This is a bad idea on so many different levels...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: markomalley
DEFUND THE EPA!!!! Then move on to the Dept. of Edu. and Energy.
Viva the 10th Amendment!
2 posted on
01/21/2011 11:17:03 AM PST by
mc5cents
(Government doesn't solve problems, it subsidizes them. -- Ronald Reagan)
To: markomalley
What a great way to keep the prices of corn, meat, gas, and products in general down!
(Does this really need a sarc tag?)
3 posted on
01/21/2011 11:17:36 AM PST by
Immerito
(Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
To: markomalley
Not the first of which is that a lot of people will be too dumb to realize their cars are not equipped to handle the extra ethanol crap in their gas.
With the Republicans in control here in cheesehead nation, I don’t think we will be seeing 15% crap at any of our gas stations. As much as Obama wants to whore out to ADM, the people ain’t gonna put up with craptacular 15% gas.
4 posted on
01/21/2011 11:17:46 AM PST by
milwguy
To: markomalley
5 posted on
01/21/2011 11:17:57 AM PST by
Red Badger
(Whenever these vermin call you an 'idiot', you can be sure that you are doing something right.)
To: markomalley
Awesome! Who needs gas? We can run our cars on cronyism!
6 posted on
01/21/2011 11:18:37 AM PST by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: markomalley
How about requiring the gas stations to list their alcohol percentages so I know where to shop and where to avoid. Ethanol contains about 30% less energy than gasoline, so 10% ethanol should drop mileage by about 3% and 15% ethanol should drop it by 4.5%.
7 posted on
01/21/2011 11:18:39 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
To: markomalley
I have a 2003...and I’m pretty sure it says the limit is 10%.
To: markomalley
It makes you wonder whether the EPA is purposely trying to destroy all of the older vehicles so that more of these electric buggies will be sold.
I wouldn’t put it past them and it has nothing to do with protecting the environment.
When are the republicans going to defund that agency?
9 posted on
01/21/2011 11:19:38 AM PST by
puppypusher
(The World is going to the dogs.)
To: markomalley
Apparently, people were getting too many mpgs.
10 posted on
01/21/2011 11:20:02 AM PST by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: markomalley
Well, it doesn’t matter to me, because my car is a flex-fuel vehicle, and can run with ethanol blends up to 85%! There’s just hardly any E85 pumps around here in rural Missouri, though. Nearest ones are in Springfield.
13 posted on
01/21/2011 11:23:14 AM PST by
wk4bush2004
(PALIN 2012! AMERICA WILL SHINE AGAIN!)
To: markomalley
Had two Hondas, my SIL has one. The catalytic 2nd stage O2 sensors kept alarming. Ethanol can damage wide band O2 sensors. My solution was to not use any gas that had ethanol....problem solved. Corn is for eating, not burning (unless you forget the popcorn in the MW). Screw ethanol.
14 posted on
01/21/2011 11:25:38 AM PST by
Gaffer
To: markomalley
16 posted on
01/21/2011 11:26:43 AM PST by
Skeez
(O)
To: markomalley; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
Not only did GWB start us on this ethanol disaster in his energy bill compromise but that bill also outlawed normal light bulbs.
So now you are forced to buy engine fuel full of water that destroys your auto engine, but you must (in the future) buy the toxic florescent light bulbs that will poison your home and family if broken.
Obama certainly got a running start with GWB and Senate republicans progressive policies. I guess this my Bush rant for the week:)
18 posted on
01/21/2011 11:27:24 AM PST by
sickoflibs
("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: markomalley
Aside from trashing the environment and wasting huge quantities of diesel fuel and petrochemical-based fertilizer to grow corn, what will this do to our vehicles? Boehner better get after the EPA fascists real fast on this one, otherwise he is part of the problem.
19 posted on
01/21/2011 11:27:30 AM PST by
Bedford Forrest
(Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
To: markomalley
So stations have to add a seperate tank and pumps just for this? What a waste of resources...
Redline out the EPA in the next budget.
21 posted on
01/21/2011 11:29:50 AM PST by
PogySailor
(The ruling class will not go down easily. And neither will their paid hacks.)
To: markomalley
That’s not going to be good for my motorcycle’s gas tank.
22 posted on
01/21/2011 11:30:16 AM PST by
sigzero
To: markomalley
Time to defund and dissolve the EPA.
Well, it was time to do that a long time ago, but no time like the present, hmmmm?
I don't care how many bureaucrats it puts out of work - these creeps have done far too much damage to the private sector.
23 posted on
01/21/2011 11:31:01 AM PST by
Allegra
To: markomalley
26 posted on
01/21/2011 11:33:29 AM PST by
Qbert
("I seem to smell the stench of appeasement in the air" - Margaret Thatcher)
To: markomalley
188,000 marinas have refused to sell 15% corn juice... just say no to any ethanol... it kills our economy... it kills our energy independence and it destroys our food supplies.
LLS
27 posted on
01/21/2011 11:33:50 AM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES!!!)
To: markomalley
Regulating the environment is not an enumerated power granted to Congress in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution! The EPA is unconstitutional and must be abolished!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson