KY-Sen. 2010: Testing Influence of the Tea Party in Kentucky Race (Grayson for Big Government)

The New York Times ^ | 2010-04-11 | Kate Zernike

[Christian_Capitalist]

And in increasingly sharp ads, he (TREY GRAYSON) argues that Dr. Paul is downright dangerous when it comes to foreign policy.

---

And here we see Trey Grayson's brand new "Flaming Gay-boy Rainbow War Banner", just recently unfurled to rally the RINO troops in Kentucky.

"I am proud to support great grassroots candidates like Dr. Paul....
Because he’s a federalist and he wants the states to have more say --
and as we respect the 10th Amendment in our Constitution,
he wants the states to have more say in a lot of these issues." ~~ Governor Sarah Palin.

Rand Paul is endorsed by:

• Sarah Palin
• Steve Forbes
• Dick Armey
• Gun Owners of America
• Concerned Women for America

In addition, in recent polling, Rand Paul is beating Trey Grayson 42% to 27% amongst Kentucky Republicans, leading strongest amongst self-identified Conservatives, Regular Church-Attenders, Pro-Lifers, and Gun-Owners.

Former Bill Clinton supporter, Trey Grayson (here shown snuggling fondly with his political sugar-daddy), leads amongst only one category: "Republicans who don't own guns".

Thus, as this time, Rand Paul is leading amongst most Kentucky Republicans, only losing the "Please don't hurt me!" Defenseless Sheeple vote.

[onyx]

Please refrain from pinging me. Thanks.

[Christian_Capitalist]

I will freely reply to any post on a Rand Paul thread that I see fit.
If it hurts your feelings to have to face any arguments on a Rand Paul thread, then you needn't attack him.

Then you won't get any argument from me. Works for both of us.

[onyx]

I do not want your lengthy posts on my forum page.
It’s as simple as that. You have nothing to say that’s of interest to me.

[Christian_Capitalist]

I do not want your lengthy posts on my forum page. It’s as simple as that. You have nothing to say that’s of interest to me.

On threads about Rand Paul, I will respond to attacks on Rand Paul. It's as simple as that.
You can avoid seeing my posts altogether, by simply avoiding such threads altogether, if you like.

That's entirely up to you, sweetie-noogums.

[dcwusmc]

Then quit spamming these threads with your lies about the Paul family and no one will need to correct you.

[onyx]

Boo-Hoo. I already told you last night, that Ronald is suitable for ridicule only and that’s what he’ll get from me.

[Christian_Capitalist]

Boo-Hoo. I already told you last night, that Ronald is suitable for ridicule only and that’s what he’ll get from me.

Boo-Hoo. Then I expect you'll be seeing a lot from me.
Post on these threads, you'll get argument on these threads.

Enjoy it.

[onyx]

That sounds like a threat, troll.
Seek your attention elsewhere. Do not ping me to your nonsense.

[SoCalPol]

>Why is Paul hanging around with Adam Kokesh>

Because they are both anti war,and allied with Code Pinko

[SoCalPol]

Looks like the replies you receive are from the elementary school faction.

[Christian_Capitalist]

That sounds like a threat, troll.

Nothing of the sort. Entirely a promise.

Like I said: I will freely reply to any post on a Rand Paul thread that I see fit. If it hurts your feelings to have to face any arguments on a Rand Paul thread, then you needn't attack him.

Works for both of us.

Seek your attention elsewhere. Do not ping me to your nonsense.

On threads about Rand Paul, I will respond to attacks on Rand Paul. It's as simple as that. You can avoid seeing my posts altogether, by simply avoiding such threads altogether, if you like.

That's entirely up to you.

[onyx]

From the retread troll. Yes.
A few more outbursts from that one and I’ll consider filing a complaint.

[onyx]

Nothing you say “hurts my feelings,” troll.
I asked you, now I’m telling you, do not ping me to your rantings.
I have not pinged you to my posts and I am not interested in anything you have to say.

[Christian_Capitalist]

Nothing you say “hurts my feelings,” troll. I asked you, now I’m telling you, do not ping me to your rantings. I have not pinged you to my posts and I am not interested in anything you have to say.

Well, if you choose not to show up on threads attacking Rand Paul, then you'll face no argument about Rand Paul from me.

Like I said, that's entirely up to you.

[onyx]

Get lost, troll.
Are you Rand’s mother?
I note that you troll for arguments on every thread you’re on.

[ohioWfan]

OR, the footprint of a Ron Paul troll.

:)

[Christian_Capitalist]

To: Christian_Capitalist Get lost, troll. Are you Rand’s mother?

No, I'm his brother.
(Brother in Christ, that is; Rand and I are both Calvinist Presbyterians. Little bit of "inside baseball" for you there, free of charge.)

I note that you troll for arguments on every thread you’re on.

I do defend my brothers, yes.

And will continue to do so. If you don't like it, you needn't come around these threads. Entirely up to you.

[onyx]

[Christian_Capitalist]

The only "olive branch" you needed to offer was a retraction of the laughable accusation about my caring only about WAR. (still chuckling about it actually). ~~ Okay, I retract the accusation.

I even offered the very olive branch you requested -- and yet, apparently, it does no good?

I thought that you'd claimed to be honest, and a practitioner of Christian reconciliation.

Were you lying?