Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tehran: If Iran Is Attacked, Nuclear Devices Will Go Off In American Cities
DEBKA ^ | April 13, 2010 | Special Report

Posted on 04/15/2010 1:58:59 AM PDT by Fennie

This warning, along with an announcement that Iran would join the world's nuclear club within a month, raised the pitch of Iranian anti-US rhetoric to a new high Tuesday, April 13, as 47 world leaders gathered in Washington for President Barack Obama's Nuclear Security Summit.

The statement published by Kayhan said: "If the US strikes Iran with nuclear weapons, there are elements which will respond with nuclear blasts in the centers of America's main cities."

For the first time, DEBKAfile's military sources report, Tehran indicated the possibility of passing nuclear devices to terrorists capable of striking inside the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at debka.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: debka; iran; islam; israel; jihad; military; nuclear; nuclearattack; obama; palin; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

1 posted on 04/15/2010 1:58:59 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

DEBKA. Take it with a huge grain of salt.


2 posted on 04/15/2010 2:01:09 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Why? Whats so wrong with Debka?


3 posted on 04/15/2010 2:08:59 AM PDT by Jeb21 (www.jewsagainstobama.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Indeed.

I do remember however, hearing about pre-placed caches of weapons, munitions and communications equipment in Western countries that’d been placed by the Soviets. Has any information come to light of exactly what was in them? I think that the Swiss disarmed one of them after it’d been identified by Mitrokhin.


4 posted on 04/15/2010 2:09:52 AM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Yeah, yeah, yeah..we already have a weapon of mass destruction sitting in the oval office. Far scarier than any nuke.


5 posted on 04/15/2010 2:11:36 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite
DEBKA. Take it with a huge grain of salt.

Ahmadinejad. Take it with a huge grain of salt.

6 posted on 04/15/2010 2:15:39 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I’ll take plenty of salt with that but the phrase is unclear as to whether the suitcases are potential or already in place.


7 posted on 04/15/2010 2:35:04 AM PDT by wiggen (Government owned slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I wonder if Obammy asked the russian delgation attending the summit “ Tell me the whereabouts of the 27 missing 1970’s era suitcase nukes missing from your arsenal”


8 posted on 04/15/2010 2:41:14 AM PDT by Artie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Debka lol.

9 posted on 04/15/2010 2:50:58 AM PDT by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

I do have a certain skepticism when it comes to any such report.

However, I distinctly remember a Debka piece before the campaign in Iraq started; it reported many convoys of large trucks moving from Iraq into Syria. Probably Hussein’s stocks of chem/bio.


10 posted on 04/15/2010 3:04:44 AM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in democrat stands for patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie; Alamo-Girl; Amityschild; AngieGal; AnimalLover; Ann de IL; annieokie; aragorn; auggy; ...

Tooooo many people have contributed puzzle pieces to that effect, imho.

So much smoke . . .

Besides, with so much Saudi money

So much deliberate porosity of the borders . . .

it’s almost like the globalists have insured that there are nukes held by terrorists in our cities.

I’d think—given all the givens—that it would be highly unlikely for that NOT to be the case.


11 posted on 04/15/2010 3:26:15 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

If terrorists had nukes in our cities they would have set them off by now.


12 posted on 04/15/2010 3:30:07 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
For the first time, DEBKAfile's military sources report, Tehran indicated the possibility of passing nuclear devices to terrorists capable of striking inside the United States. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Why are people acting so effoing surprised. The Iranian rag heads will be doing a lot worse when they get the nuclear bomb. No one will be safe from them until they are erradicated. Yes, the let has manipulated things so that we have waited too long.

Now the lefft must own its folly.

Obama is talking "sanctions" when there should be a dozen glowing deep pit holes just outside Tehran.The conditions for WW III are being created as we speak.

13 posted on 04/15/2010 3:55:11 AM PDT by Candor7 (Now's the time to ante up against the Obama Fascist Junta ( member NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
Although Iran has yet to attain operational nuclear arms, our military sources believe it does possess the makings of primitive nuclear devices or "dirty bombs." Dirty bombs are NOTHING compared to actual nukes.
14 posted on 04/15/2010 3:58:38 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

I’ve always found that a silly assumption.

Not all terrorists are psychotic, irrational, impulsive.

Many are disciplined stooges of the globalist oligarchy and do not take a step except as ordered.

If YOU were running the globalist oligarchy and had insured that terrorists had nukes in USA cities, would YOU have allowed the terrorists involved to have been anything other than strictly disciplined and submissive to your orders?


15 posted on 04/15/2010 3:58:59 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Not to worry,, Jack Bauer will be on the case.


16 posted on 04/15/2010 3:59:58 AM PDT by joelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotsman will be Free

Read the quotes ref’d in my tagline.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81

They can’t control every detail . . . and things are super complex and evolving.

Nevertheless, the whole show has been meticulously choreographed for at least 110 years.

Dramatic festivities are looming on the near horizon.

Thankfully SOME FREEPERS have awakened to the realities invovled.

SOME seem to still be cluelessly believing the Main Stream Media about life and realities.


17 posted on 04/15/2010 4:01:07 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fennie
I hope they put the first few in San Francisco, Chicago, Hollywood, and Cambridge, MA.

Maybe Ithaca NY, Portland, OR, and Detroit as well. /sarc>

But leave Minneapolis / St. Paul alone. We elected Bachmann.

Cheers!

18 posted on 04/15/2010 4:01:42 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.http://www.free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

“Dirty bombs are NOTHING compared to actual nukes.”

Whether it be a plane flying into a building or a dirty bomb, terror is what it is. It doesn’t necessarily have to flatten a city


19 posted on 04/15/2010 4:03:22 AM PDT by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Quix

"Now take you weapon of mass destruction and get the F*** out of HERE!"

Cheers!

20 posted on 04/15/2010 4:03:44 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.http://www.free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson