Obama to surrender US sovereignty at UN global warming conference

examiner.com ^ | 10/19/2009 | James Simpson

[massmike]

bookmark

[greyfoxx39]

Rush just played some Monckton clips...word is getting out!

[FutureRocketMan]

Are you sure of that?

[greyfoxx39]

Businessman and freelance writer James Simpson is a former Office of Management and Budget (White House budget office) economist and budget analyst. Best known for his exposé on the Cloward Piven Strategy of manufactured crisis, his writings have been published in American Thinker, The New Media Journal, Washington Times, FrontPage Magazine, Whistleblower, DefenseWatch, Soldier of Fortune and others. His blog is Truth and Consequences. Email James.

[Rockitz]

Are you so sure? They have 60. They only need 6 more NWO morons like Lindsay Graham, Juan McInsane, etc.

[Quix]

YEA RUSH!

[NormsRevenge]

What lies ahead will make the Bastille look like a Sunday social.

[Blogger]

for later

[Ronbo1948]

Events are spinning out of control...I see civil war in this country breaking out in the spring...

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Thank GAWD this story got some legs!!!!! Beck and Rush have been all over this today as well!

[444Flyer]

These people are playing for keeps.

Under Obama, Americans are dead men walking.

[unkus]

This treaty will NEVER be ratified by the US Senate.

_____________________________

I don’t trust them. The New World Order.

[Carry_Okie]

It doesn't take long to Google a UN document stating that treaties are considered binding upon signature, NOT RATIFICATION. Frankly, there are so many sources of this that it would take too long to pick out the most definitive.

From but one such UN document (PDF): An Overview of International Law, page 6:

Once a treaty is signed, customary law, as well as the 1969 Vienna Convention, state that a State must not act contrary to the object and purpose of the particular treaty, even if it has not entered into force yet.

That's right, upon "signature," per the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. As to who would enforce it, that would be a United States Government, pursuant to an unconstitutional usurpation of power (similar to any one of hundreds).

If you are thinking of looking for help from the SCOTUS, I wouldn't go there. They've been part of this little scam from the day the Constitution was signed.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Just like the atrocity called obamacare with a nat ID card in it won’t pass...

The democrats are a sinking ship and they do not care. They have but one goal and this thread’s title is it. Who will stop them?

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Will 0bama bypass the votes of 2/3rd’s of the congress to do this? He has frighteningly gotten away with everything else.

[Major Matt Mason]

He will have a hard time screwing this one up.

Not only this, but it will also send a tingle up and down this America hater's leg as he is doing the deed.

[Tzimisce]

Starting on Pearl Harbor Day.

[Truth29]

Well, no treaty is inviolate and irreversable if the government abrogating the treaty is strong enough and resolute enough. I am not optimistic that the US would ever back out of this treaty after signature, but a US that explained that it was bigger, stronger and meaner than the opposition could do it (a fantasy, I know).

[RightOnTheLeftCoast]

"The US Senate rejected the UN’s Biodiversity Treaty in 1994. Clinton told the senate to go “F” itself and signed a blizzard of EOs and dictates... Clinton should have been impeached for this, not Monica’s dress."

I certainly agree (add Chinagate too), and the topic is very serious, but I can't resist asking: do you really want to talk about how his dictates at the same time you mention Monica?

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

Im sure he takes joy in that just like he screwed over Poland and the Ukraine on Russia’s anniversary on accident oooops yeah right my ass.