Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stephen Hawking: God was not needed to create the Universe
Daily Telegraph ^ | 02 Sep 2010 | Laura Roberts

Posted on 09/02/2010 6:21:27 AM PDT by tlb

The Big Bang was the result of the inevitable laws of physics and did not need God to spark the creation of the Universe, Stephen Hawking has concluded.

In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.”

“It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”

In June this year Prof Hawking told a Channel 4 series that he didn't believe that a "personal" God existed. He told Genius of Britain: "The question is: is the way the universe began chosen by God for reasons we can't understand, or was it determined by a law of science? I believe the second. If you like, you can call the laws of science 'God', but it wouldn't be a personal God that you could meet, and ask questions."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: atheismandstate; atheist; atheistsupremacist; bigbang; book; god; hawking; stephenhawking; thenogodgod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-224 next last
To: Hegewisch Dupa

LOL!


101 posted on 09/02/2010 6:58:19 AM PDT by TSgt (And the war came.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: tlb

So brilliant and yet so foolish.

Where does he suppose “laws” come from?

Laws represent order, and order comes from design.


102 posted on 09/02/2010 6:58:31 AM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing.

That's a pretty goofy non sequitur, Professor.

103 posted on 09/02/2010 6:59:22 AM PDT by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
“It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”

Uh...

...is it necessary to invoke anything to light it...?

Uh... ...or... ...did it just light itself???

Something must have lit it.

Whatever that Something is...is...well... ...uh God.

Poor Stephen. He's finally gone over the edge.

"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

"Oh what a noble mind is here o'erthrown."

104 posted on 09/02/2010 6:59:50 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("True evil has a face you know and a voice you trust." Greg Iles. "True Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Those who assert that there is no God, have a reason for doing so.
I am so thankful for receiving God's Divine Gift of Faith.
I truly feel sorrowful for those who have not received this gift, or who have received it and then discarded it through the sin of Pride. Say a prayer for Steven. He actually believes his argument holds water.
105 posted on 09/02/2010 7:00:22 AM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkbait
"A point of infinite energy is not “nothing”"

Absolutely right. In fact, it is pretty much impossible to define what "nothing" is. As soon as you define it, it becomes '"something". Philosophers and scientists have grappled with this for centuries. I like the definition put forth by Johathan Edwards (the pastor, theologian and philosopher - not the politician.) "Nothing is what rocks dream of".

106 posted on 09/02/2010 7:00:29 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I think the repeated emphasis on
“And the evening and the morning were the Xth day”


107 posted on 09/02/2010 7:00:59 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Bottom line..ta,ta....,”There Is NO God”. This man is a fool!


108 posted on 09/02/2010 7:01:04 AM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I think the repeated emphasis on
“And the evening and the morning were the Xth day”

were intentional, as is everything God has done.


109 posted on 09/02/2010 7:01:27 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Nabber
"Agreed. Where did gravity come from?"

Where did god come from?

110 posted on 09/02/2010 7:02:13 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Stephen Hawking.
What a dumbass.


111 posted on 09/02/2010 7:02:18 AM PDT by Verbosus (/* No Comment */)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

It’s very godlike of him to make such a statement.


112 posted on 09/02/2010 7:04:27 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I agree with you totally.

The Bible may contain some history and some biology and some astronomy. But its not a science or history book.
Its a moral and theological tome concerning God, man, and salvation.

But NEVER, NEVER post that in an Evolution blog here. They will crucify you - literally.


113 posted on 09/02/2010 7:04:41 AM PDT by ZULU (God, guts and guns made America great,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mlo

That’s the point.

I AM

means eternally existing.

I AM

created the “time” by which you’re attempting to measure Him.


114 posted on 09/02/2010 7:04:50 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: airborne

That is it exactly. Excellent observation.


115 posted on 09/02/2010 7:05:18 AM PDT by cbvanb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I often ask athiests “do wings on a bird have a purpose?” They invariably answer “yes, to fly”. I then ask the same about legs, eyes, etc. They again answer ‘yes’. I then ask them to look up the definition of ‘purpose’ in any dictionary and I inform them that the first synonymous definition they will see listed is ‘intent’. I then ask them to explain ‘intent’ in the absence of intelligence. This generally ends the debate.


116 posted on 09/02/2010 7:05:18 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Verbosus

Stephen Hawking.
What a dumbass.


That’s pretty funny in its succinct manner.
Kinda reminiscient of Andrew Dice Clay.


117 posted on 09/02/2010 7:05:56 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: mlo
"Where did god come from?"

He is eternal, God was not created. Once can't explain existance with out assuming an eternal as an axiom. Thus, either the universe is eternal and had no beginning (Hoyle's "steady state" theory) or there is an eternal God which created the universe. Science currently points to a universe which had a beginning. If one assumes time is a componant of the universe then logic dictates it must have had a beginning. That leaves only God. Which is eactly what first four words of the Bible tell us.

118 posted on 09/02/2010 7:07:20 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Yes.

Consciousness creates form. Always the spirit forms the flesh. It is never the other way around.

CA....


119 posted on 09/02/2010 7:09:58 AM PDT by Chances Are (Whew! Seems I've found that silly grin again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Presuming you didn't come up with that in parallel, Terry Pratchett should be given credit:
In the begining there was nothing, and it exploded.
- Terry Pratchett
Some other favorites of mine:
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
Always be wary of any helpful item that weighs less than its operating manual.
The truth may be out there, but the lies are inside your head.
He says gods like to see an atheist around. Gives them something to aim at.
And my personal all-time favorite:
Give a man a fire and he's warm for the day. But set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life.
- Terry Pratchett
For my money the best author of fantasy humor ever.
120 posted on 09/02/2010 7:10:34 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson