Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SoCal Experiencing Surge in Earthquake Activity
KTLA News ^ | April 13, 2010 | KTLA News

Posted on 04/13/2010 7:10:57 PM PDT by bd476


KTLA News

SoCal Experiencing Surge in Earthquake Activity

70 quakes greater than a magnitude 4.0 have struck the region this year -- more than any year in the past decade.

KTLA News
11:08 AM PDT, April 13, 2010

LOS ANGELES -- Southern California, along with Baja California, has seen a surge in moderate earthquake activity this year and scientists are trying to figure out what's causing the uptick.

There have been 70 quakes greater than a magnitude 4.0 so far this year. That's the most of any year in the last decade -- and, it's only April. There were 30 in 2009 and 29 in 2008.

Seismologists say they are looking into the recent surge but they can not yet fully explain it.

The string of earthquakes could mean that Southern California might again be entering a more active seismic period, and more significant quakes could be on the way, according to experts.

Scientists also said the increase does not mean the Big One is more likely to hit.

Egill Hauksson, a geophysicist at Caltech, told The Los Angeles Times that the rate of quakes in the region is "probably . . . picking up again" after a relative lull that lasted more than a decade.

"What it means is that we are going to have more earthquakes than in the average year. With more earthquakes, we're bound to have more bigger ones. But there are always fewer of those than the smaller ones."

Caltech seismologist Kate Hutton said experts would like to be able to explain the surge, but "there's no real correlation with any cause."

Many of the quakes this year have been aftershocks to the 7.2 magnitude temblor that struck the Mexicali area, killing two people. The border had previously experienced a swarm of earthquakes.

Scientists say one of their biggest concerns remains the San Andreas fault, which has produced some of the state's largest earthquakes and is said to be overdue for a major event.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: earthquake; losangeles; orangecounty; riverside; sanandreas; sanbernardino; sandiego; socal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Excerpted article from Los Angeles Times

More moving and shaking, but why?

By Cara Mia DiMassa
April 12, 2010

< Snip >

...
The number of earthquakes greater than magnitude 4.0 in Southern California and Baja California has increased significantly in 2010. There have been 70 such quakes so far this year, the most of any year in the last decade. And it's only April. There were 30 in 2009 and 29 in 2008.

< Snip >

...
The public's awareness of quakes around the globe also has increased with technology. Individuals on Twitter, for example, often first hear about a major quake from fellow users.

And the details of earthquakes, including location and size, have been much better distributed through e-mail, blogs and Twitter feeds. Earthquakes in remote oceans, say, were once noted only by scientists at academic and government institutions. Now, quake enthusiasts can have the details of such a quake delivered to their cellphones minutes after it occurs.

In California, scientists say one of their biggest concerns remains the San Andreas fault, which has produced some of the state's largest earthquakes. Experts have said the San Andreas is overdue for a major event. State officials have also often noted that only about one in six Californians has , with the high cost and large deductibles deterring many homeowners from buying policies.

"As we are building along the San Andreas fault, our exposure to the shaking hazard increases," said Mark Benthien, director of communication, education and outreach for the Southern California Earthquake Center. "And the losses we get in earthquakes increase as well. That's part of the equation."

Hauksson, the Caltech geophysicist, said it's easy to read too much into the upsurge of quakes this year.

Though it comes after several more quiet years, he noted that it's not uncommon for one large quake to produce months -- if not years -- of increased seismic activity. So in that sense, 2010's quake pattern is fairly typical...

End of excerpted article

Read the entire article here: More moving and shaking, but why?


1 posted on 04/13/2010 7:10:57 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: navysealdad; Ernest_at_the_Beach; calljack; lainie; BurbankKarl; pollywog; Brad's Gramma; ...

Earthquake Ping List. If you would like to have your name added to this list or removed from it, please FReepmail me.

2 posted on 04/13/2010 7:13:41 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476

I am still hoping for it to sink into the Pacific


3 posted on 04/13/2010 7:14:30 PM PDT by GeronL (Entitlement Zombies will become real zombies when the money runs out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Its all the illegal aliens coming in we are going to capsize into the ocean


4 posted on 04/13/2010 7:15:06 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Yikes...ANOTHER one?

Could this possibly be looked at in a positive light, meaning that the chances of having the BIG ONE occur has decreased?


5 posted on 04/13/2010 7:15:16 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

Some scientists believe that—the little shifts relieve enough pressure to prevent a big one.

And let’s not forget there are a lot of conservatives & military in CA.


6 posted on 04/13/2010 7:16:52 PM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bd476

It’s not just here but apparently the whole Pacific rim. I cannot recall this many 7.x earthquakes around the Pacific in such a short period of time.


7 posted on 04/13/2010 7:16:58 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476
Ought to have the big one linked in here:

6.9 Earthquake in Baja . . . felt in S. California (Updated to 7.2)

I thought that was downgraded to 6.9?

Hmmmm...

8 posted on 04/13/2010 7:17:49 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bd476
it's easy to read too much into the upsurge of quakes this year

Reasonable and knowledgeable observers can suppose that the activity makes it more likely that a big quake will occur and others will propose that the rash of quakes eases pressure on the faults. Time will tell.

9 posted on 04/13/2010 7:18:19 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476

I’m watching the movie 2012....again right now.

I’m in Alaska, former Kalifornia refugee.

To be frankly honest, I would move to firmer ground, like Utah?


10 posted on 04/13/2010 7:21:47 PM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bd476
More moving and shaking, but why?
It's all Big Maybelle's fault.
11 posted on 04/13/2010 7:24:04 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Maybelle Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
guress it is now at 7.2.....

Sunday, April 04, 2010 at 22:40:42 UTC 7.2

Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) (poorly constrained)

Distances * 17 km (11 miles) WSW (258°) from Guadalupe Victoria, Baja California, Mexico

12 posted on 04/13/2010 7:24:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

13 posted on 04/13/2010 7:25:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bd476

When “the big one” hits So-Cal, you won’t find out through Twitter because the net will be down.


14 posted on 04/13/2010 7:26:39 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

That would put you closer to the Yellowstone super volcanoe...


15 posted on 04/13/2010 7:26:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR
ChrisInAR wrote: "Yikes...ANOTHER one? Could this possibly be looked at in a positive light, meaning that the chances of having the BIG ONE occur has decreased?"

They do not know what the increase in EQs over 4.0 indicates but they are hard at work trying to figure out what it means.

They do know that earthquakes occur in cycles, with some low activity periods occurring. Southern California is coming out of a low activity cycle.

Despite researching earthquakes for decades, the best information from geophysicists at this time is that no one knows or can predict with certainty whether an increase in the number of over 4.0 magnitude quakes foretells an imminent very large magnitude earthquake until after the very large magnitude quake has occurred.

The best plan is to always be prepared.


16 posted on 04/13/2010 7:28:17 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; TankerKC
Ernest_at_the_Beach wrote: " Ought to have the big one linked in here:

6.9 Earthquake in Baja . . . felt in S. California (Updated to 7.2) "


Thank you, Ernest!


17 posted on 04/13/2010 7:31:55 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bd476
If the evidence shows that the frequency of EQ's occur in cycles, what about their depth...or is the depth completely random?
18 posted on 04/13/2010 7:32:40 PM PDT by ChrisInAR (Alright, tighten your shorts, Pilgrim, & sing like the Duke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk; bd476; Willie Green
Good discussion on this thread...about the earth and what is going on.

One more thing to worry about – undersea supervolcanoes

See #20 and #39 and the links there....

Plate tectonics was the old hypothesis about what the earth was doing...now there are competing theories known as the expanding earth and Surge Tectonics.

19 posted on 04/13/2010 7:33:15 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just felt shaking here in the Fallbrook area North of San Diego...A Shake and rolling motion....


20 posted on 04/13/2010 7:36:41 PM PDT by TaraP (He never offered our victories without fighting but he said help would always come in time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I’m really sick of you people and your sink into the Pacific crap. There’s one “H” of a lot of good Conservatives, one “H” of a lot of good Americans here in California, as well it’s the home of Free Republic.

Hopefully you have contributed to the cause of FReedom as we here at the ranch have, and have sent something to keep FR alive and well.


21 posted on 04/13/2010 7:37:54 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

22 posted on 04/13/2010 7:38:13 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: al baby

23 posted on 04/13/2010 7:38:39 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Well, I still have family and friends there, so I think your comment is rude.


24 posted on 04/13/2010 7:40:12 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

They have shakes, too.


25 posted on 04/13/2010 7:40:44 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Parley Baer wrote: "It's not just here but apparently the whole Pacific rim. I cannot recall this many 7.x earthquakes around the Pacific in such a short period of time."

True, there have been many, but again, earthquakes appear to occur in cycles.

26 posted on 04/13/2010 7:41:33 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bd476

27 posted on 04/13/2010 7:42:14 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
True and you summed it up nicely. :)

28 posted on 04/13/2010 7:43:42 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Yikes. More than 2800 in the past week. Usually it’s somewhere between 250 and 400 a week.


29 posted on 04/13/2010 7:44:33 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I am still hoping for it to sink into the Pacific

No can do.

The continent is thicker than the ocean is deep.

Best we can hope for is it splits away from the rest of North America...

30 posted on 04/13/2010 7:47:14 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 446 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bd476
It seems like there's been an uptick in earthquakes globally in the past few decades.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
[...and still counting until 2014]

"this trend needs to be understood in relation to the increase in seismographs. Certainly, in the last 25 years, more lower intensity earthquakes have been noticed because of a general increase in the number of seismograph stations across the world and improved global communications. This increase has helped seismological centres to locate many small earthquakes which were undetected in earlier decades. Therefore, an upward trend is not unexpected in the graph, although the rise in the number of large earthquakes will be of more significance to our assessment of the trend.

By limiting the range of earthquakes being counted in this report to magnitude 7 or above, it means these earthquakes can easily be identified by a limited number of seismographs, and we have ensured that any increase in frequency for these larger earthquakes cannot be down to the increase in overall detection rates in this 25-year period, as all these larger earthquakes are able to be easily detected with fewer seismograph stations."

http://earth.webecs.co.uk/index.htm

31 posted on 04/13/2010 7:47:44 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Eye of Unk wrote: "I'm watching the movie 2012....again right now. I'm in Alaska, former Kalifornia refugee."

Alaska? Alaska ??

Here, this says it best regarding your move to the home of extremely large earthquakes:



Eye of Unk wrote: "To be frankly honest, I would move to firmer ground, like Utah?"

Agree. That's an excellent idea.


32 posted on 04/13/2010 7:53:36 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn

Why would anyone take that comment seriously? Seriously, I don’t even think its possible.


33 posted on 04/13/2010 7:55:19 PM PDT by GeronL (Entitlement Zombies will become real zombies when the money runs out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

A rolling motion is suppose to mean that you are some distance from it....heard that the other day.


34 posted on 04/13/2010 7:56:07 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Because it wasn’t funny... I guess you had to grow up in Earthquake country to understand why it’s not funny.


35 posted on 04/13/2010 7:58:12 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bd476

Yes Alaska has many times more quakes than California, I think its of an order of 100 times as much.

And thats good, all the pressure is let off on a daily basis, we don’t have big ones very often, nothing compared to SF, LA and such.

Yeah we one in 1964, nothing much since then. I felt a 4.6 last week, most are 3.0 and smaller, we ignore them and I really don’t notice them.


36 posted on 04/13/2010 7:59:56 PM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I am still hoping for it to sink into the Pacific.

Didn't some democrat say recently something about an island somewhere capsizing and sinking? He actually thought islands "float" on the water.

37 posted on 04/13/2010 8:00:22 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ETL

lol. Yes, that was really stupid. Islands are really the backs of giant turtles, everyone knows that. /s


38 posted on 04/13/2010 8:03:18 PM PDT by GeronL (Entitlement Zombies will become real zombies when the money runs out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bd476
and scientists are trying to figure out what's causing the uptick.

Hmmm..... maybe the Earth's crust is shifting?

39 posted on 04/13/2010 8:11:30 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Were are taking Free Republic with us if we go!


40 posted on 04/13/2010 8:16:48 PM PDT by ThomasThomas (Sometimes I like nuts. That's why I am here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
LOL! Thanks Willie.

41 posted on 04/13/2010 8:22:03 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Thanks Libloather.

42 posted on 04/13/2010 8:22:34 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Thanks for the link and reference material, ETL. :)

43 posted on 04/13/2010 8:23:21 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

Fresno is on the North American Plate. The server farm is here in Silicon Valley, east of the San Andreas, west of the Hayward. Too close to call...


44 posted on 04/13/2010 8:24:01 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 446 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Its all the illegal aliens coming in we are going to capsize into the ocean.

Heading northbound? Lean right! LEAN RIGHT!

45 posted on 04/13/2010 8:30:10 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
There is also the thought that an earthquake actually increases the amount of stress on a fault.

46 posted on 04/13/2010 8:34:11 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: All

Now, just breaking, China:
http://www.foxnews.com/


47 posted on 04/13/2010 8:34:37 PM PDT by elpinta (Jer. 10:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
I’m really sick of you people and your sink into the Pacific crap. There’s one “H” of a lot of good Conservatives, one “H” of a lot of good Americans here in California, as well it’s the home of Free Republic.

I agree. Not only does the whole "sink into the Pacific" crap show an utter ignorance of geology, but they don't seem to realize that there are more NRA members (and thus conservatives) in California than any other state. Not to mention it isn't all palm trees and beaches here. We have the highest mountains outside of Alaska here.

48 posted on 04/13/2010 8:37:19 PM PDT by Inyo-Mono (Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Hey, I am hoping for beach front property here in Phoenix.


49 posted on 04/13/2010 8:38:43 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bd476; Strategerist; winoneforthegipper; Steve Van Doorn

IMPOSSIBLE.

Strategerist did not authorize THAT!


50 posted on 04/13/2010 8:45:45 PM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson