Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS SUIT AGAINST OBAMA & ROBERTS TO BE CONFERENCED ON 11/06/09
My own self as I'm the SCOTUS Petitioner herself ^ | 10/28/09 | Susan Herbert

Posted on 10/28/2009 10:48:59 AM PDT by susanconstant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: susanconstant

This is the most powerful writing since Julius Caesar.


21 posted on 10/28/2009 11:04:29 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Not even going to try reading that!

Did scroll through the thread hoping some kind soul would enlighten me as to what it says but alas no luck there either.


22 posted on 10/28/2009 11:05:18 AM PDT by Bigun ("It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant
How about a Cliff Notes version for those of us who have some semblance of a life?
23 posted on 10/28/2009 11:07:13 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Where are are we going and how did I get in this hand basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Ping.

New Supreme Court case against Obama. Verified that it exists. See post 16.


24 posted on 10/28/2009 11:08:28 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
can you sum this up in clear plain english in less than 100 words, with paragraphs and stuff? what is this about and what does it mean?.

Sure..nothing.

25 posted on 10/28/2009 11:09:14 AM PDT by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Right along with you. What the heck is this?


26 posted on 10/28/2009 11:11:45 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
'Can you sum this up...' - Summary is here: - In what kind of case is it impossible for the illegally sitting US government to respond and if it does fail to respond thus defaults may a Chief Justice then circumvent the US completely via acting to address the default w/o ever getting any response as he did on 11/20/08? - Any questions?
27 posted on 10/28/2009 11:13:32 AM PDT by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; rocco55; thouworm; rxsid; GOPJ; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

. . . . #16.

.

28 posted on 10/28/2009 11:15:53 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
A paragraph this long is a Class A Felony.

LOL!!!! You owe me a new monitor! :)

29 posted on 10/28/2009 11:17:46 AM PDT by Kitsunebi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant; Salamander; Slings and Arrows; Markos33

Susan, take a deep breath. Close your eyes. Now open them slowly.

Now tell us very, very slowly - What color is the sky?

Oh?

...and how many of those suns do you see up there?

Really? That many?!?

The next thing you feel will be the KittyZot - it only hurts for a moment.....

(Don’t get me wrong - We’d all probably rather live in your world - but we don’t.)


30 posted on 10/28/2009 11:17:51 AM PDT by shibumi (" ..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Wow, someone knows how to cut and paste!


31 posted on 10/28/2009 11:18:06 AM PDT by HapaxLegamenon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Ping. New Supreme Court case against Obama. Verified that it exists. See post 16.

This fact appears to be the only thing I can understand about this thread so far !! I only can wish that as many of these that have been brought, just one of them would connect with a judge/court that would be sypathetic to FACTS and put out of their minds the "What if it is me who starts the race riots?"
32 posted on 10/28/2009 11:18:24 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant

Huh?


33 posted on 10/28/2009 11:18:30 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobsatwork
Oh right

It's all quite simple really. What idiots we were not to understand what 'may a Chief Justice then circumvent the US completely via acting to address the default' means.

Susan: you are obviously a patriot. Unfortunately your words make no sense. Take a deep breath and try again.

34 posted on 10/28/2009 11:18:36 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Totally gnarly, dude!


35 posted on 10/28/2009 11:19:06 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HapaxLegamenon
Wow, someone knows how to cut and paste!

My Windows clipboard just went on strike.

36 posted on 10/28/2009 11:19:47 AM PDT by xjcsa (And these three remain: change, hope and government. But the greatest of these is government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant
I stopped reading at: "I then appealed to Roberts directly on 11/20/09 and forced direct action thus I won on paper." I will await a summary to resume.
37 posted on 10/28/2009 11:21:17 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant

Any way you could’ve summarized this?


38 posted on 10/28/2009 11:22:13 AM PDT by uncitizen (I'm mad as hell and i'm not gonna take it anymore!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: susanconstant
Yow! THAT's going to go a long way at SC.

YOU CAN SUE SITTING OFFICERS FOR LIABILITY THUS DISSOLVE THEM ...


39 posted on 10/28/2009 11:24:52 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Nepolean fries the idea powder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
No. 09-6777
Title:
Susan Herbert, Petitioner
v.
United States, et al.
Docketed: October 1, 2009
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  Case Nos.: (09-10661)
  Decision Date: August 3, 2009

~~~Date~~~  ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 22 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2009)
Oct 13 2009 Waiver of right of respondents United States, et al. to respond filed.
Oct 22 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 6, 2009.



~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Susan Herbert 1100 Seagate Avenue 101 (904) 705-6171
Neptune Beach, FL  32266
Party name: Susan Herbert
Attorneys for Respondents:
Elena Kagan Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC  20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov
Party name: United States, et al.

40 posted on 10/28/2009 11:25:15 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson