Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Republicans draw support, concern at CPAC
(State-controlled) CNN.com ^ | February 19, 2010 | Brianna Keilar

Posted on 02/20/2010 12:36:18 PM PST by USALiberty

An unlikely sponsor at this year's annual conservative conference is hoping to not only promote the issues that set it apart from many Republicans, but also draw attention to the beliefs they share.

The group is called GOProud -- a name that combines GOP and gay pride. So far, the group is getting a mixed response at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cpac; cpac2010; fudgepac; gays; goproud; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: USALiberty

Here comes the hyphenated conservative, and with it, divisiveness by it’s very nature, but then, that’s the whole point isn’t it....


41 posted on 02/20/2010 1:47:52 PM PST by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Gag me, gag me, gonna take a rope and hang me. Who said something similar? His name is on the tip of my tongue.


42 posted on 02/20/2010 1:48:23 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Wasn’t that a silly song from Roger Miller? Or was it Jimmy Dean?


43 posted on 02/20/2010 1:54:12 PM PST by Theodore R. (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

This gay group is not some innocent little coffee klatsch that stays quietly behind closed doors. The group has a radical liberal agenda.

The group wants to repeal don’t ask, don’t tell — which grievously undermine the world’s greatest military.

The group opposes the federal marriage amendment even though such an amendment is essential to religious freedom. It would help stop the attacks of activist judges on religious freedom and traditional values.

The group says that hate crime and employment legislation are “worthy goals.”

The group is for “domestic partner tax equity” — domestic partner is another word for shacking up. Another nail in the coffin for traditional marriage.

This gay group is nothing but trouble. CPAC should not be giving it credibility.


44 posted on 02/20/2010 1:56:33 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Would this group not be supported by Dick Cheney? They have an advocate in the former vp. Not sure how Liz Cheney feels, but I assume it would be along the same lines. It’s the one thing that disappoints me about him, even though I understand he has his daughter to consider.


45 posted on 02/20/2010 2:17:23 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

The fact that his daughter is homosexual is no excuse. A parent’s love is unconditional but that is no reason to embrace the homosexual agenda - to the detriment of the military.


46 posted on 02/20/2010 2:30:30 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty; SevenofNine

47 posted on 02/20/2010 2:37:27 PM PST by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

I honestly don’t understand why we in anyway need cohesiveness the matter of “gay rights” or really almost any other Inherently domestic political matter.

If we all agree to embrace limited constitutional government theses matters will be resolved at the State and local level where we do agree more....

I don’t see this as being a justifiably relevant dispute.


48 posted on 02/20/2010 3:28:12 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

They are moderate democrats, is all. Nothing conservative there.


49 posted on 02/20/2010 4:34:21 PM PST by darkangel82 (I don't have a superiority complex, I'm just better than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

Except that they’re pretending to be something else. I don’t even know about “moderate” Democrats.


50 posted on 02/20/2010 4:40:07 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise
I honestly don’t understand why we in anyway need cohesiveness the matter of “gay rights”

Because conservatives either stand for traditional Christian values or they stand for nothing, that's why. Our nation's problems are DIRECTLY tied to moral relativism and our abandonment of God's Law in favor of the ideas of men.
51 posted on 02/20/2010 6:26:39 PM PST by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
Even in Jimmy Carter's day, "moderate Democrats" would have viewed that list as very immoderate.
52 posted on 02/20/2010 8:34:23 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson