Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/02/2011 3:16:09 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Wait a sec... so you mean to say that a diet plan for YOU might be the opposite of a diet plan for ME?

You mean people are different?

Isn’t that awful? How un-PC!

/sarc


2 posted on 01/02/2011 3:21:21 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Atkins is high protein, high fat. It works.


3 posted on 01/02/2011 3:23:48 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

8 Twinkie diet helps nutrition professor lose 27 pounds
By Madison Park, CNN reporter

(CNN) — Twinkies. Nutty bars. Powdered donuts. For 10 weeks, Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University, ate one of these sugary cakelets every three hours, instead of meals. To add variety in his steady stream of Hostess and Little Debbie snacks, Haub munched on Doritos chips, sugary cereals and Oreos, too.

His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most — not the nutritional value of the food. The premise held up: On his “convenience store diet,” he shed 27 pounds in two months.

For a class project, Haub limited himself to less than 1,800 calories a day. A man of Haub’s pre-dieting size usually consumes about 2,600 calories daily. So he followed a basic principle of weight loss: He consumed significantly fewer calories than he burned. His body mass index went from 28.8, considered overweight, to 24.9, which is normal. He now weighs 174 pounds.

But you might expect other indicators of health would have suffered. Not so. Haub’s “bad” cholesterol, or LDL, dropped 20 percent and his “good” cholesterol, or HDL, increased by 20 percent. He reduced the level of triglycerides, which are a form of fat, by 39 percent. “That’s where the head scratching comes,” Haub said. “What does that mean? Does that mean I’m healthier?

Or does it mean how we define health from a biology standpoint, that we’re missing something?” Despite his temporary success, Haub does not recommend replicating his snack-centric diet. “I’m not geared to say this is a good thing to do,” he said. “I’m stuck in the middle. I guess that’s the frustrating part. I can’t give a concrete answer. There’s not enough information to do that.”

Two-thirds of his total intake came from junk food. He also took a multivitamin pill and drank a protein shake daily. And he ate vegetables, typically a can of green beans or three to four celery stalks.

Families who live in food deserts have limited access to fresh fruits and vegetables, so they often rely on the kind of food Haub was eating.

“These foods are consumed by lots of people,” he said. “It may be an issue of portion size and moderation rather than total removal. I just think it’s unrealistic to expect people to totally drop these foods for vegetables and fruits. It may be healthy, but not realistic.”

Haub’s body fat dropped from 33.4 to 24.9 percent. This posed the question: What matters more for weight loss, the quantity or quality of calories? His success is probably a result of caloric reduction, said Dawn Jackson Blatner, a dietitian based in Atlanta, Georgia. “It’s a great reminder for weight loss that calories count,” she said. “Is that the bottom line to being healthy? That’s another story.”

Blatner, a spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association, said she’s not surprised to hear Haub’s health markers improved even when he loaded up on processed snack cakes. Being overweight is the central problem that leads to complications like high blood pressure, diabetes and high cholesterol, she said. How well are you managing your diabetes? “When you lose weight, regardless of how you’re doing it — even if it’s with packaged foods, generally you will see these markers improve when weight loss has improved,” she said. Before jumping on the Ding Dong bandwagon, Blatner warned of health concerns.

“There are things we can’t measure,” said Blatner, questioning how the lack of fruits and vegetables could affect long-term health. “How much does that affect the risk for cancer? We can’t measure how diet changes affect our health.” I was eating healthier, but I wasn’t healthy. I was eating too much. —Professor Mark Haub

Haub’s sample day

Espresso, Double: 6 calories; 0 grams of fat

Hostess Twinkies Golden Sponge Cake: 150 calories; 5 grams of fat

Centrum Advanced Formula From A To Zinc: 0 calories; 0 grams of fat

Little Debbie Star Crunch: 150 calories; 6 grams of fat

Hostess Twinkies Golden Sponge Cake: 150 calories; 5 grams of fat

Diet Mountain Dew: 0 calories; 0 grams of fat

Doritos Cool Ranch: 75 calories; 4 grams of fat

Kellogg’s Corn Pops: 220 calories; 0 grams of fat

whole milk: 150 calories; 8 grams of fat

baby carrots: 18 calories; 0 grams of fat

Duncan Hines Family Style Brownie Chewy Fudge: 270 calories; 14 grams of fat

Little Debbie Zebra Cake: 160 calories; 8 grams of fat

Muscle Milk Protein Shake: 240 calories; 9 grams of fat

Totals: 1,589 calories and 59 grams of fat

On August 25, Haub, 41, started his cake diet focusing on portion control. “I’m eating to the point of need and pushing the plate or wrapper away,” he said.
He intended the trial to last a month as a teaching tool for his class. As he lost weight, Haub continued the diet until he reached a normal body mass index.

Before his Twinkie diet, he tried to eat a healthy diet that included whole grains, dietary fiber, berries and bananas, vegetables and occasional treats like pizza. “There seems to be a disconnect between eating healthy and being healthy,” Haub said. “It may not be the same. I was eating healthier, but I wasn’t healthy. I was eating too much.” He maintained the same level of moderate physical activity as before going on the diet. (Haub does not have any ties to the snack cake companies.)

To avoid setting a bad example for his kids, Haub ate vegetables in front of his family. Away from the dinner table, he usually unwrapped his meals. Study: U.S. obesity rate will hit 42 percent Haub monitored his body composition, blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose, and updated his progress on his Facebook page, Professor Haub’s diet experiment. To curb calories, he avoided meat, whole grains and fruits. Once he started adding meat into the diet four weeks ago, his cholesterol level increased. Haub plans to add about 300 calories to his daily intake now that he’s done with the diet. But he’s not ditching snack cakes altogether.

Despite his weight loss, Haub feels ambivalence. “I wish I could say the outcomes are unhealthy. I wish I could say it’s healthy. I’m not confident enough in doing that. That frustrates a lot of people. One side says it’s irresponsible. It is unhealthy, but the data doesn’t say that.”


5 posted on 01/02/2011 3:28:04 PM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Once again, the obesity problem is being overcomplicated by quack theories and fad diets.

Root cause of most obesity is an overabundance of food and lack of physical activity. That's a nasty combination that has produced a nation of fatties.

For the majority of human civilization, food was scarce and the average human engaged in an enormous amount of physical activity (compared to today).

This is how our bodies are wired and it will take many generations to adjust for it as our technological progress has greatly outpaced our evolutionary cycle.

9 posted on 01/02/2011 3:39:25 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: austinmark; FreedomCalls; IslandJeff; JRochelle; MarMema; Txsleuth; Newtoidaho; texas booster; ...
FReepmail me if you want on or off the diabetes ping list.
12 posted on 01/02/2011 3:49:21 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Remember that the human body does not have any need for grains in any way. In fact, grains bring disease and fat. There is absolutely no good reason (aside for convenience or addiction to their sugars) to eat grains.

http://www.marksdailyapple.com/why-grains-are-unhealthy/

Your diet should be made up of clean, grassfed, free-range meats, fish, eggs, and dairy from clean animals, healthy fats such as pastured butter and coconut oils, fats from healthy animals, some olive oil (never heated) and avocados, and fresh, organic vegetables and fruits. Eating this way makes you a fat burner for energy.

As opposed to eating sugar and grains (same thing, in the body) - this makes you a sugar burner and leads you into insulin resistance and metabolic disease, and cancers and illness, all of which feed off of sugar.

I wish I learned this 20 years ago!


26 posted on 01/02/2011 4:23:25 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Ping


27 posted on 01/02/2011 4:33:55 PM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I went on the Dukan Diet.

I lost a lot of weight fairly easily. It’s very popular in Europe. So much so that there are restaurants in France and England that cater to the dieter’s meal plans.

Combined with Pilates I look freakin’ amazing.

http://www.dukandiet.co.uk/


43 posted on 01/02/2011 4:54:01 PM PST by Mountain Bike Vomit Carnage (Tattoos are for identifying corpses and criminals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
This is the Paleolithic Diet.
50 posted on 01/02/2011 5:07:40 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

One of the reasons my mother died at such a young age of 54 was diet pills.

Yes, she was overweight; but the diet pills gave her a heart attack and other things.

I will never touch one.


55 posted on 01/02/2011 5:14:36 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I have to eat pretty much what’s available.


63 posted on 01/02/2011 5:47:19 PM PST by Twinkie (Awake and strengthen that which remains . . . . . . . . Revelation 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

4 AM - Thanks! ;-)


81 posted on 01/02/2011 6:56:57 PM PST by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Nova or Nature had a show where they studied why certain native Americans in the southwest had weight problems.

Turns out, their genes themselves are oriented towards a certain time of year - the time when the fruit comes on the cacti. (I think it was cacti)

Fruit is a very quick source of energy in lean times. In not-so-lean times, the body is geared to convert as much extra sugar as it can get it’s hands on into fat.


89 posted on 01/02/2011 7:12:05 PM PST by djf (Touch my junk and I'll break yur mug!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Fructose is the problematic sugar our bodies turn to fat the most readily, and if you are programmed to be fat, an apple will make you that much fatter.

I've been having a problem with Acid Reflux, and I just read that apples are very good for that problem.

112 posted on 01/03/2011 4:36:36 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
A Diet Manifesto: Drop the Apple and Walk Away

More Microsoft FUD, oh wait, wrong Apple, nevermind.

118 posted on 01/03/2011 8:55:09 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson