Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UIPA REQUEST CONFIRMS QUIP, EXPLAINS MULTIPLE ORIGINAL VITAL RECORDS OF BARACK OBAMA
thepostemail ^ | 1/12/2010 | John Charlton

Posted on 01/12/2010 7:50:15 PM PST by rxsid

Edited on 01/13/2010 2:21:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]

As can be seen from Obama’s own mouth, at about 5:55 into the above video, he clearly says that his name is Steve.

Based on this admission, the citizen-researcher requested from Janice Okubo, Communications Director for the Hawaii Department of Health, the index data for all the Steve Dunhams in their registry for an individual born August 4, 1961. The request was made on Oct. 29, 2009. The answer came on November 10.


(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; dunham; fraud; hawaii; ineligible; kenya; obama; soetoro; stephen; steve; stevedunham; steven; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last
To: patlin
What about that the UIPA request, and the name "Steve Dunham" that was allegedly confirmed by HI as having been born on 8/4/1961?

This is a VERY early developing story so far as I know, but I haven't heard anyone discredit that yet.

41 posted on 01/12/2010 8:57:15 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Also a joke...says his name is Barack Steve Obama.


42 posted on 01/12/2010 8:57:50 PM PST by oldteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

How so? I’m simply asking because I don’t know one way or another. I haven’t proven, yet, that the UIPA request never took place, or that the state of HI never confirmed a Steve Dunham as being born on 8/4/1961 (in the index).


43 posted on 01/12/2010 8:59:03 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Perhaps just as important, if not more so, is if the alleged UIPA REQUEST really did come back "positive" for a "Steve Dunham" born on 8/4/1961. If true, what are the odd's of that being someone else?

Astronomical. Barry, Steve, Barrack. The file on this fraud must be 3 reams thick.
44 posted on 01/12/2010 9:04:31 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Well, we didn't get dressed up for nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

It sounds like the author of this article is saying that Hawaii affirmed that they have a record of a “Steven Dunham” born on the same day as Obama. If this is true what are the odds?

So Obama was pretty brazen at the comedy dinner if this is true.


45 posted on 01/12/2010 9:06:06 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Electric Graffiti

Indeed! And that, is the really story here that should be followed up on. Not from where someone got the idea to initiate a UIPA request on the name Steve Dunham. I’m sure folks have submitted such requests for hundreds of names/variations for Barry.


46 posted on 01/12/2010 9:07:39 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Info ping to an interesting development. :-)


47 posted on 01/12/2010 9:07:49 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

If the tape doesn’t say that, looks like another dead end on the COLB front.


48 posted on 01/12/2010 9:08:20 PM PST by FrankR (There will be no jobs until it is profitable for employers to hire people....PERIOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Agreed. That’s the part of the article folks should be focusing on, and not the mistakenly placed youtube vid that the editor has since removed.


49 posted on 01/12/2010 9:08:59 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I remember watching it that night and him saying his name was Steve. It stuck with me as someone posted a list of alternate names/soc. security numbers and Steve or Steven Obama was listed as one of them. I thought it curious and wondered if in jest, he was really telling the truth.


50 posted on 01/12/2010 9:10:22 PM PST by Marmolade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Yes, that video Obama say he is Steve.

Save it to your hard drive....


51 posted on 01/12/2010 9:10:49 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

Not at all. At least until this follow part (what the article is about) is discredited. See the numerous updates and follow-up questions regarding the actual, alleged UIPA request that returned a “positive” hit for a “Steve Dunham” born on 8/4/1961.


52 posted on 01/12/2010 9:12:00 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

Found the video where he says his middle name is “Steve”...it is in Part 2 of the dinner video at about 1:36

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SkFjTCscM4&feature=video_response


53 posted on 01/12/2010 9:12:58 PM PST by Ritima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

He is comfortable with brazen acts. Remember using his middle finger to scratch his face when talking about Hillary?

The guy is a jerk, and he’s full of himself. I find it entirely possible that the “Steve” joke was an intentional poke in the eye at the gullible public that would soon vote for him.


54 posted on 01/12/2010 9:13:13 PM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Marmolade

Me, too .... it stuck with me and
I knew there was a ring of truth
to this.


55 posted on 01/12/2010 9:14:52 PM PST by STARWISE (.They (LIBS-STILL) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war- Richard Miniter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah

“The guy is a jerk, and he’s full of himself. I find it entirely possible that the “Steve” joke was an intentional poke in the eye at the gullible public that would soon vote for him.”

I couldn’t agree with you more. It sounds exactly like something he would do.


56 posted on 01/12/2010 9:15:10 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

How do you save a video to your computer ? Help ...


57 posted on 01/12/2010 9:16:42 PM PST by STARWISE (.They (LIBS-STILL) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war- Richard Miniter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; rxsid

Any explanations for simple minds apprecitated.

Since the article states:

“In her official response received by email last night, Okubo denied that there is any index data for a vital record of a birth on August 4, 1961 for a “Steve Dunham.”

How is this a good thing? She says there is no vital record, or no index data? So there is no record? Please elucidate!

Regarding 0bama saying his middle name is “Steve”, I think it’s interesting, as liars often reveal just a little truth to feel superior to the idiots who don’t know the truth, or by accident, slip of the tongue/mind, etc.


58 posted on 01/12/2010 9:18:19 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I use Mozilla Firefox web browser that has the Add-on called “Download Helper”

Add On search site:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox

And

The extension site for Download Helper:

http://www.downloadhelper.net/


59 posted on 01/12/2010 9:26:04 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

“What about that the UIPA request, and the name “Steve Dunham” that was allegedly confirmed by HI as having been born on 8/4/1961?”


This is what the UIPA response was as described in the article you posted:

“In her official response received by email last night, Okubo denied that there is any index data for a vital record of a birth on August 4, 1961 for a “Steve Dunham.” It took her 90 days to figure out how to respond. And that in itself lets you, the reader, know what she meant to say: his name is “Steve Dunham”!”


This person says he did not get confirmation on a “Steve Dunham” vital record with the birth date of 8/4/61. Then the author goes on to say this official denial proves she was right - his name is “Steve Dunham.” I don’t understand why this is being discussed.


60 posted on 01/12/2010 9:26:51 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson