26-week abortion
Posted on 01/29/2010 9:49:10 AM PST by FutureRocketMan
WICHITA, Kan. — A man who said he killed prominent Kansas abortion provider Dr. George Tiller in order to save the lives of unborn children was convicted Friday of murder.
The jury deliberated for just 37 minutes before finding Scott Roeder, 51, of Kansas City, Mo., guilty of premeditated, first-degree murder in the May 31 shooting death.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Evil is tearing apart babies in abbatoirs. Evil is sending millions of humans to the gulags. Evil is rounding up millions in death camps.
Evil is NOT killing a Nazi or Commie or Turk or murderer of human children.
So using your logic, the killing of an abortionist is one of the best things that one can do. How many have you killed? How many children have you saved?
So, which is it? Do you claim you’re NOT a statist or do you just not like being yanked out of the statist closet? You obviously view it as derogatory. Own it.
Further, I specifically stated you had no rebuttal, which is why you resorted to ad hominem argument in calling me a moron, so your statement “As for a “rebuttal”, LMAO. I’m not debating with you, fool.” suggests I viewed your reply as rebuttal when, in fact, I specifically said it wasn’t a rebuttal and that you are seeking cover in ad hominem which is where people with no valid rebuttal go. Maybe your more fundamental problem is lack of reading comprehension.
You are NOT anti-abortion. You may think you are, but you are not.
no one asked you..lol
that will probably get yanked but is proof enough why I could care less about Tiller getting shot
Thanks for your note.
People with that view are not only statists, they’re also not pro-life. They simply lie, either to themselves deliberately or to others unwittingly. When the rubber meets the road, they side with the baby-killers. That says it all. Desiring the state to end the life of the one person who put a stop to the buthering of unborn innocents when it was the state that failed those unborn innocents in the first place is sick, sick, sick. It’s not even logical.
I don’t know what was in Roeder’s mind. He clearly knew what would happen to him, so maybe it was his destiny. Maybe it was God’s will. Maybe Roeder’s crazy. I don’t know. What I do know is that somebody finally put that rabid murderer down by placing his own life on the line. If the state or the citizens of KS had done its job, there would have been no scenario in which someone would believe that step was necessary. There’s plenty of blood to go around.
The only thing that would stop me is the fear of life in prison or the DP. If I was dying of a terrible disease and didn’t have long to live anyway, it’d be a different story.
You’re mentally ill. I hope that you find some help, but I doubt that you will.
Good point.
Sometimes someone has to do something. Clearly this country no longer has the moral infrastructure to outlaw barbaric acts against children, even though we have the infrastructure to stand up a military established for our physical protection.
It was legal treason to defy King George. But some things have to be done, legal or not, damn the conserquences.
But I have to disagree with your point, “It appears that this righteous cause of protection of children has not yet reached the level of the state “taking care of business” for us.” The state is not in either an incompetent nor passive position. In fact, it was the overt actions of the state itself and the citizens of KS that set the stage for this to happen.
Some of us believe there is a moral right to put a stop to the mass murder of innocents. We are simply too cowardly to do it. We don’t want to be dragged out of our nice, warm homes away from our families and friends, put on trial, and then executed or imprisoned for decades.
Our revolutionary ancestors risked their lives, their families’ lives, their wealth, their future, everything, for a moral right to freedom from tyranny and the opportunity for LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They fought, bled and died for it. Now we whine about not breaking man’s laws created by a statist cabal of tyrannical, elitist politicians who empty our pockets and impose themselves through their laws into the most intimate aspects of our lives. That is not what we signed up for.
How long will people continue to respect the laws of such tyrants and the sycophantic, bloodsucking parasites they breed for their bureaucracies?
Moral right transcends man’s law. If it didn’t, we wouldn’t be here.
Should he have challenged Tiller to a duel?
When did Tiller ever engage in a fair fight with a fetus?
Great point. Roe IS anarchy.
You’re morally ill. The only hope for you is Purgatory. I hope you get lucky and that works out for you. Meanwhile, enjoy all the benefits the State has to offer you while you’re alive. They owe you. Carrying their water can’t always be a cakewalk.
Why stop at doctors that perform third trimester abortions?
Why not also go after doctors that perform first trimester abortions?
Why not also go after doctors that implant IUD's into women's uteruses?
Why not also go after pharmacists that dispense abortion pills?
Why not go after women who have IUD's and women who have had abortions or women that may have an abortion in the future?
So, just where do you draw the line?
Now remember, life begins at conception, so the pharmacist that dispenses the morning after pill is in the very same business as Dr. Tiller.
God Bless his soul. He succeeded not only in bringing justice to a vicious murderer, Roeder succeeded in closing the abortion mill down! He is a hero and people who think that you have to be a nutcase to believe so should do a very serious morality check.
“My opinion: A killer killed a killer. If we were to have people kill in disregard for the law - as bad as the law is - we’d have anarchy that would dwarf even the horror of abortion.”
You are joking right? Fifty million deaths at the hands of abortionists and you think killing a few of their murdering bunch is more dangerous than that? Get a reality check...
‘The only disgusting breach of justice I see here is Kansas’s failure to apply the death penalty.”
Oh, they have...they have killed hundreds of thousands of innocent babies...isn’t that enough blood for you?
“Premeditated murder should have gotten this nut case the death penalty.”
It did, Roeder carried out the sentence when the justice system failed.
“Er, the guy shot a man down in cold blood in front of dozens of witnesses, and admitted it later. Not sure how he could “prove his innocence” in this case....”
If the defense is “justifiable homicide” then being technically guilty of the act doesn’t come into it.
Kansas didn’t allow for that kind of defense apparently, so Roeder will have to be satisfied being judged by a “higher authority.” As will we all.
“It sounds like you consider fetuses to be living persons. If so, do you believe he was morally justified though legally guilty of the crime?”
He was not legally guilty of murder. The “law” that allows the mass murder of innocent babies is an illegal act. It violates Natural Law (God’s Law). Natural Law transcends national law as witnessed in the Nuremberg trials following World War ll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.