Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GAO warns future of automaker pensions "uncertain"
AP on Yahoo ^ | 4/6/10 | Stephen Manning - ap

Posted on 04/06/2010 2:56:21 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – Automakers General Motors and Chrysler will need to put billions of dollars into their pension plans over the next five years to meet their funding requirements, the Government Accountablity Office said Tuesday.

The GAO concluded that GM will have to add $12.3 billion by 2014, while Chrysler is expected to need $2.62 billion more during that time for its pension plan to keep it properly funded.

GM and Chrysler both went through government-orchestrated Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last year. They emerged as newly restructured companies that were able to shed huge debts but remained responsible for the pension plans of thousands of workers and retirees.

The GAO said in a report that the future of those plans "remains uncertain" as the companies struggle to make money again.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: automakers; chrysler; gao; generalmotors; pensions; retirement; seniors; taxes; uaw; uncertain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 04/06/2010 2:56:21 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And this is with cooked numbers....???


2 posted on 04/06/2010 2:58:11 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Baseball, hot dogs, Barack Obama and Chevrolet!


3 posted on 04/06/2010 2:58:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This will probably result in “Since the government can require you to buy things you don’t want, everyone must buy a new Chevy, whether you want one or not.” After all, GM does belong to the gov’t, and it is “too big to fail.”


4 posted on 04/06/2010 2:59:04 PM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Fantastic point; just imagine when they get to use the forced healthcare and taxation monies to funnel towards these programs, will be better than Social Security plus any other ponzi scheme they have come up with.


5 posted on 04/06/2010 3:00:59 PM PDT by ntmxx (I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

GM: Obama’s Lada.


6 posted on 04/06/2010 3:04:24 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How about some of those union members paying me some money for the cr*p they built for me back in the days that I was stupid enough to purchase GM cars.


7 posted on 04/06/2010 3:04:50 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

>> everyone must buy a new Chevy, whether you want one or not

I don’t think Bambi will be quite THAT harsh.

If you really don’t want the car, he’ll probably instead let you adopt-a-UAW and pay his mortgage and his healthcare and his pension.

Or you can buy the Chevy — your choice. And those ‘rats, they’re ALL about free choice!


8 posted on 04/06/2010 3:07:49 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Eat more spinach! Make Green Jobs for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Give ‘em Oboma money - from his private stash.


9 posted on 04/06/2010 3:09:56 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This is exactly why GM should have been allowed to go through a standard chap 11 bankruptcy. They need to jettison their Retirement/Legacy Costs and get their cost structure back to a competitive basis. They were moving in this direction when they were caught in this government caused recession. Then the government forced the resignation of Rick Wagner who is responsible for the positive changes now happening at GM. GM has many great products in the pipeline. All of this was planned and put into operation before the Obama administration. GM can compete with anyone given a reasonable cost structure. Their engineers are second to none. The UAW and the Federal Government are at the heart of all their problems.

In summary. We will not have a UAW in the future. We can let the UAW kill off our automakers which will mean no UAW. Or we can get rid of UAW or neuter them to a large degree so that GM, Ford and Chrysler can possibly survive. We need to understand these option. You cannot support the wage structure of the US Auto Industry in this competitive world.
10 posted on 04/06/2010 3:10:09 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I have to wonder where they think that money is going to come from...scary to think that the one employment contract they’d consider binding (on taxpayers) would be between another union and the US Government.


11 posted on 04/06/2010 3:11:46 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Ahh....

Never let a crisis go to waste.

Pension Crisis, great opportunity not for TARP but PORKED

Pension Organization and Redistribution Krafted for Equitible Distribution.

We have been warned they are coming after our 401(k's) etc. this is the crisis in which they will really do it...

12 posted on 04/06/2010 3:14:01 PM PDT by taildragger (Palin/Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Excellent post.

Knowng good folk @ GM and those on the pension, I was originally for the bailout, then GM had way to much debt and I wanted a "traditional" bankruptcy to get rid of the legacy cost. Forgetabout...

The question is will that ever happen again given Obozo took bankruptcy and common law backwards some 800 years to before the English King got tired of land squabbles, (from what I learned in business law), right out the window.

God help us....

13 posted on 04/06/2010 3:19:18 PM PDT by taildragger (Palin/Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I dont care if the union scum loose everything!


14 posted on 04/06/2010 3:22:27 PM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I’m going to make a very disturbing prediction, based upon our current marxist government. Unless the government and unions are stopped, I predict that the only way the government will determine a solution to this pension mess that governments and unions have created for themselves (and by default for taxpayers), is to confiscate all individual 401K’s, IRA’s and Company funded retirement funds and throw it all into one big pot along with all the underfunded government and union cadillac pensions in exchange for a government determined monthly annuity payment, (think social insecurity), thereby spreading the government and union pension risk over all taxpayer retirees. And the government will use all the retirement funds confiscated from us to help continued funding of government treasury debt as it continues to grow as China and other external parties cease purchasing said future debt auctions. Taxpayers may have to go postal enmasse to stop this effort.


15 posted on 04/06/2010 3:23:32 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod
I dont care if the union scum loose everything!

Me either. They voted for it.

16 posted on 04/06/2010 3:30:22 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
GM can have all the products in the pipeline that it wants, but until its customer base has a reason to believe that they can BUY a new car, the pipeline is going to choke with a lot of prototypes that don't sell.

Right now the only market segment GM has is the government need to dark SUV's. The rest of the market is hunkered down, not buying much of anything.

Which makes the idea of GM AND Chrysler putting Billions into pension plans a pipdream. Ain't gonna happen in this environment. Especially when the people who run the government drive Japanese name plates and would not think of putting a domestic name plate in the driveway.

Maybe Obama/Geithner could make that a mandate; all government employees must drive GM's. That might solve the problem. You betcha.

17 posted on 04/06/2010 3:30:43 PM PDT by Bernard (One if by Land, Two if by Sea, Three if by Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Good thinkin'

What advice do you have for Grandpa / Gramma, Mom / Dad who retired after 30+ years of service in good faith?

"Sorry 70+ year old Mom and Dad, I understand you have serious age related health issues, but the autocompany jetsioned their Retirement / Legacy costs. And you are, after all, expendable."

Oh, you have wet & dry macular degeneration and you need injections into your eye that cost $2000 per treatment (monthly) to delay the onset of complete BLINDNESS but your health care is now vapor care? Well, maybe the church can help you.

So, Dad, you need a pacemaker? Well, them's the breaks.

By the way, what do you think of my new ride? Its a Toyota. I love what it does for me.

18 posted on 04/06/2010 4:17:06 PM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raygun
Sorry 70+ year old Mom and Dad, I understand you have serious age related health issues, but the autocompany jetsioned their Retirement / Legacy costs. And you are, after all, expendable

What I would tell them it that they got paid 50% more than other industrial workers doing the same type of work they did. And that's not counting the lavish pensions they got. No industrial workers have been more pampered. The guy who lives across the culdesac from me retired from GM in the early 1980's. He's been getting a pension longer than what he worked. Why should those of us taxpayers pay for this guys lavish retirement. I don't have a pension. I have 401K program and I'm responsible for my retirement. Those who worked at GM, Ford, or Chrysler got big time pay and many probably didn't save as much as they could have thinking their pension would cover it.

You cannot get blood out of a turnip. US automakers face vicious competition from foreign firms. Look around you on the highway. I live in CA and 2/3 of cars are NOT made in USA. Now what are you gonna do about that. If US Automakers want to stay in business they are gonna have to do something about their legacy costs. It's not a matter of choice. They will either go Chapter 7 or reduce their cost structure. Life is tough.
19 posted on 04/06/2010 5:57:17 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

Well I’m pretty sure, given the type of stand-up & principled guy you purport yourself to be, you are of the persuasion that charity begins at home. So whatever healthcare benefits your elderly parents may lose you cover. It wouldn’t matter if its stomach cancer or whatever. You’d be springing for the visiting nurse to provide the necessary home health care.

And if it comes down to forecolosure on their retirement home, you’d step in to either subsidize their payments or at the very least offer them your bedroom (and you & your wife would set up cots in the basement).


20 posted on 04/06/2010 11:44:13 PM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson