Posted on 12/07/2010 9:08:51 AM PST by RightFighter
Headline only so far...
>>They should have chosen the TEA PARTY.
I’m glad they didn’t. There are enough wanker RINOs trying to ride a wave in a Tea Cup into The Party(tm)’s inner sanctum.
The American Tea Party, both in 1776 and Present, has never been about personal recognition or “party” pandering.
It is a process of governmental Reformation - and that process will continue, regardless of whether the Useful Idiots in the MSM will admit it exists or not.
OH....Yeah, he should be Person of the Year.
WHen I was in medical school, it seems like I read Time cover to cover. The articles were in depth, and in my opinion accurate, but then again who knows looking back now 35 years or so ago....
Now ther is no question. Apart from the fact that they give you 15 pages....for a couple bucks....the ultimate rip off....each issue is a scam toting the latest liberal rug.
I love the person of the year... for what was it 2005 or 2006? Now think about this for a minute...WE’re at war...In the middle of the surge....The hint of democracy growing in Iraq....And who do they pick?
“You”.....
It’s not person of the year.... It’s media person of the year...or maybe I’ll go along with most influential person of the year....
WHy not Michael Jackson... why not Elvis from grave?
And I love it when they lump a couple people together, like the Gates’ and Bono....I think Bill Gates is certainly worthy....but if TIME had done their homework...he’d be person of the year 30 years ago....not now...
Ok...I’ll buy that choice...
what is nuts is that the media and the public are lying to each other and themselves.
the person to blame here is the homosexual private who stole the details, wikileaks is showing the world like FOX what he got.
Now I wonder why the media will not talk about the person who is really responsible for all of this/
The point of person of the year is sensationalism. It’s not news. It has not been for years. I’m sure the ‘article’ will be right after Kardashian quotes of the week and socialist pap about incandescent light bulbs.
It’s an irrelevant news magazine, just like Newsweek.
Does anyone even read that magazine anymore?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.