Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why can't we demand Obama's resignation?
June 30, 2010 | 13Sisters76

Posted on 06/30/2010 10:24:34 AM PDT by 13Sisters76

Please forgive the vanity post- I know you all hate them. But I am driven to ask this question- WHy cannot the people demand the resignation of this totallly incompetent man? And not just him- ALL his appointees and czars, AND his SC appointees, as well.

In 1973, the media, backed by a handful of leftist activists, drove Nixon from office- who had been elected in a landslide that the demonRATs can only dream of. The majority of the people did not want this to happen, but it happened anyway. Now it is the PEOPLE who want this man and his minions gone, but WE can't do what THEY did? I know, I know- there are petitions out there and I have signed a few. But I am talking a GROUNDSWELL- I'm talking a major concentrated effort by the people. Someone MUST know how to start this. If the lefties can do it, then certainly those with a brain can.

Isn't it time? Can't we DO this? This is OUR country and those with traitorous, anti-Constitutional plans can't stop us if this is what we demand. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm beginning to think we are running out of time.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obama; resignation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-175 next last
To: 13Sisters76

There is a HUGE difference now, though. In 73 we didn’t have the Internet, we didn’t have talk radio and we didn’t have Fox News. Don’t you see more and more people getting involved now? Knowing more? I went to the march in DC last year and was amazed- no, BLOWN AWAY- by what I saw there. We conservatives aren’t “alone” anymore. And we have a voice. We didn’t then and I remember it only too well.

*******************

I heartily agree with you on these points.


81 posted on 06/30/2010 11:13:04 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (The Democrats' mascot is a jackass. This is because they are asses who are in it for the jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
What then?

They don't wanna know. Gonna happen in 2012 anyway.
Have to hand it to Manson and the Maya.
82 posted on 06/30/2010 11:13:55 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL OR REBEL! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
Admittedly I am grasping at straws to save our country from the ongoing DEVESTATION from EVERY perspective.

“No..he has to be tried by the House and Convicted and Impeached by the Senate.”

As long as the Dems have the majority, that won't happen and even if they don't, the GOP has no brass ones. It is this idiotic mentality of having NO BACKBONE that would prevent that, imho.

“The danger I see is that Zero being a certifiable Narcissist would order the military against the Congress. There is the big question, would they follow his orders?”

But, if the MILITARY sees him as a traitor, they can't obey a TRAITOR. Right? Obama is the issue. He is a traitor and incompetent.

83 posted on 06/30/2010 11:15:38 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: elephant

What appears on the surface to be harsh even “rude” is often what must be said. I don’t take offense when folks criticize what I have said which often needs more clarity.

Socrates found the best way to get at the truth is through argument which is a kind of battle. My comments are of that form. I should be called for it if I get personal and will apologize for it. But I will ridicule ideas and expect to get as good as I give.


84 posted on 06/30/2010 11:17:43 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: 13Sisters76

“The military is placed under civilian authority and that is original Constitutional law. It would be unwise to ever change that.”

So if we have the ground swell effort we’d both like to see ... if we can’t just throw him out, then the MILITARY would have to back up the civilian effort? How would this be determined that the majority of the civilian effort is in favor of this?


85 posted on 06/30/2010 11:20:20 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: nmh

I’m not disagreeing with you.

We have to stand by the Constitution no matter what.

It is the other side in this War to save America that refuses to obey the Constitution. If we look the other way even for a moment we lose everything. That’s all I’m saying.


86 posted on 06/30/2010 11:21:34 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

“Because the oath is just ceremonial as Lt Col Larkin is finding out. Oath breakers abound in the land.”

Isn’t it long over due that taking that oath has MEANING?

Wouldn’t it be a good place to start to get back to where we SHOULD be?


87 posted on 06/30/2010 11:21:56 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

“Because the oath is just ceremonial as Lt Col Larkin is finding out. Oath breakers abound in the land.”

Isn’t it long over due that taking that oath has MEANING?

Wouldn’t it be a good place to start to get back to where we SHOULD be?


88 posted on 06/30/2010 11:22:02 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
Or time to cull the herd.

Well, that's a good point. Those here preparing for CW2 would get just that, I think.

89 posted on 06/30/2010 11:22:05 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 13Sisters76
You do.

It's called "The First Amendment."

But just because you have a right to speak doesn't mean you have a right to be heard or taken seriously.

90 posted on 06/30/2010 11:22:53 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

We face nothing like our ancestors did 1861-5. We survived that. We have survived the American people voting democrat even after the party was shown to be corrupt, traitorous and incompetent. We will survive Urkle and his antics.

Our problem is not him it is the People themselves. 1/3 don’t give a damn, 1/3 love the RATs and 1/3 are patriots.


91 posted on 06/30/2010 11:23:14 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Wait...

He’s black?


92 posted on 06/30/2010 11:23:44 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“Anyone taking advice from DiLorenzo is sunk.”
***************

I would take nobody’s advice either.

But I know truth when I see it.

Why continue to march when it leads to idiots choosing their own king over yours/mine—dump the old self-proven failures—sure, the newbies will develop into scum too—that’s what politicians are, but at least ya can catch yer breath once in awhile.

;)


93 posted on 06/30/2010 11:25:23 AM PDT by gunnyg (Surrounded By The Enemy Within--~ Our "Novembers" Are Behind Us...If Ya Can Grok That!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: 13Sisters76; Non-Sequitur

LOL

Whut up NS?


94 posted on 06/30/2010 11:26:04 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Good grief, what crawled up your ying-yang and died? If you don’t like this particular thread..move on!! I am glad this thread was started..I myself have wondered the exact same thing! And before you start attacking my intelligence, I’d think twice. People with attitudes like yours come off looking like the fools here, not the rest of us.


95 posted on 06/30/2010 11:28:30 AM PDT by SandyLynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

You’re so full of sh*t. Their OATH gives them the right.

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

There is NOTHING in that oath that says we have to obey the Marxist in Chief.


96 posted on 06/30/2010 11:28:52 AM PDT by mojitojoe (When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Yes .... if it was not for idiotic people, even with the fraud factor, SH wouldn't be President.

I am hopeful that the sheeple are waking up!

I truly pray, and I mean that, that they are angry and reeducating themselves on what our country is about.

97 posted on 06/30/2010 11:30:11 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Not a fixation I just know it burns your as* since you are so sympathetic to fudge packers.

Not much. Rattling the cages and making new friends. Same as always.

98 posted on 06/30/2010 11:30:53 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Abraham Lincoln: For when it happened too long ago to blame on George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: 13Sisters76
Yeah- Ole’ Hillary was in on Nixon’s resignation. Apparently all she learned from it was how to get AWAY with it.

Exactly. She has been quoted as wondering why Nixon's people (during the Watergate hearings) didn't simply state they could not remember. I have often wondered the same thing myself. Actually they should have been able to turn the hearings to their political advantage.

99 posted on 06/30/2010 11:30:53 AM PDT by Upstate NY Guy (Gen 15:16 The iniquity of the Amorite is not yet complete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: 13Sisters76

Go ahead - demand until you’re blue in the face.


100 posted on 06/30/2010 11:32:24 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If the answer is "Republican", it must be a stupid question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson