Skip to comments.A DISASTER WITHOUT PRECEDENT
Posted on 04/30/2010 10:22:46 PM PDT by Cedar
Federal and state officials pushed oil giant BP to intensify its efforts to cap a leaking oil well in the Gulf of Mexico and to contain the slick that is threatening the shores and livelihoods of people in five states.
As crude oil began to come ashore in Louisiana, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar met with the company's top executives and engineers and urged them to "work harder and faster and smarter to get the job done," he said.
"We cannot rest and we will not rest until BP permanently seals the wellhead and until they clean up every drop of oil," Salazar said.
Heavy winds and high tides impeded efforts to contain the growing slick on Friday, and oil continued to gush from the damaged exploration well, sending pungent odors through neighborhoods near New Orleans. Governors from the region expressed frustration at the company's inability to get the situation under control.
The widening crisis began April 20, when Deepwater Horizon, a drilling rig owned by Transocean and leased by BP, caught fire and sank, killing 11 people. Ten days later, coastal residents, state officials and environmental groups began to question whether the oil industry and Interior Department regulators had done enough to prepare for such a catastrophic accident.
Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen said in an interview Friday that the company's plans for responding to oil spills did not address the complete failure of equipment on the sea floor designed to prevent a blowout of the sort that took place on the massive drilling rig.
"We're breaking new ground here. It's hard to write a plan for a catastrophic event that has no precedent, which is what this was," Allen said, defending the company against not writing a response for "what could never be in a plan, what you couldn't anticipate."
Hammond Eve, who did environmental impact studies of offshore drilling for the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service (MMS), said the federal agency never planned for response to an oil spill of this size. "We never imagined that it would happen because the safety measures were supposed to work and prevent it from happening," he said.
He added that MMS began from the "premise that if something like this happened that it would be shut down fairly soon and a discrete amount of oil would be released and these clean-up measures would begin and you would never end up with a situation like this."
Eve, who lives on the water 20 miles east of New Orleans, said strong oil fumes were engulfing his neighborhood. "You can't breathe the air comfortably," he said. "It bites you right in the back of the throat and your eyeballs burn."
Obama administration officials fanned out across the Gulf of Mexico states pledging attention and assistance. In an already troubled economy, the oil slick threatened to damage the region's fishing and tourism industries as well as disrupt shipping along the Mississippi River.
On Friday, Louisiana's departments of Health and Hospitals and Wildlife and Fisheries announced severe restrictions on fishing and oyster harvesting east of the Mississippi River.
"I do have concerns that BP's current resources are not adequate to meet the challenges that we face," Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said at a news conference in New Orleans. "I've urged them to seek even more help from the federal government and from others."
In Washington, President Barack Obama said that "BP is ultimately responsible under the law for paying the costs of response and cleanup operations, but we are fully prepared to meet our responsibilities to any and all affected communities."
He said there were now five staging areas to protect sensitive shorelines and approximately 1,900 federal response personnel and more than 300 vessels and aircraft on the scene.
"We've also laid approximately 217,000 feet of protective boom, and there are more on the way," Obama said.
"It's a two-front war," said the Coast Guard's Allen. "The center of this whole thing is the leakage on the bottom," he said, adding that the priority is capping the leak. "If we don't do that we are going to be fighting an endless oil spill on the top."
The oil spill has buffeted BP, whose stock price has plunged more than 13 percent this week, wiping out about $20 billion of market value.
"We are doing absolutely everything in our power to eliminate the source of the leak and contain the environmental impact of the spill," BP chief executive Tony Hayward said in a statement.
"We are determined to fight this spill on all fronts, in the deep waters of the Gulf, in the shallow waters and, should it be necessary, on the shore."
He said the company welcomed offers of assistance from government agencies, other oil companies and even members of the public.
An official at the Organized Seafood Association of Alabama said his group would meet on Saturday with BP representatives about possible compensation for lost fishing income.
But some people said the company, in addition to bearing financial responsibility under a 1990 law, also bore responsibility for being too optimistic in its planning.
In the exploration plan that BP Exploration and Production Inc. submitted to the MMS for the Mississippi Canyon Block 252 lease on Feb. 23, 2009, the company expressed confidence it could handle a spill even larger than the one caused by the explosion at Deepwater Horizon.
It said the company "has the capability to respond to the appropriate worst-case spill scenario," which it defines in a chart as a "volume uncontrolled blowout" of 300,000 gallons a day.
On April 6, 2009 MMS approved the drilling with a warning: "Exercise caution while drilling due to indications of shallow gas and possible water flow."
MMS officials said they could not comment on the Deepwater Horizon incident, but added that the agency was reassessing the way it judges companies' abilities to cope with spills.
The cause of the well explosion remains uncertain.
Oil industry experts say that in deep-water wells such as this one, which was drilled in water 5,000 feet deep, high pressure increases the risks of a blowout.
BP has pointed a finger at Transocean, which owned and operated the rig.
Transocean has pointed at a company called Cameron, which made a key valve in the malfunctioning blowout preventer.
John Amos, who spent 10 years as a consulting exploration geologist for oil and gas companies and now heads SkyTruth, an operation that uses government satellite imagery to monitor environmental disasters, said he was not surprised that both oil executives and federal officials failed to properly forecast the risks associated with offshore drilling.
"Just like the explosion of a volcano, to a geologist like myself, these kinds of incidents are fairly predictable, but when they happen, they come as a shock to us," Amos said.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., whose panel has already sent letters to BP America, Transocean and oil services giant Halliburton inquiring into the cause of the explosion and the companies' inability to staunch the flow of oil, said he hoped to get more answers when officials from the three companies testified before his committee on May 12.
Halliburton was in charge of cementing for Deepwater Horizon -- plugging holes in the pipeline seal by pumping cement into it from the rig.
"The companies have the obligation, it seems to me, to have a plan, to anticipate and do what they could to prevent this sort of thing from happening," Waxman said in an interview. "They obviously didn't anticipate this."
Staff writer Juliet Eilperin contributed to this article
Who says the accident took place way down deep, first?
This “platform” is a ship with multiple azipod engines litterally keeping it hovering over the drill site, 5,000’ down.
Torpedo the ship, explode it,turtle it and sink it.
What happens to all that 5,000’ of drill pipe etc? Could bust a hundred ways.
That's what makes me curious. Airline crash, volcano eruption, tsunami, you name the disaster and the airwaves and bandwidth are overrun with experts. Not this time. I hate it when circumstances start encouraging thoughts of conspiracy and sabotage. I have never heard what caused the fire that started all this.
I also find it very strange that we've not heard, to the best of my knowledge, from a single survivor of the event. I would expect all sorts of written and broadcast interviews of those who were on board. Not a word. No stories of where they were on the rig, what they were doing, how they learned of the event, nothing.
Seems to me if you have what it takes to get a totally unprepared and unqualified person elected to the office of the POTUS, then it shouldn't be out of your league to cause a massive oil drilling event.
That is exactly right.
Anytime something big occurrs, the media are like piranah. non-stop 24/7, expert after expert, and when they run out of those, they start interviewing themselves.
NONE OF THIS IS OCCURRING.
This vaccuum is quite telling.
Something HUGE is being hidden, and that is all there is to it.
The scheduled test had just been done and approved by the toughest inspection process in any industry including the nuclear. The well was being reopened and the gass blast came as an over pressure sudden surge. This was a freak accident, not sabotage. This sort of accident is why the process is inherently dangerous dealing with such pressures as 40,000 pounds per square inch!
I do not have all the details. Was it a fixed or tethered latform or was it a drilling ship/platform?
Was it drilling or a producing well?
I thought it was a producing well. You could have had a scuba crew attach explosives.
I think the actual drilling ship/platforms have an even better safety record.
Something is not adding up.
Mark Levin spoke on the radio today with a survivor who confirmed it was a gas blowout.
I’m posting the link here to Mark Levin’s interview with the survivor. Interesting so far, though pretty technical.
Check the Mark Levin archive for today, end of the second hour and start of the third hour. An eyewitness spoke with Mark on-air ... ‘James’.
Now consider this bit of info:
Dan Riehl brought to light an interesting piece of trivia related to the offshore drilling rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. It appears the blame for this event, one of historys worst environmental disasters, cant be shuffled off to President George W. Bush.
Thats right! It seems the initial exploration plan for the British Petroleum-owned Macondo prospect was, according to the folks at OffshoreTechnology.com, approved by the folks at the Minerals Management Service in March 2009. MMS falls under the supervision of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and, by working your way up the federal food chain, the approval authority lands squarely on the desk of President Barack Obama.
Whoops Salazar and Obammy Ok'd this project! NOT BUSH"S FAULT!
The template of the story changed to the leaking oil not what happened. The govt controlled media switches track to the template the govt wants.
You are right. Figure out their agenda by what they are not saying.
From what I can piece together it was a drilling ship that says at a fixed position by computer and GPS control over the well.
Someone said it is a once in a lifetime possible gas pocket blow out. So the gas could have race up the piping and the ship caught fire and sank?
I know a little about the technology and these guys are really good. The amazing and incredible is common for them. They drill these wells worldwide. The technolgy for this advanced deep drilling ships is probably a decade old. Thousands of wells like this drilled nd it has never happened before?
I do not buy it.
People talk about “high tech” but the oil drilling industry is probably one of the most high tech industries in the world. They rarely if ever make mistakes.
I just finished reading the following FR post — Louisiana Spill: Big Oil’s Chernobyl. Somewhere in all of that, probably in a comment was something about the maker of the valve, also makers of other components.
But the timing of the explosion was certainly perfect.
Still posting drug-induced nothings from your grandma’s basement, I see.
Nor do I, Frantzie.
From the stories I heard today, most especially the haliburton employee who called savage, it does not seem like an explosion of this magnitude could occur based on a number of factors.
Although this man sounded very knowledgable, I cannot verify anything he said, because I have no knowledge of these things.
However, what I do have knowledge of is american media, because i read and view it all the time. The fact that no one like this man has been interviewed... heck, they haven’t even interviewed people that would confirm that it was caused naturally.
SILENCE is all there is, except for reports on the spreading oil.
The Mark Levin interview is very good. The guy basically ends up saying the accident was due to “mother nature” or possible negligence, though he obviously leans towards the mother nature explanation.
I agree the silence is very strange. Every other type of accident has experts and survivors appearing on TV all day long, but not this one.
And why would this rig worker’s identity have to be a secret?
That is unreal. To put it in perspective, a 12 gauge shotgun load is limited to about 11,500 psi, and that for just a fraction of a second.
Just read the FR post you mentioned— some very good information posted there by those who seem to know the industry.
A DISASTER WITHOUT PRECEDENT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.