Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US: Sinking of SKorean warship not terrorism
AP on Yahoo ^ | 6/28/10 | Matthew Lee - ap

Posted on 06/28/2010 11:12:23 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration is saying that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism, and not enough by itself to put the Pyongyang back on a U.S. terror blacklist.

The State Department said Monday that the March sinking of the frigate Cheonan was a "provocative action" and a violation of the truce that ended the Korean war. But it added that the sinking by a reported North Korean torpedo strike was the act of one state's military against another.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 201003; axisofevil; cheonan; communism; fail; fascism; georgeorwell; korea; koreanwar; liberalfascism; nationalsecurityfail; nkorea; norks; northkorea; orwell; orwellianfascism; prezflustercluck; republicofkorea; sinking; skorean; southkorea; terrorism; terrorist; truce; warship; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2010 11:12:25 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The first anti-American US President is working overtime.
2 posted on 06/28/2010 11:13:24 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Bombing Pearl Harbor wasn't "terrorism" either, it was an act of war.
3 posted on 06/28/2010 11:13:53 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (We couldn't keep the commandments when there was only ONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS.


4 posted on 06/28/2010 11:14:32 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Meanwhile.. North of the Demilitarized Zone.

FRom Michelle's WH garden to NK with Love..?

MMMmmm .. runch.

This undated picture, released from North Korean official Korean Central News Agency on June 21, shows North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il inspecting a radish at the training centre for commanding officers of KPA Unit 593 at undisclosed place in North Korea. The world faces a "dangerous period" as Kim Jong-Il tries to cement in his son as his successor, the CIA chief Leon Panetta said Sunday.« Read less (AFP/KCNA/KNS/File)


5 posted on 06/28/2010 11:14:58 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“The Obama administration is saying that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism, and not enough by itself to put the Pyongyang back on a U.S. terror blacklist.”

I suppose that Iran is not in the list also because “wiping out Israel from the map” is not enough, right?


6 posted on 06/28/2010 11:15:03 AM PDT by greatdefender (If You Want Peace.....Prepare For War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

For once I agree. It’s not an act of terrorism. It’s an act of war.


7 posted on 06/28/2010 11:15:21 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Assuming that the sub that fired the torpedo was NK flagged and crewed by NK Navy personnel then technically he is correct. It was an act of war not terrorism. Terrorism requires that the perpetrators be out of uniform.

Of course the fact that another country commits an act of war and nobody seems to get particularly upset about it is a completely different matter.
8 posted on 06/28/2010 11:15:28 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Thank You, Comrades at the State Department!


9 posted on 06/28/2010 11:15:47 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“The Obama administration is saying that the sinking of a South Korean warship blamed on North Korea was not terrorism,” and the Obama family’s Portuguese Water Dog is really a cat.


10 posted on 06/28/2010 11:16:28 AM PDT by Winged Hussar (http://moveonpleasemoveon.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I would have to agree.

The sinking was nothing but an ACT of WAR.


11 posted on 06/28/2010 11:17:15 AM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
If it was an American ship, would
Pres_ _ent Obama would just claim food additives had been delivered?

John Brennan:"Jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam"


12 posted on 06/28/2010 11:18:56 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is so absurd and such a non- American response, I’m not even sure what to say. But I do know one thing, we just invited another sinking or worse maybe even the downing of a passenger airline flying innocently between Japan and Seoul. And the blood shed will be on Obama’s hands.


13 posted on 06/28/2010 11:20:40 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

So it is an act of war, but the US will not back S Korea in any putative war. Allies come. Allies go. Peace, man.


14 posted on 06/28/2010 11:21:43 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 ( Two-state solution: A bad idea whose time has gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand; Graybeard58
No, not an act of terrorism, but clearly an act of war and a violation of the armistice. It should have been met with swift and decisive military force. Instead, the feckless reaction of South Korea and her allies only emboldens the NORKS.

Exactly right.

15 posted on 06/28/2010 11:22:54 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Exactly.

This was an act of war, not terrorism.


16 posted on 06/28/2010 11:26:06 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (06/15/2010 Obama's Shame-Wow address...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Bingo Friend! If it is anything other than an act of WAR, I don’t know what it is.


17 posted on 06/28/2010 11:26:55 AM PDT by JerseyDvl (Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo3Aj2eqmS8


18 posted on 06/28/2010 11:29:54 AM PDT by 353FMG (ISLAM - America's guaranteed road to destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Of course its not terrorism. It is an act of war.


19 posted on 06/28/2010 11:30:52 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It was not terrorism...it was a blatant act of war and should be treated as such by both S. Korea and the U.S.

There should be a disproportionate response where the S. Korean Navy (which is very modern and very capable) assisted by the U.S. Navy takes out three or four of N. Koreas best frigates and or submarines...plain and simple. You hit us, we will absolutely pound you.

But this Marxist President of ours will give them a pass...because he does not want to ruffle the feathers of the N. Korean Marxist or the Chinese.


20 posted on 06/28/2010 11:31:47 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson