Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon calls mystery missile 'unexplained,' cannot rule out threat
NY Post ^ | 11/09/2010 | NY Post

Posted on 11/09/2010 1:45:41 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour

The Pentagon said Tuesday that a missile launch off the southern coast of California remained “unexplained” and that its mysterious origins meant that it was not possible to rule out any threat to the homeland, Fox News Channel reported.

Earlier Tuesday, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) and NORTHCOM (United States Northern Command) officials told Fox there was no threat, but Pentagon Spokesman Col. Dave Lapan would not confirm that because the military does not know what the missile was or where it came from.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 800; californiamissile; contrail; flight800; mysterymissile; notbreakingnews; tinfoilbrigade; twa800; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Cementjungle
...told Fox there was no threat, but Pentagon Spokesman Col. Dave Lapan would not confirm that because the military does not know what the missile was or where it came from...

Well, that's reassuring.

Give the Pentagon a break. They are stretched very thin trying to implement the repeal of "Don't ask, don't tell."

Missile launches are so 1980's. They forbid homosexuality back then.

41 posted on 11/09/2010 2:00:58 PM PST by Never on my watch (Never let a kid play with matches or run with scissors; and never give a gavel to a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Based on the information at hand at this point, this is absolutely huge. This sort of thing with no government knowledge suggests I need to get in my car with all my worldly possessions I can stuff in it and head from Seattle to my farm in Kentucky RIGHT NOW with LOTS of extra full gas cans.

Something is not right with this.


42 posted on 11/09/2010 2:01:37 PM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Either our guys really don’t know what it was or they know and are not telling. Either way, ignorance or subterfuge it’s of great concern, IMHO.

What if it’s trajectory had been toward the West Coast and not out toward open sea? Are they telling us a missile this size could be successfully launched on 35 miles from our shores and we wouldn’t know what hit us had it come out way?

For my money that’s simply inexcusable. Has our national defense slipped to the point that a ship capable of firing a missile clearly visible from 35 miles away could get into that area without being detected and identified.

I am hoping there is a better explanation forthcoming.


43 posted on 11/09/2010 2:02:33 PM PST by jwparkerjr (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Of course it could just be one of these guys, in which case I would not want to be them it they decided to launch one without getting the proper permits first...


44 posted on 11/09/2010 2:02:33 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
If the Pentagon truly doesn't know, that's bad news.

If they do know but aren't telling us, that's not good news, either.

However, I think I'd prefer the latter to the former. If it's the latter, at least they're on top of things and think, for whatever reason, we don't need to know.

The former means that the military is having a "WTF" moment and are blundering around in the dark.

45 posted on 11/09/2010 2:02:48 PM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
New Hidden Missile System Unknown To Feds

The promotional video for the Club K Missile system is part of the marketing campaign by a private, Russian-based weapons manufacturer. The cruise missile system is hidden in a 40-foot shipping container. It can fire four long range satellite-guided missiles from a ship, train or tractor-trailer.

The Club K is being marketed at international weapons shows as a military weapon. In the hands of a terrorist group the container could easily be smuggled into the United states. It is so new most international security experts have never heard of it. "To look at an entire weapons system that can be put on a cargo ship and deployed is frightening," said Brent Brown an international security consultant, "It is a pretty devastating piece of technology that could have all kinds of collateral damange."

46 posted on 11/09/2010 2:03:25 PM PST by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
I am hoping there is a better explanation forthcoming.

Would probably be a good idea at this point...

47 posted on 11/09/2010 2:04:08 PM PST by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Well at least this beats the Flight 800 case where 300 people didn't see one.
48 posted on 11/09/2010 2:04:30 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What did it miss?


49 posted on 11/09/2010 2:04:35 PM PST by Gator113 (Beauty will devour the Beast in 2012. Kill "Obamamosque"@ Ground Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

They know exactly what it is and who fired it.


50 posted on 11/09/2010 2:05:27 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
Just ask the more than 150 eyewitnesses who watched the rocket that brought down TWA 800 on a clear July evening in 1996.

This is quite different from TWA800. There were NOTAMS for that.

ML/NJ

51 posted on 11/09/2010 2:05:49 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

No,but Charlie Sheen lost a 150,000 dollar watch when he got drunk and stupid last week! HLN was right on top of this story!


52 posted on 11/09/2010 2:06:21 PM PST by 4yearlurker (We got the ball rolling! Stop the Boy King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Maybe it’s just me, but it seems to me like, as a threat, it was traveling in the WRONG DIRECTION. :O

If you can sail a sub up to within 35 miles and launch a missile AWAY from our coast you can just as easily do it and launch the missile the other way. It was a threat.
53 posted on 11/09/2010 2:06:45 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch
Give the Pentagon a break. They are stretched very thin trying to implement the repeal of "Don't ask, don't tell."

ROFL X 10

54 posted on 11/09/2010 2:07:01 PM PST by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Palladin

Mexican gang - Zetas?


55 posted on 11/09/2010 2:07:39 PM PST by donna (Conservatives believe in God, Family, Country. Not money, money, money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

The Pentagon is treating a missile launch off the West coast of the United States as, 'No big deal !'.

Well, it IS a big deal !

What type of platform was it launched from and where did it land ?

Was the launch politically motivated by the Obama administration ?


56 posted on 11/09/2010 2:07:53 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

I doubt these folks have the capability to launch from underwater.


57 posted on 11/09/2010 2:08:29 PM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

With this guy in the W.H. we should all be pissing ourselves.


58 posted on 11/09/2010 2:09:08 PM PST by certrtwngnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

No. Just ruled out from a foreign military. No comment...not ONE SINGLE WORD from Obama or the White House.


59 posted on 11/09/2010 2:09:19 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mazda77; All

Interesting comment from See-BS

NOTAM for LA.
KZLA LOS ANGELES A2832/10 - THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS ARE REQUIRED DUE TO NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER WEAPONS DIVISION ACTIVATION OF W537. IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY, ALL NON-PARTICIPATING PILOTS ARE ADVISED TO AVOID W537. IFR TRAFFIC UNDER ATC JURISDICTION SHOULD ANTICIPATE CLEARANCE AROUND W537 AND CAE 1176. CAE 1155 WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR OCEANIC TRANSITION. CAE 1316 & CAE 1318 WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR OCEANIC TRANSITION. CAE 1177 WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR OCEANIC TRANSITION. W537 ACTIVE, CAE 1176 CLOSED. SURFACE - FL390, 09 NOV 20:00 2010 UNTIL 10 NOV 01:00 2010. CREATED: 08 NOV 20:52 201”

Thanks s7!
Reply to this comment
by buzzfuzzel November 9, 2010 1:13 PM EST
?A mysterious missile launch off the southern California coast was caught by CBS affiliate KCBS’s cameras Monday night,?

If you knew how to read a NOTAM you may not have posted. This missile went up Monday the 8th NLT 7pm local or about 4am Zulu. The NOTAM is warning the airspace for 09 November at a time clearly after the missile was fired. It is perhaps a restriction intended to keep the public out and of the area while an investigation is underway.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8601-201_162-7036716-6.html?assetTypeId=30&blogId=&tag=contentBody;commentWrapper#ixzz14pCoMQrj


60 posted on 11/09/2010 2:10:09 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson