Comrades! Enjoy your new home in Siberia
1 posted on
05/15/2011 10:15:22 AM PDT by
Nachum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Nachum
What did they do to that guy in the Hanoi Hilton?
2 posted on
05/15/2011 10:17:27 AM PDT by
screaminsunshine
(Shut up and eat your Beans!)
To: Nachum
I wish McCain would just shut up and retire before he does any more damage.
3 posted on
05/15/2011 10:17:30 AM PDT by
Califreak
(You can't go swimming in a baseball pool)
To: Nachum
The RINO Mclaim. . . . .
I will believe anything.
4 posted on
05/15/2011 10:18:56 AM PDT by
DeaconRed
(It's bad when the President can't name all 57 States! ! ! ! ! ! ! !)
To: Nachum
6 posted on
05/15/2011 10:20:26 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: Nachum
This provides massive incentive for citizens to evade arrest.
7 posted on
05/15/2011 10:21:18 AM PDT by
Niteranger68
(Jared Lee Loughner - Disciple of Michael Moore)
To: Nachum
Apparently, McCain wants to extend Constitutional protections to foreign terrorists and eliminate them for American citizens.
To: Nachum
The Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010 Old news. This article is over a year old.
To: Nachum
I’ve come to the conclusion that it wouldn’t have mattered who won in the last election. McCain and Obama have way too much in common.
10 posted on
05/15/2011 10:22:51 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
To: Nachum; Travis McGee; Jack Black
Any politician who co-sponsors and/or votes to approve this legislation is a self-declared domestic enemy of the Constitution.
R2/CW2 anyone??
11 posted on
05/15/2011 10:23:57 AM PDT by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: Nachum
After destroying the 1st Amendment, it looks like McCain has the 4th and 5th in his sights.
12 posted on
05/15/2011 10:24:05 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(osama gets 72 virgins. We get 72 versions...)
To: Nachum
Let’s start with any Presidents, Senators or Congressman who propose or enact any laws or policies that violate their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution. And waterboard them daily, too.
13 posted on
05/15/2011 10:25:00 AM PDT by
sourcery
(If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
To: Bockscar; Arthur Wildfire! March; stockpirate; AvOrdVet; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; ...
Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) has introduced a bill that would allow the President to imprison an unlimited number of American citizens....indefinitely without trial. Known as The Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010, or S. 3081, the bill authorizes the President to deny a detainee a trial by jury simply by designating that person an enemy belligerent.Just wait until Obama declares all Tea Partiers to be "enemy belligerents."
FUJM!!!
14 posted on
05/15/2011 10:25:03 AM PDT by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: Nachum
Mr. McKeating appears to be an "enemy belligerent."
What now?
16 posted on
05/15/2011 10:25:39 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
To: Nachum
I'm pretty belligerent when it comes to Obama. Guess I better pack my bags.
To: Nachum
I loathe McCain and his daughter is a nut that didn’t fall any distance at all from the tree. (not an apple, a nut)
18 posted on
05/15/2011 10:26:36 AM PDT by
Shimmer1
(Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.)
To: Nachum
“simply by designating that person an “enemy belligerent.”
This is too much unchecked power for the president.
I can see the detention for terrorists, as the ones we captured in Afghanistan, etc., those who are in Guantanamo now — I can see a future need for “indefinite detention”, but that should be determined by some very clear criteria, by a military tribunal, or more, it most certainly should NOT be just at the decision of the president alone, or we will be in a dictatorship as soon as this becomes law, and we can all expect that “knock on the door” and indefinite detention — any criticism of the president could be defined as being “belligerent”, not as exercising our freedom of speech. Our Founding Fathers must be spinning in their grave.
To: Nachum
Comrades! Enjoy your new home in Siberia Make that ALASKA, once Sarah is elected.
Wouldn't it be highly ironic to see those Dems getting the persecution in real life, that they've been claiming in their deranged persecution fantasies all along...? /sarc>
Cheers!
23 posted on
05/15/2011 10:28:44 AM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Nachum
explicitly names U.S. citizens as among those who can be detained indefinitely without trial
No surprise that McCain would be supporting legislation that is constitutionally illegal.
And to think that the GOP nominated him as their standard bearer in 2008.
24 posted on
05/15/2011 10:29:55 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: Nachum
I thought this was the AZConservative satire at first!
25 posted on
05/15/2011 10:30:09 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
To: Nachum
26 posted on
05/15/2011 10:30:23 AM PDT by
TigerLikesRooster
(The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson