Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'No blood for oil' is the chant not heard
sfgate ^ | April 2, 2011 | Debra J. Saunders

Posted on 04/02/2011 8:46:40 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar

"No blood for oil" was a popular slogan chanted by the left in opposition to President George W. Bush's push to send U.S. forces into Iraq. Now that President Obama has authorized Operation Odyssey Dawn in Libya, I have been waiting to hear chants of "no blood for oil." I am happy to report, I don't hear them.

I went to the No Blood For Oil website; its lead item opposes efforts to strike wolves from the endangered species list. In fact, as NATO forces are lobbing missiles to enforce a no-fly zone over the country with Africa's largest oil and gas reserves, the nobloodforoil.org domain name is for sale.

With a Democrat in the White House, the anti-war corner has a much more civil tone. Anti-war House members have asked the GOP leadership to schedule an up-or-down congressional floor vote on the use of military force in Libya. A perfectly reasonable proposal. Congress should take its constitutional responsibilities seriously.

Now the Obama administration is in the hot seat - crushed between critics who charge the White House was too slow to authorize a no-fly zone and those who claim it was too rash in authorizing cruise missile strikes before notifying Congress. Hawks fear that Obama's promise not to put "boots on the ground" will embolden strongman Moammar Khadafy to fight to retain power. Doves believe that Obama went back on his no-boots-on-the-ground promise by authorizing a CIA presence in Libya.

Now, there are some smart questions to be asking the Obama administration. Who are the Libyan rebels? Are al Qaeda operatives or other extremists in their ranks? Can they win? Without answers, it is impossible to support any call to provide them with arms. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen opposes such a move; Obama said he wouldn't rul

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: antiwar; bloodforoil; cindysheehan; codepink; hillaryswar; justinraimondo; libya; nobloodforoil; quagmire; warforoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: ArchAngel1983

We may have to sacrifice much more as our founders
did. I am always inspired by the price paid for the
founding of our nation.

If I have to sacrifice all, be sure someone is going
to PAY.


21 posted on 04/02/2011 10:37:11 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kirk
"He has issues with the war but makes certain to never blame the US Commander and chief."
22 posted on 04/02/2011 10:43:15 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Impeach Obama & try him for treason / Homosexuals reject diversity / Unions finally caught for theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
>”Now the Obama administration is in the hot seat”<

The Obama Administration has never and will never be in the Hot Seat as long as 95% of the Journalistic community are Registered Democrats fulfilling the Progressive Agenda of their Master.

23 posted on 04/02/2011 10:52:27 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Conservatives THINK people are smart. Liberals KNOW people are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

No blood for oil for Europe! (could be my tagline)


24 posted on 04/02/2011 10:54:14 PM PDT by 38special (AK, CA, CO, NV, WA ... WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

25 posted on 04/02/2011 10:58:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

To reemphasize the same point: He blames the commander in chief directly and slams him constantly. Your claim that he only has “issues” with the war is simply wrong. He opposes firmly it at every opportunity. Perhaps you were thinking of the comparatively wimpy born-again antiwar politiicans like Newt and Hannity who seem to oppose only
Democratic quagmires.


26 posted on 04/02/2011 10:58:38 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
>I haven’t even seen their pictures on a milk carton.<
LOL, good one.
27 posted on 04/02/2011 11:48:17 PM PDT by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: garjog

Blood for oil is ok when progressives do it,see media.


28 posted on 04/03/2011 3:37:12 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Quagmire.


29 posted on 04/03/2011 5:39:07 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

——Quagmire.——

Meanwhile over at the Pentagon, Fagmire


30 posted on 04/03/2011 5:43:47 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

31 posted on 04/03/2011 5:52:01 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Even a suggestion that the Progressive-Left-Revolutionary media might be devoid of hypocrisy and double standards is laughable.

IMHO


32 posted on 04/03/2011 7:28:24 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArchAngel1983
Obama was the 'leftist revolution' and it's not working out all that well for them is it?

you're kidding, right? What initiative of their ideology that has been put forth by his administration hasn't been implemented?

do you think that he's been a failure simply because he's unpopular with his opponents? That's how it's supposed to be. Because its understood that he's an incompetent fraud? Even with that incontrovertible fact, neither he nor his sponsors' agenda has been slowed in the least. On the contrary, it has been greatly advanced. And the radical choreography on the street has been installed and fine tuned.

33 posted on 04/03/2011 3:03:00 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (You is what you am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
" you're kidding, right?"

Nope!

Look I'm trying to be a little optimistic here, OK.

There are three major groups of players out there; the right, the left and the ever so important middle of the road independents. Obama and his team of RATs will never lose the left and he never had the right, but now the squishy moderates are abandoning him by the millions. That's the good news.

The bad news is he has been very successful in implementing his agenda so far and it has been exceptionally destructive as you noted, but I believe it is coming to an end.

God, it's rough being a 'glass half full' kinda guy!

34 posted on 04/03/2011 5:25:10 PM PDT by ArchAngel1983 (Arch Angel- on guard / Still Think You're Free?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ArchAngel1983

My opinion is that the world you describe no longer exists.


35 posted on 04/03/2011 7:19:51 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (You is what you am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson