Posted on 02/25/2010 12:56:50 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist
Israel receives military and financial assistance, and also some diplomatic support at the United Nations, but the US puts pressure on Israel to surrender parts of the homeland... It seems to me a Ron Paul presidency would be good for Israel and for the United States. Its foreign policy non-interventionism and its concern to protect national sovereignty would provide Israel with a greater impetus to increase its own independence and sense of national honor. I hope American Zionists will resist the immediate, meretricious attractions of American financial assistance for Israel. Ron Paul would both end this infantilizing, and even corrupting, aid and respect Israel's national sovereignty. Taking the long and deep view, Ron Paul should be the Zionist choice."
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
How can anybody trust libertarians when their favorite
“son” loads up legislation that he knows will pass and
gives the pork while giggling “I voted against it.”?
***
Shrimp boats Is Acomin
Their Sails are in sight.
Shrimp Boats is acomin
there will be dancing tonight.
** Ron Paul version.
Shrimp Boats is acomin
Their pork is in sight.
Shrimp Boats is acomin
They will be drugged up tonight.
Doesn't matter.
Your time has come and gone, and now you are being uprooted and replaced by the new blood: The Palin/Paul Alliance.
Your Paul-hatred is old and obsolete. You are being replaced and assimilated.
When Rand Paul wins the GOP Primary in Kentucky, you will support Rand Paul against the Democrats; and when Sarah Palin wins the GOP Primary in 2012, you will support Sarah Palin against the Democrats.
The Palin/Paul Alliance is the New Future of Conservatism in America.
what does any of this have to do with Ron Paul? He rationalizes the terrorists
Ron Paul is the only US Congressman who proposes Total Abolition of all Foreign Aid, thus allowing the Israelis total freedom of military action in their own defense.
As the Article above proves, Israel would be better off if they acted in their own defense, without reference to US Foreign Aid.
Therefore, TRUE Pro-Zionists should support Ron and Rand Paul, and Sarah Palin. As do I!!!
and how will this deal with Iran’s nukes?
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2006/cr040506.htm
Regardless, I can put my finger in the air, and see how the wind is a-blowin'.
As goes Sarah Palin, so goes Free Republic.
The Palin/Paul Alliance is advancing, and the Paul-Haters are receding.
Just the way it's gonna be.
Could be just me though.
Not my problem.
And if Israel wants to destroy Iran's nukes, then I would continue to look the other way and say, "Not my Problem".
I favor zero Foreign Aid to Israel, and total Israeli Freedom of Action. Let them nuke whomsoever they need to, to defend their own existence. I'm fine with that.
“Not my problem.”
they will be your problem once they are given to terrorists and used against US cities.
The Palin/Paul Alliance is advancing, and the Paul-Haters are receding.
Just the way it's gonna be.
This one...
"Your time has come and gone, and now you are being uprooted and replaced by the new blood: The Palin/Paul Alliance. Your Paul-hatred is old and obsolete. You are being replaced and assimilated."
(Too danged early for this. I'm going for coffee.)
Not if Israel nukes 'em first, twit.
Iran is a bigger danger to Israel than they are to us.
So, I propose letting Israel deal with them.
Oooh, look at that. Didn't that used to be "Iran"? It sure glows pretty.
“Not if Israel nukes ‘em first, twit.”
Israel doesn’t have B2 bombers. Fortunately it does have...American made planes that can be used.
Frag the planes, I was talking about Jericho IIB IRBMs.
"Goodbye, Mecca" anytime that Israel feels theatened. The ultimate Samson Option.
The way things oughtta be.
Ron Paul endorsed the TRAITOR Adam Kokesh!
RON PAUL:THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS AND TRAITORS!!
Sarah Palin-Rand Paul in 2010.
We win; the Paul-Haters lose.
Get used to it.
Froth all you want. Here's the facts:
The truth of the matter is, there has been a loose alliance between the Palin camp and the Paul camp going back at least 4 years. Just as there was a loose alliance between the RonPaulist libertarians and the Reagan Republicans back in 1976 and 1980. This isn't a "rivalry". It's a political alliance.
The Palin/Paul Alliance. The New Definition of American Conservatism.
Get used to it. We own the future.
---------
"Get used to it."
You're mighty bossy for someone who's been here for less than a month, (under the current screen name at least), aren't you?
Which groups are you attempting to play against each other?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.