Posted on 11/08/2009 9:26:47 AM PST by An Old Man
The Army may have possessed compelling evidence this person posed a security risk, but downplayed it.
If he advocated doing violence to infidels — as he appears to have, to colleagues and patient(s) — the shooter should have been confined, and given no access to massed troops.
Maybe what we need is more “backlash” and fewer group hugs.
You are correct. And I love your screen name. How many radicals or dormant cells who have been lying in wait are now ready to crawl out from under their rock to do us harm? Wasn't some other jihadist recently picked up for plotting to shoot inncoent shoppers at a mall? What happened at Fort Hood was straight up Islamic terrorism. And no official or politician is going to convince me otherwise. I was in the city on 9/11 and my heart goes out to the people at Ft. Hood. Unfortunately, all of this has brought my inner anger out. This administration is failing to protect the citizens. It's just a matter of time until the next attack. And what happens then? Bring on the analysts...... that's the playbook.
As always, an excellent reply. Thanks for responding.
Nuts are nuts, it does not make any difference where they were born, put them in the chair and throw the switch. Roasted nut, end of that nuts problem.
"Closed", hell.
Level the place, and turn the property into a pig farm.
“Army chief fears backlash for Muslim U.S. soldiers”
Army chief should fear Muslim U.S. soldiers
This is what the Army’s top general sits around and publicly frets about?
Good lord...makes me sick to my stomach how far a great nation could fall so fast over catering to every minority whim that strikes a damned fancy.
There are no unimportant roles in our military. The lives of all depend upon the actions of others.
Following ant tracking consume needed resources. Is there another solution?
Living by exceptions in a war is foolishness
Nothing that doing away with that pesky Constitution wouldn't solve.
I absolutely agree! We do not wait until a white supremacist murders or a Christian Identity member commits a violent act. Those groups are denounced and shunned 24/7. Thus the general Christian population can not fairly be accused and stereotyped and is not accused -- except by the left wing nuts over at dailycuss, huff'n puff post, moron.org, dummyunderground, and such nut sites.
Why don't American Muslims stand up to Islamism? I wonder. It is up to American Muslims.
And they are being built as we speak, all over our counrtry, continuously, for the last twenty years...
As soon as I can find it, I will post the map of the number of mosques and "muslim community centers" in the US. These are regularly identified as military training camps.
If the Vatican were funding the construction of Christian churches at that rate, there would be apoplexy among the MSM and there would be riots.
Even though not a single instance of a Christian exists where the killer distributed bibles before massacring dozens of "non-believers."
Our country must be on a collective high dosage of soporifics...
That’s right. Someone murders because of what he was taught by a hate group. Use government resources to protect other members of the hate group.
mass deportations
You’re right about the no unimportant jobs.
I guess I would not be sending them to Afghanistan.
I would probably try to find locations far from the middle east, and then put them in positions where they don’t have much access to critical information.
Ans: Yes.
My fellow Americans can get pretty nasty and Japanese Americans largely lived in their own communities, yes I believe it.
Political correctness run amok, even in our military.
The f**ker was a fanatical MUSLIM TERRORIST, plain and simple, and those of his ilk MUST be weeded OUT of our military.
No, we can't depend on the majority of Generals (no George Washington's in our current ranks I'm afraid) and Colonels to do what is right and necessary.
It will have to be the Captains and below that take care of business (something akin to a Honduran solution?) when and if the time comes.
Contrast Barry's non-response to the response of GW Bush to 9/11. Disgusting!!! A shoutout and laughing before announcing it in front of that Indian conference. Followed by, "let's not jump to conclusions." It makes me want to puke. The kenyan had no problem "jumping to conclusions" after the incident with the Cambridge policeman, but when it's one of his co-religionists we have to be "tolerent".
2012 can't come soon enough!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.