Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver; SunkenCiv; ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; ExTexasRedhead; Cicero; Clemenza; The Mayor; ...
If Rangel wants to get out of the House Ethics Committee charges, all he needs to do is resign from the House, so that the committee will no longer have jurisdiction over him.

In the meanwhile, he's merely playing games over the issue of legal representation in an attempt to garner sympathy from the public. Rangel undoubtedly knows that the procedural rules for the committee are determined by the committee itself.

The constitutional guarantee of legal representation applies to criminal defendants in criminal courts only. In other proceedings, the right to counsel may or may not be granted depending upon the specific rules of the authority presiding over the proceeding and/or the applicable law.

60 posted on 11/15/2010 5:54:00 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93

“all he needs to do is resign from the House, so that the committee will no longer have jurisdiction over him”

That idea would also work, but I’d put that as my number three choice. My number two choice is, he’s found guilty, stripped of everything, and expelled. My number one is, he dies during the trial, preferably by his own hand.


62 posted on 11/15/2010 6:01:26 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93

Rangel’s doing his “victim act“........old reliable for hyphenates in hot water.


69 posted on 11/15/2010 7:12:44 PM PST by Liz (Marxist O/Care provides two brands of toothpaste---mint and plain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93

Thanks for the ping!


74 posted on 11/15/2010 8:06:22 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93

If he would resign from the House..then what? And at 80 years old how long could he keep this show moving if he doesn’t resign?


75 posted on 11/15/2010 10:07:14 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93
It will be a long time before I forget Bill Kristol's exhortation in early August 2010 that Republicans should Just Shut Up about Charlie Rangel.

the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol said on “Fox News Sunday” when asked what Republicans should do about Rangel...The idea that republicans should go around throwing stones at Charlie Rangel is just foolish on their part.”

80 posted on 11/16/2010 5:38:31 AM PST by MaggieCarta (What are we here for but to provide sport for our neighbors, and to laugh at them in our turn?Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93
It will be a long time before I forget Bill Kristol's exhortation in early August 2010 that Republicans should Just Shut Up about Charlie Rangel.

the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol said on “Fox News Sunday” when asked what Republicans should do about Rangel...The idea that republicans should go around throwing stones at Charlie Rangel is just foolish on their part.”

81 posted on 11/16/2010 5:38:36 AM PST by MaggieCarta (What are we here for but to provide sport for our neighbors, and to laugh at them in our turn?Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93
Haven't read through the thread but I hope they don't let him off with just a reprimand!
87 posted on 11/16/2010 2:51:31 PM PST by potlatch ( Life must be lived forward but can only be seen looking backward. - Soren Kierkegaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson