Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Knocks "Em Dead on 'Tonight Show'
Big Hollywood ^ | March 4, 2010 | John Nolte

Posted on 03/04/2010 8:53:24 PM PST by This Just In

Wow. This audience loves her and only grows to love her more as the interview rolls on. About ten minutes in she shows more guts than any politician maybe ever by agreeing to make her stand up debut … on The Tonight Show … in front of a Los Angeles audience. What poise.

If Sarah Palin can win over this audience in this way in one of the bluest regions of the country, if I were Barbara Boxer I’d be pretty worried right now.

Something’s in the air.

Kudos as always to Jay Leno for being the consummate gentlemen. During the interview he’s curious, respectful, let’s her talk, and just probing enough for this kind of setting. Imagine David Letterman in this situation. With one eye on impressing his fellow Manhattan Elites, he’d have been a nauseating mixture of lecherous and cruel. Jon Stewart would’ve made a lot of faces, Bill Maher’s head would’ve exploded, and Stephen Colbert would’ve made fun of Trig.

If Leno thought the Beautiful People were out to get him before, his respectful treatment of Sarah Palin should forever seal his fate as The Outsider. He must have missed the Hollywood Memo declaring that its child-raping directors you make look good, not self-made governors.

UPDATE: Ed Morrisey makes a keen observation:

The Right Scoop captured last night’s canny performance from Sarah Palin on Jay Leno’s renewed Tonight Show. How canny? She manages to tie her treatment by the media to the mostly unfair treatment Leno himself got from the entertainment media, a good way to gain the audience’s sympathy.

Yup. Just keep underestimating our Sarah.

(Excerpt) Read more at bighollywood.breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; leno; obama; palin; palinleno; politics; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

:’) Thanks This Just In.


61 posted on 03/05/2010 4:57:45 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

I’m glad she is getting the opportunity for the rest of America, those that watch the LSM, to see for themselves that she is NOT what they portrayed her to be during the campaign. Go Sarah!


62 posted on 03/05/2010 5:08:32 AM PST by Qwackertoo (I'm really thrilled that Scott Brown WON Big Time Last Night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Bump for later.


63 posted on 03/05/2010 5:11:30 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Whats with no wedding ring on Sarah???


64 posted on 03/05/2010 5:11:56 AM PST by bt579 (America elected a reader when it needs a leader. Clean the House in 2010, Right the Wrong in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Perhaps California is not-so-blue as we might think these days. Maybe they are getting their light-bulb moment. No one said anything about Sarah having an effect on the CA race, just making an observation that perhaps CA is a bit more receptive to “red” than we thought.


65 posted on 03/05/2010 5:12:54 AM PST by Qwackertoo (I'm really thrilled that Scott Brown WON Big Time Last Night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
We're not bad people at all; some of us just have twisted senses of humor sometimes.

Sometimes?

66 posted on 03/05/2010 5:15:29 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Crim
As an FR poster...I'd appreciate you not attempting to dicate what is or is not a valid source...I'll decide for myself thanks..

How Jeffersonian of you!

67 posted on 03/05/2010 5:24:09 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

Welcome to FR


68 posted on 03/05/2010 5:25:34 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Our politicians are stupid and our policies unsustainable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Allegra; Eaker
We're not bad people at all; some of us just have twisted senses of humor sometimes. (Guilty.)

Wait, what?

69 posted on 03/05/2010 5:37:41 AM PST by glock rocks (Wait, what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jla
Jefferson was a war criminal...

He sent the marines to the shores of Tripoli without congressional approval.. /sarc

70 posted on 03/05/2010 5:47:35 AM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: no dems

By the way, the AGIA begins its “open season” in April, accepting bids for commitments on slots on Palin’s Trans-Canada natural gas pipline. This is the key step in getting the largest construction project in North American history off the ground (....or, in the ground).


71 posted on 03/05/2010 6:03:54 AM PST by cookcounty (Let us not speak of the honor of men. Rather, let us bind them with the Constitution. --Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Well I certainly don’t give a lot of my time to thinking about that repulsive little troll known as Bill Maher, I do occasionally wonder if he’s bitter because he’s ugly, or if it’s his very bitterness that makes him ugly.


72 posted on 03/05/2010 6:08:11 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

I’D PAY TO SEE THAT MYSELF.


73 posted on 03/05/2010 6:20:36 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Maybe you should ping the old sour puss

Surely you don't mean Old Dick Hand?

74 posted on 03/05/2010 6:26:30 AM PST by genetic homophobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Boy you sure missed the point on that one


75 posted on 03/05/2010 6:37:11 AM PST by genetic homophobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex; onyx
This is Mr. Robinson's site and, unquestionably, he's free to run it as he see fits. That's the beauty of free-market capitalism. But as a Christian, I'd like to suggest that referencing hillbuzz as a source be disallowed here on FR.

I would like to suggest you read the constitution, the part about free speech. On second thought, you should read the whole thing and try to understand that censoring someone's speech is not in the interest of freedom. As you said, this is the Robinson's site and they can either allow or disallow whatever they want. Hopefully they won't start barring people simply because they reference a quote from a liberal site.

76 posted on 03/05/2010 6:47:33 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: onyx; re_nortex
"What do I have here? A concern troll? LOL."

Yep, you snagged a troll. Good job.

77 posted on 03/05/2010 8:27:17 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
lol -- give him a wedgie instead; he'd look like Erkel.

Ha!

President Erkel!

What you wanna bet that with his Titanic sized and fragile ego, this would cause that little man's head to explode?
78 posted on 03/05/2010 8:42:48 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol
When a Person repeats they are a Christian, mentions the talking points, Bible, etc. they are convincing themselves more than others.

Or maybe they are just attempting to serve their Lord.

79 posted on 03/05/2010 8:57:20 AM PST by oneaglewings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: calex59
As you said, this is the Robinson's site and they can either allow or disallow whatever they want. Hopefully they won't start barring people simply because they reference a quote from a liberal site.

Quite right on all points. In the fresh light of a new day, my posting last night concerning HillBuzz was, at best, a cranky, ham-fisted ``get off my lawn!'' moment.

My fault is that I reacted viscerally and emotionally both to the image of Hillary Clinton and to the ``Boystown'' link over there and should have counted to 10 (or maybe 20) before hitting the ``Post'' button. Like many here, I found the article at HillBuzz about George Bush in the wake of the Ft. Hood terrorist attack deeply moving. I think that is more the measure of those people and I should have remembered that.

In the lively exchange of ideas and opinions here on FR (which I've used as a source of news since 9/11/2001, albeit only a recent poster), disallowing certain sources to be cited would make this venue little more than an echo chamber.

80 posted on 03/05/2010 9:14:36 AM PST by re_nortex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson