Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Gives a Pass: TSA Won’t Touch Muslims’ Junk
Floyd Reports ^ | Nov. 16, 2010 | Ben Johnson

Posted on 11/16/2010 7:43:43 AM PST by EternalVigilance

Thirty-one-year-old John Tyner, a 31-year-old recently unleashed the “Don’t tase me, Bro” moment of airport security. While about to receive a genital check from TSA security, Tyner agreed to a search of non-intimate areas but said, “If you touch my junk, I’ll have you arrested.” However, Muslim women will not have to face such worries. CNSNews.com has reported that Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — which is frequently tied to domestic terror plots — has been guaranteed that TSA officials will only pat down Muslim women in the head and neck area.

CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.

“Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”

Muslim women will likely opt for the not-very-invasive security pat-down, because most consider airports’ high-image body scans a violation of Islamic Shari’a law. CNS News adds, “In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.”

So, Muslim women will not be subject to a full body scan or a pat-down on much of their elaborately concealed bodies. Feeling secure yet?

Add this to the growing proof that political correctness is not merely totalitarian but suicidal. The president made an exception to airline security protocol big enough to drive a jihad through — and applied it only to the adherents of Islam. Roman Catholic nuns can be groped en masse, but Obama rushed to defend the dignity of Muslim women.

Luckily, Muslim terrorists have no history of using female suicide bombers or hiding explosives in their underwear. Consider this just another reason why one-in-four Americans believe Obama is a Muslim.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: airports; bhoislamism; cair; crushislam; democrats; dhimmicrats; friskingnuns; imamobama; islam; islamofascism; islamuberalles; mullahobama; muslims; obama; palin; security; terrorism; tsa; tsapervs; tsascanners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last
To: TexasRepublic

Fine with me.


141 posted on 11/16/2010 9:46:06 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Without checks and balances, why are you surprised that the courts are capsizing the ship of state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“This is like saying we are going to contain an epidemic by quarantining everyone EXCEPT know carriers...”

We did that. The disease was AIDS. Known carriers were NOT quarantined, at all. And that was back in the 1980’s.

Aren’t “progressives” fun? /s


142 posted on 11/16/2010 9:47:34 AM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

A “blog” is nothing more than a type of software that presents information on the web in a certain way. Such a technical label tells you absolutely nothing about the quality of the content. I’ve seen plenty of “blogs” that contained the highest level of important information, and there sure are plenty of sites that aren’t presented in a blog format that contain nothing but trash.


143 posted on 11/16/2010 9:49:15 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Without checks and balances, why are you surprised that the courts are capsizing the ship of state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

“Muslims can opt out of body pat downs. They can also opt out of the 0bamacare mandate. This is nothing less than Jizya. Ordinary Americans are becoming second class citizens.”

While what you state is true, it is also true that Americans have been second class citizens for some time. Think HB-1 and illegals. As a naturalized citizen, I just couldn’t believe how Americans didn’t see it. This has been coming long time now.


144 posted on 11/16/2010 9:52:55 AM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoNAIS

I’m not about to give CAIR any traffic either.

I just think we need to be careful about posting things that aren’t quite true.


145 posted on 11/16/2010 9:55:32 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I think that any article that makes an unsubstantiated declarative statement in the title is doing a diservice.

Many people read the title and think it’s true. The author didn’t bother to source it.

Just my opinion.


146 posted on 11/16/2010 9:56:53 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

I agree with that. Which part is bothering you?


147 posted on 11/16/2010 9:57:00 AM PST by NoNAIS (Yet another Government program not needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
“Might be best if they pulled the thread. I really wish that blogs didn't appear in the sidebar, much less be posted, for this very reason. You can't always confirm the crap on them. Threads like this that spread lies only hurt FR. jmo”

I agree. There is so much real stuff out there to be upset about, there is no reason to get upset over stories that are not true.

148 posted on 11/16/2010 9:59:04 AM PST by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Having designed websites, I am familiar with how a blog works. While there are sites that lie and others that are factual, I think that threads that are aimed at agitating, calling for boycotts, without the facts being confirmed are detrimental to FR. jmo


149 posted on 11/16/2010 10:00:26 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: NoNAIS
Which part is bothering you?

This unconfirmed rumor:

Obama Gives a Pass: TSA Won’t Touch Muslims’ Junk

150 posted on 11/16/2010 10:02:22 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

Yes, you’ve made that quite clear.


151 posted on 11/16/2010 10:05:03 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Without checks and balances, why are you surprised that the courts are capsizing the ship of state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

The title - got it.

TSA has agreed not to pat down anywhere else on a female in a Hajib but head and neck. That’s not “Junk”.


152 posted on 11/16/2010 10:06:13 AM PST by NoNAIS (Yet another Government program not needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Ok folks, I see a good money making opportunity. How about opening up Bourqa stores at all airports? We can rent them at all airports? They just turn them in at the arrival airport and get their deposit back.


153 posted on 11/16/2010 10:16:49 AM PST by luv2ndamend (They call themselves greens because they're too yellow to admit they're reds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

There is a thread that is about the TSA and how the airports have a choice. Airports don’t have to use TSA.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2627947/posts

In fact, yesterday there was a link telling people which airports DO have the scaners.

http://consumerist.com/2010/09/updated-list-of-full-body-scanners-at-airports.html

DOMESTIC AIRPORTS:
· Albuquerque International Airport (ABQ)
· Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Airport (ATL)
· Baltimore-Washington International (BWI)
· Boise Airport (BOI)
· Boston-Logan International (BOS)
· Brownsville-South Padre Island Airport (BRO)
· Buffalo-Niagara International (BUF)
· Charlotte Douglas International (CLT)
· Chicago-O’Hare Airport (ORD)
· Columbus International Airport (CMH)
· Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP)
· Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport (DFW)
· Denver International Airport (DEN)
· Detroit Metro Wayne County Airport (DTW)
· Harrisburg International Airport (HIA)
· Indianapolis International Airport (IND)
· Jacksonville International Airport (JAX)
· Laredo International Airport (LRD)
· Las Vegas-McCarran Airport (LAS)
· Los Angeles International Airport (LAX)
· McAllen-Miller International Airport (MFE)
· Memphis International Airport (MEM)
· Miami International Airport (MIA)
· Milwaukee Mitchell Airport (MKE)
· Nashville International AIrport (BNA)
· Phoenix Sky Harbor (PHX)
· Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT)
· Providence-T.F. Green International (PVD)
· Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU)
· Richmond International Airport (RIC)
· Rochester International Airport (RST)
· Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC)
· San Diego International Airport (SAN)
· San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
· Tampa International Airport (TPA)
· Tulsa International Airport (TUL)
· Valley International Airport (HRL)
· Washington DC’s Reagan Airport (DCA)

Maybe a boycott of THESE SPECIFIC airports would be a good idea.


154 posted on 11/16/2010 10:17:14 AM PST by TruthConquers (Delendae sunt publicae scholae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Time to sue. Past time actually.


155 posted on 11/16/2010 10:50:23 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Here’s the link to the same article from the same source posted yesterday...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2627592/posts


156 posted on 11/16/2010 10:58:14 AM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Sounds like a prime cadidate for lawsuit under the “equal protection” clause. Clear discrimination based on religion.

I think we should all drop trousers at the airport and give them a nice full moon. :)


157 posted on 11/16/2010 11:01:33 AM PST by kgrif_Salinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: panthermom
I opted out once already. Damn near made their heads explode. They were seriously not ready for it. Eventually I got wanded and was not groped. Might be different today.
158 posted on 11/16/2010 11:02:29 AM PST by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Not necessarily replying to you, but...

This just in from CNS News....

Napolitano: ‘More to Come’ on Women in Hijabs Undergoing Airport Full-Body Pat-Downs

CA....

159 posted on 11/16/2010 11:02:29 AM PST by Chances Are (Seems I've found that silly grin again....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

Weird. I searched the title before I posted. It didn’t come up.


160 posted on 11/16/2010 11:10:41 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Without checks and balances, why are you surprised that the courts are capsizing the ship of state?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson