Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking On Fox: VA Judge Declares Individual Mandate In ObamaCare UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Fox News | 12/13/10 | Fox News

Posted on 12/13/2010 9:21:01 AM PST by careyb

Just in... will keep you posted...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; bhohealthcare; commiecomeuppence; cuccinelli; healthcare; individualmandate; obamacare; ruling; scotus; statesrights; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last
To: careyb

Great, because as long as it is the court system it cannot be enacted - no budgetary item can be done as it is the courts. ObummerCare is DOA.


21 posted on 12/13/2010 9:24:31 AM PST by hondact200 ( Obama is Nuckin Futs!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

Is Clinton doing the press conference on this one too?


22 posted on 12/13/2010 9:24:41 AM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

What does it take to get his decision overruled? Plenty of corrupt judges around to find fault with it.


23 posted on 12/13/2010 9:24:41 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

/cheers!!!!!!!


24 posted on 12/13/2010 9:24:43 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Department of Education—they’re all unconstitutional, too, but they’re not going away in the near future. So we’ll have to see if this holds up.


25 posted on 12/13/2010 9:24:55 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (Tenth Amendment constitutional conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

BTTT


26 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:08 AM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

out=put


27 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:10 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: careyb

That pesky Constitution.


28 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:20 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

FOXNEWS

Forcing someone to buy something is NOT economic activity. Thus, the Commerce Clause cannot be imposed (which was in the legislation), per Greta Van Susteren.

FED does not have authority under the Commerce Clause.

Question about whether it is a tax or not.

Legislators would not call it a tax. Now, it can be argued as a tax.


29 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:28 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

Wooooooo! Hooooooo!


30 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:31 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

Greta analyzing the ruling right now. It’s all about the commerce clause...finds it “fascinating!”


31 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:31 AM PST by truthkeeper ( God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: careyb

LOL LOL LOL


32 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:39 AM PST by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Greta says DOJ will fight it by calling it a tax...

Legislators didn’t want to call it a tax for political reasons...

But DOJ lawyers call it a tax in defending it...

REPEAT: REQUIRING SOMEONE TO BUY SOMETHING IS NOT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY AND THEREFORE THE FED GOV HAS NO AUTHORITY IN THE MANDATE....


33 posted on 12/13/2010 9:25:49 AM PST by careyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ShandaLear

We got our Woo Hoo’s in at the very same second.


34 posted on 12/13/2010 9:26:16 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: careyb

Best news of today...on to the next step. Thank you, your honor.!


35 posted on 12/13/2010 9:26:21 AM PST by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Great says that if SCOTUS declares the individual mandate unconstitutional then there is no funding for ObamaCare... in other words it’s dead.


36 posted on 12/13/2010 9:27:00 AM PST by careyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: careyb

3 cheers for my homestate of Virginia!!! round 1...gong


37 posted on 12/13/2010 9:27:09 AM PST by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Greta on Fox said there would not be an injunction because this prevision doesn’t kick in until 2013 so there is no problems with time.


38 posted on 12/13/2010 9:27:14 AM PST by animal172 (Where are you America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Bwaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! LIBs say collective “OUCH!”


39 posted on 12/13/2010 9:27:17 AM PST by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: careyb

1501 funded the Health Care bill.

If the judges ruling is upheld by the SC, the health care bill will not be funded.

[Legal applies to the state of Virginia. Could probably then be applied to all other states.]


40 posted on 12/13/2010 9:27:18 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson