Posted on 11/23/2009 9:39:37 PM PST by JohnRLott
Where is the resident FR global warming apologist cogitator?
I think he needs to get a spanking.
BTTT! No, they're not. :)
There is no evidence of hackers. The FOIA file was likely assembled by CRU internally and inadvertently left on an open ftp site when it couldn't be emailed as an attachment. CRU was already revealed as careless in their alleged AGW research and data archiving. Less plausible, an FOIA-protected whistle blower may have released the file.
You’re supposed to ping a Freeper when talking about what they’ve posted; he pretty much left except for a cameo last month on the carbon budget; said something about us being incorrigible or something like that.
he is on par with L Ron Hubbard
http://www.eastangliaemails.com/emails.php?eid=119
also, read these eid #s:
66, 67, 72, 73, 74, 79, 80, 81
#81 talks of a $$$transfer to or from Briffa
#83, 84, 85, 87(more$$), 88, 89, 94, 96, 97, 98, 99, 103, 104, 112, 113
These are from 1998 and early 1999
^
keywords which will be fruitful(promise!!)
CO2 values, CO2 concentrations, CO2 calculations, CO2 reconstructions, pattern reconstructions, CO2 numbers, climate scenarios, SRES scenarios, no correlation, scientific cooperation, climate change, abrupt climate change, proxy data, dataset, IPCC dataset, IPCC database, millenia-scale reconstruction, global climate proxies, DDC mirror web sites, climate of last millenia , INTAS, climate modelers, IPCC TAR, dendro, tree ring(s), paleo, palaeo-community, emissions scenarios, IS92, IS92a, IS95
Good luck and happy hunting!
We live in a weird Topsy-turvey world... Imagine trying to explain this to somebody from another planet! We are odd prideful, vapid, rather slow witted creatures apparently.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I think someone once said that the human brain represents the only known example of an organism evolving a working organ which it does not know how to use. The more I reflect on that the more sense it makes 80)
As soon as I became aware of this story last Thursday I sent a number of links to a friend in Germany fighting the AGW agenda in Europe. Subsequently the e-mails were authenticated, and I alerted him of that.
He was ecstatic! However, I told him the media would likely suppress this info in this country; I urged him to distribute the info as best he could to those who could make proper use of it.
In this country the main media has become a more dangerous enemy than bin Laden!
n u t t y f u d g e
right, and it does make one wonder. I made a pretty early catch on global warming, but it really makes me wonder how many other really stupid things rattle around in my head under the guise of “truth”.
“..That way, their “loathsome spotty behinds” are covered no matter WHAT happens to the planet!”
My EYES! LOL.
Oh that REALLY helps the environment. I’ll have to tell my Inuit relatives to put some extra spikes on their billy clubs and head out for that glacier. (The chief is still mighty pissed at the gub’mint for sending him body bags instead of Tamaflu!)
.
This is too big to stop. If the MSM don't pick it up, they will be like little islands of denial in the midst of rising flood waters, and end up looking ridiculous like they did by censoring the ACORN bust.
The fact is, falling for unsubstantiated and unlikely claims, whether about aliens, vaccinations, or crop circles, sets one up to be that much more easily had by scoundrels like Algore.
The watchword of the skeptic remains: extrardinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We have learned here, with AGW, that just because someone with impressive-sounding credentials spews exotic BS, does not mean it has a leg to stand on.
The last thing climate-oriented I posted was to point out that a lot of skeptics missed the fact that 2005 was a whisker less warm (or a whisker more warm, depending on which dataset is consulted) than 1998. Which is a kind of weird thing to happen during a decade long cooling trend. Especially when there wasn't an El Nino involved in 2005, as opposed to 1998. Next year might be interesting, if anyone believes the temperature record anymore. It's not really my problem if people "believe" or not; the temperature is what it is and will be what it will be.
"“What we now have is an out-and-out propaganda piece, in which there is not even a gesture toward balance or explanation of why many of the extended inferences drawn in the film are not widely accepted by the scientific community. There are so many examples, it's hard to know where to begin, so I will cite only one: a speaker asserts, as is true, that carbon dioxide is only a small fraction of the atmospheric mass. The viewer is left to infer that means it couldn't really matter. But even a beginning meteorology student could tell you that the relative masses of gases are irrelevant to their effects on radiative balance. A director not intending to produce pure propaganda would have tried to eliminate that piece of disinformation.” -- Carl Wunsch (http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/papersonline/responseto_channel4.htm)"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.