Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What About Abortion in Cases of Rape and Incest? Women and Sexual Assault
Life News ^ | 4/5/10 | Amy Sobie

Posted on 04/05/2010 3:13:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

LifeNews.com Note: Amy Sobie is the editor of The Post-Abortion Review, a quarterly publication of the Elliot Institute. The organization is a widely respected leader in research and analysis of medical, mental health and other complications resulting from abortions.

April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. Many people, including those whose mission is to help women and girls who are victims of sexual assault and abuse, believe abortion is the best solution if a pregnancy occurs.

Yet our research shows that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault don't want abortion, and say abortion only compounds their trauma.

“How can you deny an abortion to a twelve-year-old girl who is the victim of incest?”

Typically, people on both sides of the abortion debate accept the premise that most women who become pregnant through sexual assault want abortions. From this “fact,” it naturally follows that the reason women want abortions in these cases is because it will help them to put the assault behind them, recover more quickly, and avoid the additional trauma of giving birth to a “rapist’s child.”

But in fact, the welfare of a mother and her child are never at odds, even in sexual assault cases. As the stories of many women confirm, both the mother and the child are helped by preserving life, not by perpetuating violence.

Sadly, however, the testimonies of women who have actually been pregnant through sexual assault are routinely left out of this public debate. Many people, including sexual assault victims who have never been pregnant, may be forming opinions based on their own prejudices and fears rather than the real life experiences of those people who have been in this difficult situation and reality.

For example, it is commonly assumed that rape victims who become pregnant would naturally want abortions. But in the only major study of pregnant rape victims ever done prior to this book, Dr. Sandra Mahkorn found that 75 to 85 percent did not have abortions. This figure is remarkably similar to the 73 percent birth rate found in our sample of 164 pregnant rape victims. This one finding alone should cause people to pause and reflect on the presumption that abortion is wanted or even best for sexual assault victims.1

Several reasons were given for not aborting. Many women who become pregnant through sexual assault do not believe in abortion, believing it would be a further act of violence perpetrated against their bodies and their children. Further, many believe that their children’s lives may have some intrinsic meaning or purpose which they do not yet understand. This child was brought into their lives by a horrible, repulsive act. But perhaps God, or fate, will use the child for some greater purpose. Good can come from evil.

The woman may also sense, at least at a subconscious level, that if she can get through the pregnancy she will have conquered the rape. By giving birth, she can reclaim some of her lost self-esteem. Giving birth, especially when conception was not desired, is a totally selfless act, a generous act, a display of courage, strength, and honor. It is proof that she is better than the rapist. While he was selfish, she can be generous. While he destroyed, she can nurture.

Adding to the Trauma

Many people assume that abortion will at least help a rape victim put the assault behind her and get on with her life. But evidence shows that abortion is not some magical surgery which turns back the clock to make a woman “un-pregnant.”

Instead, it is a real life event which is always very stressful and often traumatic. Once we accept that abortion is itself an event with deep ramifications for a woman’s life, then we must look carefully at the special circumstances of the pregnant sexual assault victim. Evidence indicates that abortion doesn't help and only causes further injury to an already bruised psyche?

But before we even get to this issue, we must ask: do most women who become pregnant as a result of sexual assault want to abort?

In our survey of women who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, many women who underwent abortions indicated that they felt pressured or were strongly directed by family members or health care workers to have abortions. The abortion came about not because of the woman's desire to abort but as a response to the suggestions or demands of others. In many cases, resources such as health workers, counselors and others who are normally there to help women after sexual assault pushed for abortion.

Family pressure, withholding of support and resources that the woman needed to continue the pregnancy, manipulative an inadequate counseling and other problems all played a role into pushing women into abortions, even though abortion was often not what the woman really wanted.

Further, in almost every case involving incest, it was the girl's parents or the perpetrator who made the decision and arrangements for the abortion, not the girl herself. None of these women reported having any input into the decision. Each was simply expected to comply with the choice of others. In several cases, the abortion was carried out over the objections of the girl, who clearly told others that wanted to continue the pregnancy. In a few cases, victim was not even clearly aware that she was pregnant or that the abortion was being carried out.

"Medical Rape"

Second, although many people believe that abortion will help a woman resolve the trauma of rape more quickly, or at least keep her from being reminded of the rape throughout her pregnancy, many of the women in our survey who had abortions reported that abortion only added to and accentuated the traumatic feelings associated with sexual assault.

This is easy to understand when one considers that many women have described their abortions as being similar to a rape (and even used the term "medical rape), it is easy to see that abortion is likely to add a second trauma to the earlier trauma of sexual assault. Abortion involves an often painful intrusion into a woman’s sexual organs by a masked stranger who is invading her body. Once she is on the operating table, she loses control over her body. Even if she protests and asks the abortionist to stop, chances are she will be either ignored or told that it's too late to stop the abortion.

For many women this experiential association between abortion and sexual assault is very strong. It is especially strong for women who have a prior history of sexual assault, whether or not the aborted child was conceived during an act of assault. This is just one reason why women with a history of sexual assault are likely to experience greater distress during and after an abortion than are other women.

Research also shows that women who abort and women who are raped often describe similar feelings of depression, guilt, lowered self-esteem, violation and resentment of men. Rather than easing the psychological burdens experienced by those who have been raped, abortion added to them. Jackie wrote:

I soon discovered that the aftermath of my abortion continued a long time after the memory of my rape had faded. I felt empty and horrible. Nobody told me about the pain I would feel deep within causing nightmares and deep depressions. They had all told me that after the abortion I could continue my life as if nothing had happened.2

Those encouraging, pushing or insisting on abortion often do so because they are uncomfortable dealing with sexual assault victims, or perhaps because they harbor some prejudice against victims whom they feel “let it happen.” Wiping out the pregnancy is a way of hiding the problem. It is a “quick and easy” way to avoid dealing with the woman’s true emotional, social and financial needs. As Kathleen wrote:

I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child “conceived in rape,” feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side of the story.

Trapping the Incest Victim

The case against abortion for incest pregnancies is even stronger. Studies show that incest victims rarely ever voluntarily agree to abortion. Instead of viewing the pregnancy as unwanted, the incest victim is more likely to see the pregnancy as a way out of the incestuous relationship because the birth of her child will expose the sexual activity. She is also likely to see in her pregnancy the hope of bearing a child with whom she can establish a truly loving relationship, one far different than the exploitive relationship in which she has been trapped.

But while the girl may see her pregnancy as a possible way of release from her situation, it poses a threat to her abuser. It is also poses a threat to the pathological secrecy which may envelop other members of the family who are afraid to acknowledge the abuse. Because of this dual threat, the victim may be coerced or forced into an unwanted abortion by both the abuser and other family members.

For example, Edith, a 12-year-old victim of incest impregnated by her stepfather, writes twenty-five years after the abortion of her child:

Throughout the years I have been depressed, suicidal, furious, outraged, lonely, and have felt a sense of loss . . . The abortion which was to “be in my best interest” just has not been. As far as I can tell, it only ‘saved their reputations,’ ‘solved their problems,’ and ‘allowed their lives to go merrily on.’ . . . My daughter, how I miss her so. I miss her regardless of the reason for her conception."

Abortion businesses who routinely ignore this evidence and neglect to interview minors presented for abortion for signs of coercion or incest are actually contributing to the victimization of young girls. Not only are they robbing the victim of her child, they are concealing a crime, abetting a perpetrator, and handing the victim back to her abuser so that the exploitation can continue.

For example, the parents of three teenaged Baltimore girls pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree rape and child sexual abuse. The father had repeatedly raped the three girls over a period of at least nine years, and the rapes were covered up by at least ten abortions. At least five of the abortions were performed by the same abortionist at the same clinic.3

Sadly, there is strong evidence that failing to ask questions about the pregnancy and to report cases of sexual abuse are widespread at abortion clinics. Undercover investigations by pro-life groups have found numerous cases in which clinics agreed to cover up cases of statutory rape or ongoing abuse of minor girls by older men and simply perform an abortion instead.

In 2002 a judge found a Planned Parenthood affiliate in Arizona negligent for failing to report a case in which a 13-year-old girl was impregnated and taken for an abortion by her 23-year-old foster brother. The abortion business did not notify authorities until the girl returned six months later for a second abortion. A lawsuit alleged that the girl was subjected to repeated abuse and a second abortion because Planned Parenthood failed to notify authorities when she had her first abortion. The girl's foster brother was later imprisoned for abusing her.4

Finally, we must recognize that children conceived through sexual assault also deserve to have their voices heard. Rebecca Wasser-Kiessling, who was conceived in a rape, is rightfully proud of her mother’s courage and generosity and wisely reminds us of a fundamental truth that transcends biological paternity: “I believe that God rewarded my birth mother for the suffering she endured, and that I am a gift to her. The serial rapist is not my creator; God is.”

Similarly, Julie Makimaa, who works diligently against the perception that abortion is acceptable or even necessary in cases of sexual assault, proclaims, “It doesn't matter how I began. What matters is who I will become.”

That’s a slogan we can all live with.


Citations

1. Mahkorn, "Pregnancy and Sexual Assault," The Psychological Aspects of Abortion, eds. Mall & Watts, (Washington, D.C., University Publications of America, 1979) 55-69.

2. David C. Reardon, Aborted Women, Silent No More (Chicago, IL: Loyola University Press, 1987), 206.

3. Jean Marbella, "Satisfactory explanations of sex crime proved elusive," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31, 1990; M. Dion Thompson, "GBMC, doctor suspected nothing amiss," Baltimore Sun, Oct. 31. 1990; "Family Horror Comes to Light in Story of Girls Raped by Father," Baltimore Sun, November 4, 1990; Raymond L. Sanchez, "Mother Sentenced in Rape Case," Baltimore Sun, Dec. 6, 1990.

4. "Planned Parenthood Found Negligent in Reporting Molested Teen's Abortion," Pro-Life Infonet, attributed to Associated Press; Dec. 26, 2002.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; prolife; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 521-524 next last
To: wagglebee

Excellent post.


301 posted on 04/06/2010 1:25:43 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (Liberals love the poor so much they came up w/ a plan to create millions more of them. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
The problem is that you are NOT arguing the scriptural position.

So you, Eagle Eye, and Hank Kerchief say. But why should we take your word for it? Frankly, I choose what I understand from my reading of the Bible through prayer and supplication for understanding. And I disagree sincerely with the lot of you. You disagree with us. So be it.

But I will take my understanding and feel very comfortable with it, knowing I will never, ever, argue on the side of allowing abortions to happen because it's wrong for government to intervene one way or another.

As someone Hank invited here pointed out, perhaps the best way is to end the debate and go to God in prayer that all people see the wisdom in ending the abomination that is abortion.

Good day.

302 posted on 04/06/2010 1:26:16 PM PDT by bcsco (Obama: Hokus Pokus POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
You seem to have made a moral judgment about me based on a single post in defense of the arguments made by another poster.

No, I haven't. You have INFERRED that I have, and blame me for your inference.
Again, "you" are defending from a non-attack.
Go ahead and punch at shadows if you please.

Back to the issue. Abortion. The occurrences of abortion before the heart starts beating, if you want to use that as a starting point, are nil.
THERE IS NO REASON TO BEAT THIS DEAD HORSE.

303 posted on 04/06/2010 1:28:51 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

You’re telling everyone to back off on the invectives against another poster and are totally SILENT on the invectives BY the other poster.

Why chastise so one sidedly?


304 posted on 04/06/2010 1:29:07 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

The fetus is alive whether there is blood in it or not.

Saying that the life is in the blood does not say that without blood there is no life.


305 posted on 04/06/2010 1:29:46 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Because there is no expectation of the other side backing off of the invectives...


306 posted on 04/06/2010 1:30:05 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Why chastise so one sidedly?

Frankly metmom, it is because I know you and I don't know Eagle Eye.

I hold you to a higher standard.

307 posted on 04/06/2010 1:30:57 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
If it is wrong, it cannot be a valid argument.

Obviously you are not a lawyer.

308 posted on 04/06/2010 1:55:16 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
So let's knock off the invective diatribes against Eagle Eye on this point.

Wow. Thanks x 10!

309 posted on 04/06/2010 4:58:00 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
Abortion is not murder of a human being

Then what is it?

310 posted on 04/06/2010 4:59:38 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

My mother in law told me why she is a believer in abortion. As a nurse, before abortion was legalized, she had a 12 year old patient that was raped by her step father, and became pregnant. She said she didn’t think that it was fair for that child to have to have that baby.

I pointed out, that since the girl could not have an anonymous abortion, the rape was discovered and the perp was sent to prison! Legalization didn’t help this little girl. The fact that abortion was illegal helped this child!

If this had happened after legal “safe” abortion, the man would, as many have since legalization; forced the girl to have an abortion at planned parenthood, and kept on abusing her! As it is, the abuse was stopped.

The girl actually was able under the pre-1974 laws of Washington State to have an abortion....in a hospital, with the full knowledge of her mother, and the police.

I wonder how she is now? Bless her heart.


311 posted on 04/06/2010 5:02:49 PM PDT by tuckrdout ("Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."--MLK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Any failure to meet full expectations and one is lumped in with abortion doctors.

I really, truly find it a wrong and distasteful procedure but I’m tired of smears against those who don’t toe the line.

Any politician that wants to eliminate 98-99% of all abortions some how is labeled as pro abort.

It is the race card for this issue.


312 posted on 04/06/2010 5:08:37 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

“’Abortion is not murder of a human being’

Then what is it?”

Check your dictionary. I’ll not do your homework for you.

Hank


313 posted on 04/06/2010 5:21:32 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
“’Abortion is not murder of a human being’

Then what is it?”

Check your dictionary. I’ll not do your homework for you.

First I'lll check with Exodus 21:

22 "When men have a fight and hurt a pregnant woman, so that she suffers a miscarriage, but no further injury, the guilty one shall be fined as much as the woman's husband demands of him, and he shall pay in the presence of the judges.

At least the Jews then understood that the unborn have some validity. Let us consider the wisdom of: http://socyberty.com/languages/merriam-webster-says-abortion-is-murder/

Merriam-Webster Dictionary Says that abortion is:

1: the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus: as a: spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus during the first 12 weeks of gestation

Question: what about the remaining 28 weeks? Is it then murder?

When reading this definition the word termination sticks out. Let’s define termination

1: end in time or existence

Wow, the end of an existence. Now the definition of abortion also states that it is the DEATH of the embryo or fetus. To die, wouldn’t that mean it were alive? Also it states that it is “spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus”. Wow, it is human after all.

Read more in Languages: « “Sheeps” of a Feather Flock Together10 Tips for Learning Languages in a Fun Way »Let’s try the word existence.

C (1): the totality of existent things

(2): a particular being

d: sentient or living being

Now we know what a living being is. We can understand what a particular being means. What about the word sentient?

1: responsive to or conscious of sense impressions

2: AWARE

3: finely sensitive in perception or feeling

So then it would be aware, responsive to or conscious of sense impressions. (That doesn’t mean that the embryo can read, write or breathe on its own. It means it can sense impressions.) I like the word aware also. But how about “finely sensitive in perception or feeling”? We obviously cannot prove that by just looking up words in the dictionary, can we?

Now let’s try Merriam-Webster’s Medical Dictionary on abortion.

1: the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus: a: spontaneous expulsion of a human fetus during the first 12 weeks of gestation b: induced expulsion of a human fetus c: expulsion of a fetus of a domestic animal often due to infection at any time before completion of pregnancy

The animals do this because of an infection. Hmm. Now we are still seeing the word termination. We are still seeing the word death. And the phrase induced expulsion of a HUMAN fetus sounds rather, I don’t know, unnatural. Let’s look up the word induced.

1: to cause or bring about : as a (1): to cause the embryological formation of (2): to cause to form through embryonic induction b: to cause or initiate by artificial means

Obviously we are seeing a lot of the word “caused” in this definition. I am not going to define cause for you but if you want to look it up click here.

So to cause, or induce, is to act or participate in a procedure. (When performing an abortion.) To induce something you must be doing an action that causes that action to be done. Now remember, an abortion means termination. Inducing an abortion means you are terminating the embryo. The medical definition of embryo is:

1archaic: a vertebrate at any stage of development prior to birth or hatching2: an animal in the early stages of growth and differentiation that are characterized by cleavage, the laying down of fundamental tissues, and the formation of primitive organs and organ systems; especially: the developing human individual from the time of implantation to the end of the eighth week after conception

So inducing an abortion and terminating an abortion is the same thing. An embryo dies during this process. The embryo is in fact a “developing human individual from the time of implantation” and with it being a “human individual” that means it is in fact alive and human. So…

Inducing an abortion is terminating a human individual. What do we call it when someone terminates another person? Murder. What do we call it when someone kills a bunch of people? Serial killings. (Like Charles Manson) What do we call it when a lot of human beings are killed for a selfish reason? Genocide.

To wrap it up, thanks to the wisdom and knowledge of Merriam-Webster, we have successfully concluded that, by definition alone, abortion is murder. Those who provide it (or induce it) are murders. Those who do it a lot are serial killers. And since there are a massive amount of these going on that means it is genocide.

You're welcome. I've found somebody who has done your homework for you.

314 posted on 04/06/2010 5:52:08 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
I really, truly find it a wrong and distasteful procedure but I’m tired of smears against those who don’t toe the line.

Sometimes people get a bit carried away in their zeal. My own view on this subject is that abortion is always wrong, but from a biblical viewpoint it is clear that a fetus is not treated the same in biblical law as a baby. Additionally those who are pro-life, while making the case that abortion is murder, are not all the hot on the idea of sending teenage mothers to the gas chamber, whereas they are willing to see to it that doctors who perform abortions are executed.

Unfortunately the whole philosophical/theological debate is somewhat cloudy. I don't think we will ever get to the point where every abortion is considered a murder, (I don't think the most ardent pro-lifers are willing to argue that point), but I think a reasonable compromise (if a compromise is possible) would be to outlaw all abortions where there is a shedding of innocent blood. Therefore I would suspect that in order to make that claim, there has to be a detectable heartbeat. IMO once a heartbeat is detected, then the mother needs to either start loading up on diapers or contacting an adoption agency.

I think I can argue that position on a biblical basis.

315 posted on 04/06/2010 6:45:19 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Then there are women who will die in order to give birth to a child. God Bless St. Gianna Molla!

Catholic Health Center for Women Opens in Manhattan (Gianna Center)
Daughter of Saint Gianna Beretta Molla Attends US March for Life
A patron saint for life (Gianna Beretta Molla)

Pope Canonizes Gianna Molla; Secular Media at a Loss
Bl. Gianna Beretta Molla
Gianna Beretta, Who Died for Her Unborn Child, to Be Canonized (She Refused Cancer Treatment)
Gianna Beretta Molla Offered Life For Her [Unborn]Child
Blessed Gianna[Gianna Beretta Molla]

316 posted on 04/06/2010 7:52:32 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
I am reminded of why I believe that the next libertarian who impresses me with intellect and flawless reasoning will be the first. You provided me with someone's impressive pro-life credentials, then set about making it impossible to believe that they are yours. You claim that you have done all these things in support of a cause you can't possibly feel that strongly about. You insert the God and the Bible into the conversation in order to directly quote prominent prominent abortion opponents. The idea that "the Bible doesn't support conception" is just plain dopey. We're not talking about Islam here. Very little of the Bible is the actual Word of God. The people who wrote the Bible had no concept of conception. Microscopes hadn't been invented yet. The theory at the time was that sperm was a seed which implanted in the womb. There are plenty of Biblicals to back that up. There are also plenty of lines refer to the unborn as human beings. Meanwhile, nowhere that I am aware of does the Bible specifically declare that the unborn are in any way less than human. Nowhere.

And I have to address this line directly:

The Bible doesn’t support a miscarriage (another name for abortion) as murder. Abortions are INDUCED miscarriages. Calling abortion the same thing as miscarriage is like calling strangulation the same thing as suffocation. The point of contention with abortion is that another human being made it happen.

Any rudeness I exhibited towards you in my earlier post was the result of my equal exasperations at libertarians and other people who can't help making illogical arguments. I don't know you personally. You probabally are a decent guy generally. But I'll repeat myself: There is no reason to oppose abortion, unless you think it's the same thing as murder. If it's anything less, then the mother's rights trump all arguments. If abortion isn't murder, it's no different from plastic surgery, or putting you cat to sleep: No one's business but my own. If a human life is, in fact, at stake, there can be no logical argument FOR abortion. Ever. Including the fact that woman's father forcibly impregnated her. If you have any trouble with this line of reasoning, then thanks for your previous help fighting abortions. You are relieved of your duty. You were always pro-choice. You just haven't figured it out yet. Artificial wombs are coming in the next decade. That should be extra confusing for people like you.

The fact that I have to explain all of this to you makes me wonder whether you are telling the truth about all that pro-life activism. You say you "hate abortion, never encourage it, hope to never see it happen." Why?

They don’t mind heaping condemnation on women who are making the hardest and sometimes worst decisions of their lives.

Abortion is always the worst (and last) episode in one person's life. We condemn the women who have them for one reason, plain and simple: The are murdering their own child for being inconvenient.

317 posted on 04/06/2010 8:10:24 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Excellent points all.....


318 posted on 04/06/2010 9:03:40 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ, and thank you for that beautiful Scripture!


319 posted on 04/06/2010 9:42:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Again, thank you so very much for the beautiful Scripture and all your insights, dear brother in Christ!


320 posted on 04/06/2010 9:59:35 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 521-524 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson