LOL!
Sigh...
The stupid, it hurts.
The Democrats favorite birther.
Asking the Constitution be upheld by checking an ID is now considered frivolous and a political agenda??
Then why did they demand McCain fulfill the requirement??
“Taitz on Monday once again compared herself to Nelson Mandela”
Wait! It just hit me!
She’s saying that she’s a communist.
"It's ridiculous!" said Taitz. "My fans will up the dollars!"
Taitz, in a rare calm mood said "I don't even HAVE a house!
"I'm staying at the County facility! Lien indeed! ESQ!"
When asked for clarification, Taitz began drooling and the interview was terminated.
Hey NOOBie, why don’t you post your articles over at Democratic Underground? It appears that you enjoy making fun of the birth certificate issue.
They will love you.
She may be a little kookie , but she has more gonads than anybody in the Republican party .
I’m not going to say anything negative about Orly. I wish she had experienced more success than she did, but that was not to be.
From an earlier thread today.....
Have you even taken the time to read one page of Dr. Taitz’ motions? How do you know the “clerks” in the Supreme Court are not guilty of altering records? I, for a fact, have spoken directly with Mr. Eric Fossum on July 27 2010, a clerk in the Supreme Court when Dr. Taitz first heard of Justice Alito allegedly denying her motion. She discovered that not only were her documents not entered into the log of the Court, there was no “Official” signature by Justice Alito, or any other Justice. When I asked Mr. Fossum if this was true, he initially told me “A clerk signed it” and when I tried to question him further by asking him “Is this the same as a “Real Justice” signing the documents”he was something less than forthcoming in his answers and finally told me”I’m not going to go down this road any more any more”, and hung up on me.
It appears, to use a metaphor, “The Patients Are Running the Asylum”. Translated: “The clerks Are Running the Supreme Court and the Justices Are Nothing More Than Spectators. As someone who posts here said earlier “He’s alright with that”.
I find it very troubling that people are trying to defend the corruption in all 3 branches of what’s left of our government... Dr. Taitz is absolutely correct in her efforts at exposing the Supreme Court and it’s clerks who appear to be complicit in the ongoing stonewalling we see every day. Have any of these “apologists” for Obama considered the thought that if he is in fact a usurper to the office of President, each and every order he has signed or will sign will be nullified and we then will be subject to the wrath of just about every country in addition to the thought that many brave soldiers fighting and will die wrongful deaths under his unlawful command. This is unacceptable.
Talking Points Memo?? Sniff...
I appreciate what Taitz tried to do.
I smell a ZOT.
Regardless of what anyone feels about Orly Taitz, why should we expect a court that can’t even protect human life capable of making consistent rational decisions.
The Supreme Court is a crap shoot, and has been for decades.
Rule of law has become law of rulers.
So if anyone here is saying, “see, the Supreme Court said so,” as some kind of justification for your own position, I feel sorry for you.