KY-Sen. 2010: Testing Influence of the Tea Party in Kentucky Race (Grayson for Big Government)

The New York Times ^ | 2010-04-11 | Kate Zernike

[onyx]

Yes, ohioWfan.
PAULTARD troll and a sensitive, nasty one at that.

[Christian_Capitalist]

Yes, ohioWfan. PAULTARD troll and a sensitive, nasty one at that.

A little birdie told me, it's considered polite to "ping" folks when you talk about them on the thread.

Feel free to ping me whenever you feel the burning need to discuss my compelling and apparently-irresistible personalty.

(I have no such interest in discussing yours; but, your personality is of no interest to me).

[ohioWfan]

No - not lying (I don't lie). I just saw you trolling on at least three threads at the same time.

That made your ad hominem (and stupid) accusation (and subsequent 'retraction') less important than your clear trolling on multiple threads.

Sorry. My first impression was right on target. You're not what you claim to be.

I am being completely honest, as always. Perhaps someday you will be honest and let us all know what you're really up to and who you really are.

Or maybe that would get you banned, eh?

[ohioWfan]

More signs of being a retread.

[SoCalPol]

In the case of the PaulBots, foot print of a Chicken sh***er

[ohioWfan]

Not the way I’d put it, but no argument from me. :)

[SoCalPol]

[onyx]

LOL. On point!

[ohioWfan]

Oooo..........that’s brutal!

[onyx]

ROTFLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.
Some things never change!
Remains true in 2010.

[Christian_Capitalist]

No - not lying (I don't lie). I just saw you trolling on at least three threads at the same time. That made your ad hominem (and stupid) accusation (and subsequent 'retraction') less important than your clear trolling on multiple threads.

Okay, so you did lie. You asked for a retraction, said that was all I needed to offer, I did so, and then you decided that wasn't enough.

Which means, you lied. Pretty simple, really, I get it.

Sorry. My first impression was right on target. You're not what you claim to be. I am being completely honest, as always. Perhaps someday you will be honest and let us all know what you're really up to and who you really are. Or maybe that would get you banned, eh?

I've posted my own regionally-syndicated Tea Party Radio spots online for your perusal and enjoyment. Who else has been that open, without giving you my freepin' Social Security number? You've posted NONE of your own "Conservative credentials". (I suspect that you have none).

You won't even, on the thread upon which I inquired of you, answer my question about Adam Kokesh's opponent, Tom Mullins, will you?

So much for being "completely honest".

[onyx]

[Christian_Capitalist]

One of the first Free Republic threads I was posting on, I was arguing with Randall Terry (the founder of Operation Rescue). FReeper Anti-Bubba182 told me "If you want to talk to somebody here put their posting name in the box below the label, "To: (use semi-colons to separate multiple recipients)" on the Post Reply page when you make the post."

Was he correct, or was I misinformed?

[ohioWfan]

I think your lying 'informant' is actually you.

I haven't lied. I've seen you in action, and realized that any 'retraction' would be disingenous because you are developing a clear record as a troll and a profound liar yourself.

And, because you are a troll, and I am a legitimate conservative freeper (who has given you more information than required to a troll), I have decided not to feed you any more.

See ya.

[SoCalPol]

What a maroon!

[onyx]

His shoes crack me up! LOL.

[Christian_Capitalist]

I think your lying 'informant' is actually you. I haven't lied. I've seen you in action, and realized that any 'retraction' would be disingenous because you are developing a clear record as a troll and a profound liar yourself. And, because you are a troll, and I am a legitimate conservative freeper (who has given you more information than required to a troll), I have decided not to feed you any more. See ya.

Whenever I post a question to an opponent which they are unable or unwilling to answer, I know I've won the debate.

See ya.

[ohioWfan]

An opponent on which website? (that you just denied being part of after I asked where you came from).

Sooner or later lies always catch up with you, troll.

The truth will set you free.

[Christian_Capitalist]

An opponent on which website?

This one. www.freerepublic.com.

You know, the website on which you refuse to answer my question about Adam Kokesh's primary opponent, Tom Mullins?

Whenever I post a question to an opponent which they are unable or unwilling to answer, I know I've won the debate.

See ya.

[ohioWfan]

It's nice to know that you've "won" this debate in your own mind.

Tells me even more about you. :)