Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PUT THE LAME DUCKS OUT OF OUR MISERY!
Vanity ^ | 12-21-2010 | Dick Bachert

Posted on 12/20/2010 9:31:55 PM PST by Dick Bachert

I am sending the following to my new congressional representative and, if you agree, please do likewise. This country is in ENOUGH trouble without defeated and often embittered officials vindictively getting in a few licks at the folks who sent them packing -- not to mention the REST of us!

Representative XXXX,

The recent "lame duck" activity in the House and Senate makes clear the need for legislation to prevent ousted incumbents from introducing or voting on legislation prior to the seating of the new member. When an incumbent elected public official is not returned to office, it is the same as when an employee is fired. The people (obviously) no longer trust that person to represent them. It would be bizarre for a fired employee in the private sector to be allowed to set binding policy for his/her replacement. It shouldn’t be different for elected officials. In the private sector in which I worked for 40 years, a fired employee is asked to pack up and move out THAT DAY, some with the assistance of burly security folks.

As soon as possible, I am asking you to put forth legislation to prevent "Lame Ducks" from introducing legislation or voting after they have been "fired" by the people who sent them to Washington.

For God and the Republic,

Dick Bachert


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: congress; lameduck; lameducks; senators
Time to end the idiocy we've witnessed over the last few weeks!
1 posted on 12/20/2010 9:31:56 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Thank you very much for posting this, Dick Bachert. Will do!


2 posted on 12/20/2010 9:42:45 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

It will need to approved by 2/3 of both houses and ratified by 3/4 of the states.


3 posted on 12/20/2010 9:45:26 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Then we keep cleaning those two places OUT until we get those numbers. And if we do that, the states should not be a problem if, in fact, that is necessary. I’ll need to research the Constitutional language to see if an Amendment is required for that.


4 posted on 12/20/2010 10:24:01 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
Good luck with saying "pretty please." These elected career criminals are laughing all the way to the bank. The present fun and games just underscores the need for term limits. Did I mention that these criminals are literally immune from prosecution?

The only ones safe from almost instant corruption are the first termers. And they should be watched closely. Otherwise, we will continue getting an endless train of "legal" criminals, actually elected career criminals like :
Bawney Fwank, Chris Dodd, John Conyers, Hilary Clinton, Maxine Waters, Charles Rangel, John Murtha, William Jefferson...

Ignore meaningful eligibilita standards, and what you see is what you get.

5 posted on 12/20/2010 10:25:58 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
I’ll need to research the Constitutional language to see if an Amendment is required for that.

Trust me, it is.

6 posted on 12/20/2010 11:32:29 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
If it was a Lame Duck Republican Congress the Commies would be Howling Moaning and Groaning...Illegitimate! But not a peep out of our brave Republican fighters...Phooey!
7 posted on 12/21/2010 12:15:04 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

They should be treated like many fired employees. They should be required to vacate their offices the day before election day. If defeated, they and their staff should be barred from their offices, and not allowed to set foot in the U.S. Capitol. Anything they leave in their offices should be considered government property.

In other words: NO LAME DUCKS.

And the new Members should be sworn in within a month, or sooner.


8 posted on 12/21/2010 2:29:14 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Did anyone really think they were just gonna go away? I knew the day after the election that if the republicans did not show up in force and block everything that the commies would pass every freedom cutting measure they could. In the senate we had the same commie republicans from the same commie states voting in lockstep with the commies. We need to clean up the senate in 2012, and get rid of as many entrenched commies as possible.


9 posted on 12/21/2010 5:07:54 AM PST by joe fonebone (The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Great idea! Meanwhile, any way we can filibuster our way through the next two weeks?


10 posted on 12/21/2010 5:17:10 AM PST by privatedrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
It's an interesting idea and certainly this Congress has been abusing the last vestiges of its power before the new one is seated.

Historically, since the 20th Amendment's ratification, lame duck sessions have been uncommon with several multi-year gaps along the way (1940-'54, '56-'68, '84-1992).

However, lame duck sessions have occurred with nearly every Congress since Bill Clinton's first term which is far too often in my view. I've read 39 states don't even allow lame duck sessions to avoid the problems we're seeing.

11 posted on 12/21/2010 7:49:34 AM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson