Posted on 02/18/2010 5:36:35 PM PST by paulycy
Bill 0'Reilly, interviewing the founder of Oath Keepers, questioned Oath Keeper's opposition to the govt confiscating guns - or even discussing the issue in public. B0R implied there was some violent, subversive agenda to even discussing the issue and stated plainly that any mayor - such as in New Orleans after Katrina - had a perfect right to confiscate guns because they had to maintain "control" or "anarchy" would result.
He went off my radar after Al Capone’s safe !
No one said anything about voting for BORe, asshat. The comment was about numbskulls who vote for third party losers. Get it?
There was nothing in my post about voting for anyone.
Your rude remark was posted in reply to my post.
So now you are making clear that you just blurt out your brilliant remarks with no reference to anything.
That hardly adds anything to the knowledge pool, other than the knowledge that your comments are wild shots in the dark immaterial to the topic at hand.
The problem with the tea party is in your mirror.
Really?
You don’t like the way the elections went in MA, NJ and VA?
explain to me how gun control and libertarianism can even exist in the same sentence.
I definitely don’t like what the nitwits are doing in the 8th district in TN. They will hand the district right to the dems. The wonderful candidate they support is an FDR dem running as a republican
BOR as an elitist shows just who works for who.
Sadly enough he totes some truth there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.