science and Bible Disprove 'Ardi' Fossil Is Evidence of Evolution (ABC News)
ABC News ^
| October 7, 2009
| RUSSELL GOLDMAN
Posted on 10/10/2009 9:32:40 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
If it looks like an ape, walks like an ape, and talks like an ape, it must be an.... ancestor of Humans!
2
posted on
10/10/2009 9:39:22 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: metmom; DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; MrB; GourmetDan; Fichori; ...
To: P-Marlowe
To: GodGunsGuts
To: caveat emptor
6
posted on
10/10/2009 10:16:40 AM PDT
by
Wacka
To: GodGunsGuts
I think the attack on Ardi will come from the supporters of “Lucy”, after all Lucy was the career building find and here, on National Television yet, NPR says Ardi is, “More important than Lucy”!!! Well, that just won't do, Lucy can't be upstaged by some retread composite hag.
7
posted on
10/10/2009 10:21:08 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: P-Marlowe; GodGunsGuts
"If it looks like an ape, walks like an ape, and talks like an ape, it must be an....
ancestor of Humans! "
--Actually, if anything, it's anatomically closer to humans than to apes (as some of the
links from GodGutsGuns explains); we know it 'walked' nothing like an ape (it wasn't a knuckle-walker); we have no idea how it 'talked'. But it
must be
just an ape . :-)
To: GodGunsGuts
another group of researchers, many of them with advanced degrees in science Don't need to go to the link: "researchers, many of them with advanced degrees in science" is code for Deluge-Creationists.
9
posted on
10/10/2009 10:49:12 AM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Obama votes "present": wins Nobel Peace Prize)
To: goodusername
After many years and so so many fossils dug up, still no clear transitional fossils of one animal type into another. If there were, evolutiion macro would have been proven totally long ago. It stays alive only as a fantasy in the thoughts of those possessed by a spirit in hatred of God. Those unwitting dupes do not know that.
10
posted on
10/10/2009 10:56:20 AM PDT
by
fabian
To: P-Marlowe
11
posted on
10/10/2009 10:57:10 AM PDT
by
svcw
(Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
To: P-Marlowe
"If it looks like an ape, walks like an ape, and talks like an ape, it must be an.... ancestor of Humans!"LMAO!!!!!!
12
posted on
10/10/2009 11:18:19 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(Where's The Birth Certificate)
To: GodGunsGuts
I love your threads. Thanks for posting them !!
13
posted on
10/10/2009 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(Where's The Birth Certificate)
To: fabian
"After many years and so so many fossils dug up, still no clear transitional fossils of one animal type into another. If there were, evolution macro would have been proven totally long ago. It stays alive only as a fantasy in the thoughts of those possessed by a spirit in hatred of God. Those unwitting dupes do not know that." Darwin also said fossils would prove it to be true. However, all evidence thus-far just proves him wrong. Some also indicate a "burst of life" from nothing.
14
posted on
10/10/2009 11:26:51 AM PDT
by
NoGrayZone
(Where's The Birth Certificate)
"What creationists believe about human origins we get from the Bible,"
That's OK, just don't add science to the mix and keep happily believing. If, however, you treat the Bible as an exhaustive, non-allegorical treatise about cosmology and biology, then go back to the geocentric theory, because there are passages in the Bible supporting this model too.
To: GodGunsGuts
Creationism is not based on scientific observation but on God's word. God created everything in six days, and that's it."This quote is quite telling, it plainly shows the anti-science bias of the id/creationists/cdesign proponentsist
GGG, you have previously stated that all the available scientific evidence supports the id/creationists/ cdesign proponentsist, however menton is stating that Creationism is not based on scientific observation So who is correct?
If Menton is wrong on this how can we trust anything else that he says since it obviously is not based on scientific observation ?
16
posted on
10/10/2009 1:22:42 PM PDT
by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
To: fabian
The scientists who have spent the past decade pouring over Ardi's fragmented skeleton believe she walked upright and that her teeth resemble modern human teeth more closely than they do those of a chimpanzee. Though they do not believe Ardi is a direct ancestor of humans or the long-sought "missing link," paleontologists say she helps show that both human beings and apes evolved from a common ancestor about 6 million years ago, that did not look much like either. Ardi, paleontologists say, was capable of grasping, something chimps need in order to climb in trees, but likely did not swing from branches the way modern chimps do.So this fossil shows chartists of modern humans and apes, then how is this not a transitional fossil?
17
posted on
10/10/2009 1:29:30 PM PDT
by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, ThereÂ’s a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
To: GodGunsGuts
18
posted on
10/10/2009 2:02:15 PM PDT
by
YHAOS
To: Oztrich Boy; GodGunsGuts; Agamemnon; metmom; CottShop; count-your-change
Don’t need to go to the link: “researchers, many of them with advanced degrees in science” is code for Deluge-Creationists.
Huh?
Does that observation hold true to FR liberals that say things like...
“I say that as a true Christian”?
Or is this more liberal “we get to make rules we don’t intend to follow” nonsense?
19
posted on
10/10/2009 3:11:37 PM PDT
by
tpanther
(Science was, is and will forever be a small subset of God's creation.)
To: Ira_Louvin
Yes, this fossil shows that there was an ape like creature that walked upright. Of course there were upright apes...very similar to bigfoot which is probably a prehistoric left over. So what. That doesn’t prove evolution at all. Where are those thousands or millions of fossils that show many different speicies evolving into other types? You know, like the evolutionists put into school text books in illustration. They simply do not exist. End of story. Case closed for people with some commonsense left after public school brainwashing.
20
posted on
10/10/2009 3:11:39 PM PDT
by
fabian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson