Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Former IDF Deputy Chief of Staff) Uzi Dayan: Israel must announce Turkish warships casus beli
Jerusalem Post ^

Posted on 06/09/2010 1:45:19 PM PDT by jhpigott

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: ketelone

And that’s my worry. I don’t know what would happen, but I am pretty sure that more than a few countries in NATO would be extremely adverse to the idea of war with Israel. The possibility is that Turkey might be booted from NATO.


81 posted on 06/10/2010 7:46:07 AM PDT by FutureRocketMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jhpigott; Always Independent

“...Time for the Turkish military to take control again...”

They’ve been purged, according to an article that was posted out here a few weeks back. Purged and replaced with Islamicist sycophants - quitely, professionally, and strategically...


82 posted on 06/10/2010 8:46:58 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

That is ashame.


83 posted on 06/10/2010 9:40:28 AM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Always Independent

Actually, it’s a crime.

A shame is something that happens, that couldn’t be helped.

This could have been stopped. By a few well-placed 7.62 rounds; and wasn’t.

It’s what happens when those with malicious motives are allowed to run amok, and the good, decent folk of ANY society (and yes, there’s good decent moslem folk too) don’t smack them down swiftly, promptly, and in final fashion...


84 posted on 06/10/2010 10:26:39 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Joan Kerrey
"That said and considering that Israel is now alone in her quest for her very survival, she must play this correctly or she's finished. Israel is backed into a corner. The only thing she can do is to fight for her very existence."

That, and wait out the tenure of the usurper in chief.

85 posted on 06/10/2010 10:26:41 AM PDT by libs_kma (DEMOCRATS, HOT TAR AND FEATHERS. SOME ASSEMBLY REQUIRED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

I suspect that US forces would resort to active avoidance.
I assume pilots would not “engage” and would play cat and mouse rather than fight those they consider great and sincere allies. At least, I hope that’s what would occur on both sides.


86 posted on 06/10/2010 1:43:08 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Cheetahcat
Will Turkey follow up if Israel sinks their ships? Will Syria allow theTurkish army transit for an invasion of Israel? Why not?

This is a very bad thing. Thank you Obama and those who voted for him.

87 posted on 06/11/2010 7:02:17 AM PDT by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
The Chinese would be fools to attack us. Economically, we are their manufacturing bread and butter - not to mention that they hold massive amounts of our debt instruments.

Maybe so, but its also not so clear cut as that. As we sink deeper into depression will US consumers continue to buy Chinese products, if Americans stop buying them because of economic troubles caused by the depression, then the Chinese will no longer be deterred from fighting the US for fear of losing its share of the US market because they will have already lost the US market. In such a scenario, China would probably then turn to bolster its own domestic market, and work on developing new markets altogether which would give the US less influence over China. Also, Chinese aggressiveness (which has become boldly aggressive towards the US as of late) will depend on other circumstances and other mitigating factors.

The Chinese will not idly sit by and watch the US fight a war on their doorstep in Korea (which it considers to be within its sphere of influence.) They will see a major military presence there as a serious external threat. Also, the Russians will probably not want the US in Korea either, since the US has been surrounding Russia with strategic bases. Most of the US manufacturing base has been outsourced, we are not what we used to be. Also, if the US is engaged in a multi-front war in the middle-east already, the US's power to deal with China would be substantially weakened.

As for us being safe because the Chinese own our debt/treasuries, that is only a temporary security (no pun intended) for the US. The Chinese know that we will probably never be able to pay the debt back to them. We are bankrupt. If we pay them back it will most likely be through monetizing the debt, which would make the money worthless to them anyway. (I suppose that the US could also offer its land/natural resources as collateral to China for its debt, but that would be bordering complete financial slavery and itself be a national security threat. I wouldn't put it past Obama to try it though.)Regardless, if America stops buying Chinese goods or our dollar is rendered worthless because of inflation, then it will become much more difficult to keep an increasingly aggressive Chinese government in check.

88 posted on 06/11/2010 3:02:14 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: old republic

I disagree with you on only one thing: that the Chinese would *let* us fight a war in Korea. The odds are better that the Chinese would declare a “Jiabao Doctrine,” claiming that any attempts by foreign powers to “interfere” in Asian affairs would be treated as aggression against China.

Personally, I do not think that the Chinese wish to subdue America by military force. They can do it by owning us.Their contempt for our self-indulgent behaviors leads them to believe that there is no way that the US will not eventually collapse under its own sloth and greed for consumer goods.


89 posted on 06/11/2010 3:12:27 PM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
The US's weakness lies mainly in its finances not its military. We definitely have military superiority right now, but we are overstretched and unable to fight a major land war at present. Also, as you noted the US's air and sea superiority is unmatched. However, if a war with Iran starts, then the Iranians will cut off a huge portions of the worlds oil supply. This in tandem with the the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, as well as the increased demand of energy any war would cause, would result in a huge spike in oil prices and thus the cost of any such war would be phenomenal to the US.

The US has already spent itself to the breaking point and if it attempts to print money to pay for a huge war (because no one is going to lend it to us), we could have a currency crisis. The US's enemies don't have to beat our air/naval superiority. They only need to bleed us financially to death and that may be enough to overcome the might of the US military.

90 posted on 06/11/2010 3:16:23 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

I agree with you and think a scenario like the one you describe is probably the most likely scenario. I don’t think China is looking for war with the US right now, but I don’t think that they will just let the full might of the US military waltz into their sphere of influence. Any attempt to exert US influence militarily in the region could result in vigorous opposition from the Chinese by economic, diplomatic, and possibly even military means. I think China knows that the US cannot keep up its spending (and therefore its influence)in the region forever, and therefore the Chinese probably prefer to fight the US by waiting us out. The US will destroy itself without any help from the Chinese if it keeps on its present course.


91 posted on 06/11/2010 3:30:54 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan

For that matter, what has ANY NATO state done to justify its membership in the past 20? The USSR is gone.


92 posted on 06/11/2010 11:44:59 PM PDT by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson