Skip to comments.Holographic Sights for SOCOM M4s
Posted on 05/31/2010 6:05:01 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
-3 Communications subsidiary EOTech, Inc. in Ann Arbor, MI received a $25 million sole-source, firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/ indefinite-quantity contract, to provide their optical sighting system for U.S. Special Operations Commands M4A1 carbines. Work will be performed in Ann Arbor, MI and is expected to be complete by May 2015. $262,636 will expire at the end of the current fiscal year, on Sept 30/10. The US Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division in Crane, IN manages this contract (N00164-10-D-JN68). EOTech offers a unique technology, thanks to its Holographic Weapon Sight. The firm says that their night-vision compatible sight combines ranging and aiming in one image, which is not affected by problems ranging from mud on the sight, to a cracked sight window. This simple simulator demonstrates the basic sight picture.
(Excerpt) Read more at defenseindustrydaily.com ...
Still a “mouse gun!”
The bullet from that 'mouse gun' has more energy at 150 yards than a .45 ACP does at the muzzle.
Still a mouse gun!
I have an m4. It’s full of surprises.
No matter where your head is positioned, if you can see that red ring and can put that circle on the target, your shot hits the target. It's almost too easy! '-)
I have one on my M-4gery. I like it. To me, nothing is quicker on target under 100 yards, yet it’s plenty accurate out to 300 or beyond. (I have 53 year old eyes.)
Yep. For firing out of position where you can’t get a good cheek weld, nothing is better. For example, firing out of a car window one handed, while driving with the left hand. (I read this one.) An SF guy in a running gun battle in Afghanistan reported that he couldn’t have made lots of impossible “trick shots” firing out the driver’s window with any other sight. Picture it: left hand on wheel, right hand on M4 pistol grip, then dipping your head down now and then to get a quick red bullseye reticle on the bad guy and pull the trigger. Drive, shoot, drive, shoot. An EOTech is great for firing while doing other things, like running, climbing, weaving etc. Just a quick glimpse through the screen from any damn angle, and you are on target.
Specifically why? I don't want to waste a line on my Christmas wish list.
Weren’t those Crane built SBR’s previously using Aimpoint’s ?
I have used the EOTECH for my last three rotations to AF and am stunned by the accuracy. I am getting a little long in the tooth and my eyes were (are) getting bad but the EOTECH really has helped me to get back in the ring.
And a ball-peen hammer at full swing has even more (1/2 mass x velocity squared= force).
.22 FMJ rounds can be deadly. But not as deadly as .30 FMJ rounds traveling at the same velocity. For range (beyond 200 yds), penetration through material like cinder blocks, and first round kills, I'd like a cartridge that is actually adequate and legal for shooting deer. Goes double when the deer are shooting back.
This is what it looks like, folks. The center dot is 1 MOA.
That is cool.
“The bullet from that ‘mouse gun’ has more energy at 150 yards than a .45 ACP does at the muzzle.”
I think he is comparing the .223 to the much better .308 (7.62 X 51), not a pistol round.
MSRP is only $20,000+.
I'm still OK with those iron peep sights -- but that EOTech will spoil you -- in a big hurry!!!
Now that I’ve escaped urban MA and retired out here in the TX boonies, I’d love to trade several pieces of my no-longer-needed “urban hardware” for one of those — even in semiauto only...!
What I like most abuot them are the “run and gun” qualities described at reply 9.
Order is in from felloffatruckareus....
An 30 isn’t as a 50.....where does it end ?
over my career I have been lucky to carry my choice of M4 or M1A.....each has its merits.
Just my experience.
Stay Safe !
Do you somehow think the .223 vs. favorite-caliber-here argument hasn’t been beaten to death unto a dark stain on the carpet long long ago?
We don’t need to go there again when it’s not the topic of this thread.
Some folks like Aimpoints better, and they have their qualities, such as 1,000,000 year battery life.
But I like the combo of outer circle to bracket the target FAST, with a 1 MOA center dot for accurate work.
Aimpoints have a 3 or 4 MOA dot, only.
Not saying Aimpoint is better for everybody......it’s a matter of personal pref.
Oh, don’t be a wet blanket. If it wasn’t for 223 vs 308 and 9mm vs 45, would there even be a reason for the internet?
Have you used any of the “micro” red dots on revolvers? In my next book I have a character with a .357. He’s almost broke, so money is an issue. I’ve been wavering between conventional adjustable target sights on his SW 686, vs a micro red dot. He will make a great impossible shot from a moving car.
Don’t go there!
Yeah I have an acog ta31d and a Comp M Aimpoint now an the night vision works very well for yotes with my comp M.
acog is my 3 gun match rig for now . It has the docter on top, good quick transition.
You know those guys from felloffatruck too? I love those guys.
Don’t be shocked if you hate the EOTech. Or love it to death. It’s like Glock vs 1911, or Ford vs Chevy, between EOTech and Aimpoint. Some of my Aimpoint loving friends think I’m queer or a commie for liking my EOTech. It’s almost a religious schism thing.
But NOBODY is for iron sights except as a backup. Nobody.
You know this shit much better than me, shooting 3 gun matches.
See 32. You rich guys and your ACOGs. When the revolution comes, we are going to take them away. It just ain’t fair.
So I 'settled' for an Aimpoint Comp ML2. I frigging love it.
I'm sure I'd love the EOtech just the same and an ACOG even more but...
You know what else I love? My Bushnell Red Dot. It was less than 50 bucks. So I bought three. One's on my Mossberg. One's on Mrs. L's Mini-14. The other is a backup.
For the price I consider them disposable. And I file them under "BTN".
Better than nothing...
Harumph. I just don't think you're giving the .45-70 its due here!
I really like the EOTech, too. But like I said, on those really sunny Florida days in open ground, that illuminated reticle just disappears, turning the sight into a big ghost ring.
To my eyes, anyway.
I need to take it out on a REALLY bright sunny day and test it. Maybe aim at the sun or sumthin. Probly that sun you got down in SW FL is a lot brighter than up here in Florgia.
Now that doesn't mean I won't plunk down my hard earned Lurker Bucks for the best I can get. Like I said I've got one of them Aimpoint jobbies and it's amazing.
But I couldn't afford two so when I ran across those Bushnells I did a bit of thinking. Always dangerous where I'm concerned I know, but I did it anyway.
So for about 150 or so IIRC I got three of them red dot thingies and if one craps out or gets wrecked, it's NBD. They certainly aren't Aimpoints or ACOG's, but they weren't 400-600 dollars a piece.
Besides putting one of those on a Mini-14, Mossberg, or AK is a bit like putting lipstick on a pig. LOL
Mrs. L loves the Bushnell arrangement I put on her Mini. And you know what? It works "pretty damned good".
And I put the money I saved into ammo and extra mags. Some folks may disagree with the choices I've made. That's their right. But I like to think I've done about the best I could all things considered.
It works for me!
I just keep my jade elephant with me at work or competion.....
I don’t want to see the real one again...
Btw got yer email....will read when I get off travel.....freepin with a smarthone is BS !
I mounted an EOTech on my Swiss Army Knife and now it won’t fit in my pocket and when I throw it I still can’t hit $hit!
I was responding to you doing just that.
Very thorough research by the British came to the conclusion that a 7mm bullet with a medium sized cartridge was the best military round to balance all requirements.
A very thorough study by the US Army in this last decade came to the same conclusion. The 6.8mm on a smaller cartridge was developed, but the optimum round was too long for the .223 AR action, thus necessitating a totally new rifle. This option was considered too expensive.
Although the British designed a new rifle and cartridge in 1913, they held off because of the immediacy of WWI and then held off again because they had so much sunk cost in the .303 and the Enfield rifle was ill suited for higher pressure rounds.
By 1890 the .303 was an obsolete cartridge, yet the British kept using it for another 60 years. I think that we have done the same thing.
And yes I'm aware that a lot of people have been killed with obsolete cartridges.