Skip to comments.KY-Sen. 2010: Testing Influence of the Tea Party in Kentucky Race (Grayson for Big Government)
Posted on 04/10/2010 11:05:25 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
Mr. Grayson argues that some of Dr. Pauls ideas (getting rid of the Departments of Energy, Education and Commerce) are too weird for Kentucky. And in increasingly sharp ads, he argues that Dr. Paul is downright dangerous when it comes to foreign policy.
Heres a guy who is outside of the Republican mainstream, Mr. Grayson said in an interview here.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Mr. Grayson, it's become apparent that you're just another Big Government RINO!
Of intrest to pualistinians maybe...not for your average bear...
besides being in favor of closing GITMO paul has been slumming with kokesh:
Peas in a pod person...birds of a plucked feather...
Or did you think people like me would forget shit like this:
“Midge Potts, a member of Code Pink, said veterans like Kokesh give the anti-war cause more credibility. Code Pink is an organization made up of women who oppose the Iraq War”
Birds of a feather...
Well Sarah Palin endorsed Rand Paul, so he must be a RINO just like McCain. /sarc
Heh...I dont care who she endorses...I got eyes and ears of my own...
Paul is more than happy to slum around with adam Kokesh....
And Kokesh is a flat out TRAITOR embraced by code pink...
Note the answer coaltion.org signs they are being arrested for...
Paul even sat in the same room with this clod and didnt kick his ass , he isnt fit to run for dog catcher.
Here’s paul and kokesh yucking it up...talking about OUR MOVEMENT:
Loons in populist clothing....anything Kokesh is involved in is bad news...
Bah arrest video link dropped...
Here it is:
plenty more moonbattery where that came from..
Ah...whole kokesh moonbat channel.
So you are a Paulie,might have known.
PAULTARD is the word, but you’re right.
And in increasingly sharp ads, he (TREY GRAYSON) argues that Dr. Paul is downright dangerous when it comes to foreign policy.
Oh it's going to sting for the Paul-haters when establishment McConnell-lapdog Charles Merwin "Trey" Grayson III goes down in flames on May 18th.
Grayson is a prime candidate for a mental institution.
Likely so, and the guy will be in the US Senate for 6 long years, but at least he’ll give the likes of Franken and other jokes and Marxists fits.
Beware of anybody named Grayson in politics.
Congress needs to look at every single part of the Federal Government and eliminate the non-Constitutional parts of it. The Department of Education is a great place to start. Eliminate the entire thing.
The Department of Agriculture, most of that can be eliminated. The National Forests fall under it's purview, they ought to be turned over to the States.
Energy includes our nuclear weapons programs, can't eliminate those, but most of the rest ought to be gone.
If Grayson thinks this is too wierd, he is now not in touch with the mood of Americans and being in office isn't going get him closer to the American people. Paul could do limited damage to foreign policy and may force the foreign policy to improve by hammering it.
So, what say Kentucky FReepers?
Why is paul hanging out with TRAITORS like adam kokesh?
How about you paul LOVERS explain why Paul is hanging out with traitors like Adam Kokesh...
Why is Paul hanging around with Adam Kokesh if he’s such a staunch conservative??
And here we see Trey Grayson's brand new "Flaming Gay-boy Rainbow War Banner", just recently unfurled to rally the RINO troops in Kentucky.
Rand Paul is endorsed by:
In addition, in recent polling, Rand Paul is beating Trey Grayson 42% to 27% amongst Kentucky Republicans, leading strongest amongst self-identified Conservatives, Regular Church-Attenders, Pro-Lifers, and Gun-Owners.
Former Bill Clinton supporter, Trey Grayson (here shown snuggling fondly with his political sugar-daddy), leads amongst only one category: "Republicans who don't own guns".
Thus, as this time, Rand Paul is leading amongst most Kentucky Republicans, only losing the "Please don't hurt me!" Defenseless Sheeple vote.
Please refrain from pinging me. Thanks.
Then you won't get any argument from me. Works for both of us.
I do not want your lengthy posts on my forum page.
It’s as simple as that. You have nothing to say that’s of interest to me.
On threads about Rand Paul, I will respond to attacks on Rand Paul. It's as simple as that.
You can avoid seeing my posts altogether, by simply avoiding such threads altogether, if you like.
That's entirely up to you, sweetie-noogums.
Then quit spamming these threads with your lies about the Paul family and no one will need to correct you.
Boo-Hoo. I already told you last night, that Ronald is suitable for ridicule only and that’s what he’ll get from me.
Boo-Hoo. Then I expect you'll be seeing a lot from me.
Post on these threads, you'll get argument on these threads.
That sounds like a threat, troll.
Seek your attention elsewhere. Do not ping me to your nonsense.
>Why is Paul hanging around with Adam Kokesh>
Because they are both anti war,and allied with Code Pinko
Looks like the replies you receive are from the elementary school faction.
Nothing of the sort. Entirely a promise.
Like I said: I will freely reply to any post on a Rand Paul thread that I see fit. If it hurts your feelings to have to face any arguments on a Rand Paul thread, then you needn't attack him.
Works for both of us.
Seek your attention elsewhere. Do not ping me to your nonsense.
On threads about Rand Paul, I will respond to attacks on Rand Paul. It's as simple as that. You can avoid seeing my posts altogether, by simply avoiding such threads altogether, if you like.
That's entirely up to you.
From the retread troll. Yes.
A few more outbursts from that one and I’ll consider filing a complaint.
Nothing you say “hurts my feelings,” troll.
I asked you, now I’m telling you, do not ping me to your rantings.
I have not pinged you to my posts and I am not interested in anything you have to say.
Well, if you choose not to show up on threads attacking Rand Paul, then you'll face no argument about Rand Paul from me.
Like I said, that's entirely up to you.
Get lost, troll.
Are you Rand’s mother?
I note that you troll for arguments on every thread you’re on.
OR, the footprint of a Ron Paul troll.
No, I'm his brother.
(Brother in Christ, that is; Rand and I are both Calvinist Presbyterians. Little bit of "inside baseball" for you there, free of charge.)
I note that you troll for arguments on every thread youre on.
I do defend my brothers, yes.
And will continue to do so. If you don't like it, you needn't come around these threads. Entirely up to you.
I even offered the very olive branch you requested -- and yet, apparently, it does no good?
I thought that you'd claimed to be honest, and a practitioner of Christian reconciliation.
Were you lying?
PAULTARD troll and a sensitive, nasty one at that.
A little birdie told me, it's considered polite to "ping" folks when you talk about them on the thread.
Feel free to ping me whenever you feel the burning need to discuss my compelling and apparently-irresistible personalty.
(I have no such interest in discussing yours; but, your personality is of no interest to me).
That made your ad hominem (and stupid) accusation (and subsequent 'retraction') less important than your clear trolling on multiple threads.
Sorry. My first impression was right on target. You're not what you claim to be.
I am being completely honest, as always. Perhaps someday you will be honest and let us all know what you're really up to and who you really are.
Or maybe that would get you banned, eh?
More signs of being a retread.
In the case of the PaulBots, foot print of a Chicken sh***er
Not the way I’d put it, but no argument from me. :)
LOL. On point!
Some things never change!
Remains true in 2010.