Birth control leader Margaret Sanger: Darwinist, racist and eugenicist

Journal of Creation ^ | Jerry Bergman, Ph.D.

[GodGunsGuts]

Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood, the leading organization advocating abortion in the United States today. Darwinism had a profound influence on her thinking, including her conversion to, and active support of, eugenics. She was specifically concerned with reducing the population of the ‘less fit’, including ‘inferior races’ such as ‘Negroes’. One major result of her lifelong work was to support the sexual revolution that has radically changed our society...

[GodGunsGuts]

For the record, this post is being posted in News/Activism by the express permission of Jim Robinson, founder and owner of Free Republic:

“Debate on church doctrine and or threads on specific religious matters may be best posted in the religion forum, but the defense of religious freedom, especially against those who wish to deprive us of same belongs front and center on FR....They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!”

—Jim Robinson

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2203455/posts?page=78#78

[Moonman62]

Darwinism had a profound influence on her thinking, including her conversion to, and active support of, eugenics.

Doubtful. Artificial selection was around long before Darwin.

[GodGunsGuts]

Christian Right Ping!

[freekitty]

Hey all you Hillary lovers; this woman is her idol.

[mtg]

For me, her abortion rights agenda was the worst of the three.

[dumpthelibs]

There is a special room in hell for Singer and additional ante rooms for abortion supporters. Interesting article in American Thinker called “Adaptive Liberal Hypocrisy” about why liberals arrive at their warped thinking and how they twist their minds into believing that abortion is “reproductive rights” versus murder.

[joelt]

I thought I had read that she wanted to limit the growth of deficient races via birth control, but was against abortion. It wasn’t legal anywhere back then. What ever the truth of that, she is still heinous.

[count-your-change]

Sanger said each must be a god unto themselves and her practice of ego worship shows she meant it.

Humans are not designed to live apart from their Creator.

[Liberty1970]

Care to actually read the article? It’s a good read and very informative.

[mc6809e]

Her philosophy is better than we have now, which is to screw responsible mothers and fathers by forcing them through taxation to subsidize irresponsible breeders who go one to make even more irresponsible breeders.

[count-your-change]

O.K., Who gave out the crayons to the children? Keywords have “spammer” added so I know it has to be some childish....ummm...individual?....that thinks that's really cute. Wonder who that might be?

[metmom]

Considering the list posted by the mods last time, one can guess.

[GodGunsGuts]

I forgot about that. Do you remember what post that was???

[Admin Moderator]

Of the keywords posted, all but four were posted by GodGunsGuts.
Thanks,
AM

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[wagglebee]

Her philosophy is better than we have now, which is to screw responsible mothers and fathers by forcing them through taxation to subsidize irresponsible breeders who go one [sic] to make even more irresponsible breeders.

So, you SUPPORT Sanger's racism and eugenics?

What exactly do you think should be done with those you call "irresponsible breeders who go one [sic] to make even more irresponsible breeders"?

Do you support the forced sterilization of those you consider "irresponsible breeders"? You know the plan that Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. justified with the infamous phrase, "three generations of imbeciles are enough"?

[count-your-change]

Thanks. I think “spammer” was one of the four, yes?

[TheBigIf]

For the record, this post is being posted in News/Activism by the express permission of Jim Robinson, founder and owner of Free Republic:

“Debate on church doctrine and or threads on specific religious matters may be best posted in the religion forum, but the defense of religious freedom, especially against those who wish to deprive us of same belongs front and center on FR....They banned God and prayer and creationism from public schools and public places, but I’ll be damned if they’re gonna ban Him or it from FR!”

—Jim Robinson

For the record I am not religious at all but I strongly consider myself a conservative.

I applaud anyone who stands up for religious freedom becuase in essence they are standing up for freedom itself.

There is no reason why a person should not be able to express their views in public simply beacuse they are based upon their religious belief. I call for EVERYONE regardless of how they base their beliefs to be able to have EQUAL representation under the law. MAJORITY RULES!

The left-wing constantly tries to claim that the science is settled from issues on when Life begins, to how mankind effects the weather, to whether or not homosexuality is a corruption or not. The left-wing does not want the People to have any right to representation on any of these issues. The science is settled they claim.

The left-wing wants to ban religion because they think that they can then force others to march lockstep with them.

I applaud Free Republic for opposing such an agenda and for standing up for liberty.

[GodGunsGuts]

Amen to that!