Posted on 01/24/2011 4:21:09 PM PST by RobinMasters
Texas, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona — have or plan to introduce bills that would require all candidates for president or vice president of the United States to show his or her birth certificate to be on the state ballot.
(I thought some had passed the bill, but I guess not)
But if they do, how can he possibly run?
(I thought some had passed the bill, but I guess not)
But if they do, how can he possibly run?" <<<<<
Uhmmm... sounds pretty easy to me.... wouldn't the POTUS have direct access to the Best Forgers oF ALL Time???
Didn’t I read something about a typewriter being secured to match records from that period, and waiting for an ‘aging process’ somewhere?
If Zero was born in January, 1961, then the United States has 57 states.
What’s frustrating is that the theory doesn’t fit with the index data the HDOH has put out or with the lt governor’s statement that there was no legal name change order.
The law governing name changes in Hawaii is at http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol12_Ch0501-0588/HRS0574/HRS_0574-0005.htm .
Hillbuzz is wrong about something. Race IS listed on the photo copy of my Certificate of Live Birth - the Long Form, the one I had to call Onaka to get. It is down at the bottom. It is typed in, not hand written. On the Photo copy of the original my Mom gave me, that bottom part is not there. The green paper ends in that photocopy. The form she copied for me is not 8 x 11, its a lot shorter.
Some other notation was made in a typed in format which DOES show in the Hawaii generated copy, and Race appears on my computer printed COLB.
So it might be, that on a form being filled out by a mom and dad at the event of a birth does not note race on it, but appears on a different form which is colated together later in a full record. That is how it appears to me sitting here looking at my own records.
Bizarre.
“Either way, I don’t think we can draw any conclusions from Barry stating a different birthdate.”
Indeed, given the pack of lies he’s told on a whole host of issues, at some level it would be “newsworthy” if for once he opted to actually tell the truth.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2400624/posts
it’s complicated...but as you follow this, remember that the date, if written as the result of KENYAN or EQUATORIAL GUINEA records, is:
JANUARY 8, 1961.
or a date of birth that belonged to a child that died...
Looking at only the facts about his origins — few as they may be — opens up a whole new avenue of research. Is there any evidence whatsoever, other than his word, that he was born in August?
No. Not that I can think of, only the CoLB.
Other than the U of H transcript, does any evidence place Stanley Ann in Hawaii prior to 1962-3? Could those U of H courses be by correspondence?
Have you considered the possibility that Anna Obama was a totally different person? That it was Anna Obama who was enrolled at the U of HI?
Since his cleverly stated autobiography has been drummed into the public consciousness for 15 years, it’s hard to disregard all we’ve been told and stick to known facts.
Correct. It's Stanley Ann Dunham over and over again...drip drip drip, like Chinese Water-torture. No one ever saw her in Hawaii. Only Neil Abercrombie said he saw them together. HA! Guess who he saw? He saw the kenyan with ANNA!
There may be unscrubbed records under the alternate dates.
I doubt it very much...it seems the child arrived in Hawaii when he was two or three years age.
NOT IF THE INFORMATION CAME FROM A KENYAN OR EQUATORIAL GUINEA DOCUMENT.
And I read that date as JANUARY 1961, which is what it would be if the date came from a Kenyan or Equatorial Guinea document.
Just in brief, let me say I think that the child arrived in Hawaii from lord knows where when he was two or three years of age, and Frank Marshall Davis and his wife may have been his carer for a time. The Davis marriage ended in 1970. They had five children.
1970 - That’s when the kenyan arrived on the scene.
If the information came from a Kenyan or Equatorial Guinea document, the date IS JANUARY, 8, 1961.
Depends on the accuracy of that report...and where that date actually came from. If it came from a document that had its origin in Kenya or Equatorial Guinea, and if it does relate to zero, then it is JANUARY 8, 1961.
When and where they met, and IF they ever met, remains an open question. It's my conjecture that Stanley Ann Dunham never laid eyes on the Kenyan until his 1970 visit to Hawaii.
/bingo (several of ‘em, in fact)
:’)
Good point. And plenty of people in the US still give dates “old style”, DMY.
...in April 19, 2009... Obama commented on a 90-minute diatribe that had been delivered by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega at the meeting the day before, and Obama suggested he was born in January 1961, three months before the Bay of Pigs invasion. Specifically, Obama rejected Ortega's attack on the United States for the attempted Bay of Pigs invasion during the Kennedy administration by explaining: "I'm grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old."Fifty seven reasons for doubt. :')
Yep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.