Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wait for benefits is 3 years if health care passes
AP on Yahoo ^ | 10/10/09 | Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar - ap

Posted on 10/10/2009 10:55:28 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – Sixty years is how long Democrats say they've been pushing for legislation that provides health care access for all Americans. They'll have to wait another three if President Barack Obama gets a bill to sign this year.

Under the Democratic bills, federal tax credits to help make health insurance affordable for millions of low- and middle-income households won't start flowing until 2013 — after the next presidential election. But Medicare cuts and a sizable chunk of the tax increases to pay for the overhaul kick in immediately.

The eat-your-vegetables-first approach is causing heartburn for some Democrats. Three years is a long time to wait for dessert, and opponents could capitalize on misgivings about the complex legislation to undo what would be a signature achievement for Obama.

...

"It's very important to get the execution right," White House budget director Peter Orszag told The Associated Press in a recent interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: benefits; healthcare; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Orszag is right,,

"It's very important to get the execution right,"

..

and that is what this nation is headed toward.. execution.

by a band of liberal anti-American politicians inleague with foreign interests using our own system of politics to bring this nation down any way they can.

1 posted on 10/10/2009 10:55:28 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Three years is a long time to wait for dessert, and opponents could capitalize on misgivings about the complex legislation to undo what would be a signature achievement for Obama.

a signature achievement?

It’ll be his first one since taking office.. and he already has a Nobel before even achieving it.


2 posted on 10/10/2009 10:57:12 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The commie ‘RATs love to whine about the mess they “inherited” from President Bush. Can you imagine the mess the next president is going to “inherit” from the commie ‘RATS? Yikes!


3 posted on 10/10/2009 10:59:13 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (DUDE! Where's MY Nobel Peace Prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It's by design. The election of 2012 must be held with the Grand Achievement of healthcare reform right in front of people. Oh! Look what wonders the Democrats have provided for us! And it shall all be ours in just a few more months -- unless that opposition party gets in and messes everything up!

And afterwards, there will be 4 years in which private insurers go bankrupt, private firms stop offering coverage (hey, get it from the government!) and everyone gets sucked into some level of dependency.

And in 2016, it will seem nearly unthinkable that government healthcare ever be taken away.

Timing is everything, and the initial 3 year delay is very important for this thing to work as planned.

4 posted on 10/10/2009 11:00:04 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Play the Race Card -- lose the game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Obama administration officials and Democratic lawmakers say the reason for the three-year wait is the time it's going to take to set up insurance marketplaces, write consumer protection rules and reconfigure the bureaucracy to carry out the legislation.

"It's very important to get the execution right," White House budget director Peter Orszag told The Associated Press in a recent interview.

There's another reason, less talked about: to make the costs of the plan seem more manageable under congressional budgeting rules.

Lawmakers use a 10-year accounting window to assess new programs. Starting the Medicare cuts and some of the taxes in the early years — and pushing the bulk of new spending into the latter years — helps keep the cost of the health care overhaul within Obama's $900 billion limit.

"It means that the full cost of the program is underestimated in the 10-year window that you are looking at," said Gail Wilensky. "It's not like we've never seen this before, but people need to understand what's going on."

5 posted on 10/10/2009 11:01:35 AM PDT by Joiseydude (I'd rather die on my feet, than live on my knees. Live free or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

....by a band of liberal anti-American politicians inleague with foreign interests using our own system of politics to bring this nation down any way they can.
:::::::
Precisely. And half of the electorate either does not care, is too stupid to realize where these America-haters are taking us, or just want whatever lifestyle the government is either GIVING them or has promised them in their plethora of lies. Even after all the warning and yelling BEFORE the election about what these criminals and tyrants were all about and what they would do to America if they were given the power to do so.

In all my years, I have never been so frustrated or fed up with the American public and a corrupt and twisted Congress.


6 posted on 10/10/2009 11:01:43 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This sh*t needs to cease.
7 posted on 10/10/2009 11:02:08 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (Truth--The liberal's Kryptonite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Nothing but Smoke and mirrors.

As goes California, so goes the nation.


8 posted on 10/10/2009 11:03:49 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Actually, timing is everything but with a different scenario.

The elections in 2010 become a major issue....with Republicans retaking the house because of this issue, but the Democrats will still control the Senate. 2011 will be wasted as the White House can’t accomplish anything and the House can’t undo this mess. 2011 becomes the year that the President mostly travels outside of the US, for obvious reasons.

So 2012 comes and the entire election is based on one-subject...the universal health care package. It’ll be debated over and over and over. The President is counting on this as his one and only accomplishment for the whole four years....so his vote is dependent on people buying this whole thing...if not...then the new guy and new senate in 2013...undo the whole thing.

It’s a brilliant strategy. There isn’t another thing that this administration will accomplish over the remaining three years. It’s sitting there and preparing for the 2012 election...based on this one piece of legislation. The only thing that could throw a wrench into this...is the Supreme Court.


9 posted on 10/10/2009 11:07:10 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The day by day continual transformation of our ‘Democracy’ based on individual liberties to ‘corporatist’,or a socialist authoritarian society like Europe.
Just before elections, the government ‘allows’ increased freedom then after the election it’s back to business as usual.
IMHO, The threat by the dems in 2012 will be about the upcoming entitlement program that those mean old Republicans will deny you even after you’ve paid into it for the past 3 years. Evil genius if you ask me.


10 posted on 10/10/2009 11:09:24 AM PDT by griswold3 (You think health care is expensive now? Just wait till it's FREE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...federal tax credits...won't start flowing until 2013

So, by the rules of logic that must mean that we have until 2013 to enjoy our medical care as it is. Right?

11 posted on 10/10/2009 11:10:11 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It won’t matter. Hospitals are going to get slammed the minute this passes.


12 posted on 10/10/2009 11:10:20 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Oathkeepers.org


13 posted on 10/10/2009 11:10:52 AM PDT by manonCANAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

So goes the ‘empire’...

“Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome who have so enthusiastically acclaimed and adored him and rejoiced in their loss of freedom and danced in his path and gave him triumphal processions. … Blame the people who hail him when he speaks in the Forum of the ‘new, wonderful good society’ which shall now be Rome’s, interpreted to mean ‘more money, more ease, more security, more living fatly at the expense of the industrious.’” –Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.)


14 posted on 10/10/2009 11:11:41 AM PDT by griswold3 (You think health care is expensive now? Just wait till it's FREE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If this legislation does pass in one form or another and there is the 3 year wait, as appears the case, then the voting public will have 2+ years of paying taxes for nothing. 2+ years puts us into the election year.

Once again, I don’t think the pols have figured this out. If the platform of the R’s in ‘12 is one of overturning the health-care legislation before it’s enactment then the election might be very, very interesting.


15 posted on 10/10/2009 11:12:59 AM PDT by happydogx2 (Affordable housing worked so well let's try healthcare next...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

“Do not blame Caesar, blame the people of Rome who have so enthusiastically acclaimed and adored him.....

::::::::

Yes. “Pass the Kool-Aid please....I need another dose of stupidity..” said the mindless liberal...


16 posted on 10/10/2009 11:14:43 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Brilliant assessment. Wow, you have nailed it...


17 posted on 10/10/2009 11:18:55 AM PDT by hot4plasma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
In all my years, I have never been so frustrated or fed up with the American public and a corrupt and twisted Congress.

Exactly the way I feel. I have never been so disgusted with a huge segment of Americans.

18 posted on 10/10/2009 11:28:05 AM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

All of the utopian dreams are hope and promises. I cannot think of *one* campaign promise this guy has fulfilled. Not one. Not even talking about the or an idealized end result, just talking about having made significant progress towards the promised end. On anything. And I can think of plenty of promises made that are being aggressively reversed: Lower limits on tax increases, “torture”, Afghanistan, and rendition of detainees. Of course, having nothing measurable (except unemployment and, I will admit, the stock market, neither of which I believe the pres has any control over. Well, unless there’s guaranteed amnesty for any and everything Goldman Sachs can contrive to pump the market) means you can never be held accountable. It’s the condition of idealized government that just keeps on giving.

There were 500 or so inmates in Gitmo, the Gitmo he promised he would close. I welcome correction on that number, it’s from memory. We’ve relocated what, 8 of them? 12?

Now he’s talking about a compromise gov’t with the Taliban. Uh huh, right. This is peace.

We’re now in and looking to go deeper into a synthetic socialistic universe. I’m afraid that everything we know and cherish will be proven wrong and untenable.


19 posted on 10/10/2009 11:35:23 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (It's better to give a Ford to the Kidney Foundation than a kidney to the Ford Foundation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This will be the set-up for Barry to win in 2012. The plan has been designed not to solve today’s problems today, but to re-elect Barry for his second term. The scare tactic will be - you NEED to re-elect him otherwise those eeeevil Republicans will take all your healthcare away and kill you.


20 posted on 10/10/2009 12:14:55 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson