Posted on 05/31/2011 4:09:56 AM PDT by tellw
Park Police Investigate Arrests for Dancing at Jefferson Memorial By RUSSELL GOLDMAN
May 30, 2011—
The U.S. Park Police are investigating whether excessive force was used in the arrest of five protesters Saturday, who silently danced in the interior of the Jefferson Memorial to protest a recent ruling against dancing at federal monuments.
Videos posted to YouTube over the weekend show park police officers in light blue polo shirts handcuffing dancers. It looked as if one protester, who was wearing a "Disobey" T-shirt, had been body-slammed by an officer, and choked.
In a YouTube video of Saturday's incident, when a police officer asked the protestors which one of them was the leader, a member of the group pointed toward the statue of Thomas Jefferson inside the rotunda.
"I'll give you a warning," the officer said calmly. "If you come out here and you demonstrate by dancing, you will be placed under arrest. ... Does everybody understand that?"
Groups looking to protest at federal monuments are required to obtain permits.
Park Police spokesman Sgt. David Schlosser told the Associated Press Monday that the Park Police chief had directed the Office of Professional Responsibility to conduct an investigation into the officers' conduct.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Rights are rights, even for liberals and loonies. When people need permits to protest, something’s very wrong.
The problem is that leftist protesters tend to be violent.
By the time our side is violent it’ll be too late. :(
One of the quicker ways to change a law...when legislators become too sluggish or corrupt to do their job...is to break it and confront it in court.
Sometimes, you go on trial, and the law stands trial as well.
Really? what about this "rule?"
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Forgot about that one did you? Or do you just don't think it applies anymore as long as the GOVERNMENT is making rules.
BTW if you have to have a PERMIT then you're asking permission. If you have to ask permission and be granted permissionto do something, then you have not RIGHT to do that, you only have a PRIVILEGE. You might not like the protesters, but violating their rights is just as bad for the country as violating yours.
Well maybe they shot a dog later.
I wonder if picking your nose or scratching your crotch will get you body-slammed at the memorial? Maybe you have to do it repeatedly to get arrested?
I'm gonna guess the park police are there for security reasons, not to enforce Miss Manners rules of etiquette. So, how are you spotting the guy with the gun/bomb as you are arresting a group of inconsiderate, irreverent fools?
Let's see. If I were a fat, lazy, overpaid, gay, transgendered, foppish, park policeman, who would I rather deal with: A gunman, a bomber, or a group of fools?
I am not excusing the perps behavior in any way. Extremely disrespectful! But, these people do it for the attention, like children. Ignore them & they will go away. But if they persistent, get on your phone to your patriot friends & have an flash patriotic moment at the Mall. The morons will get the message quickly surrounded by 100 patriots.
But don't sing or dance. That might get you arrested.
(I must say that had I been at the Jefferson Memorial when I heard OBL was killed, I might have been arrested for dancing.)
I guess I'm one of those folks who is getting tired of having soldiers in a standing army ordering citizens around. Maybe you missed the part where one of those you call a punk asked this soldier to state under what authority he was acting? The soldier was clueless. I guess he was just following orders.
ML/NJ
Was the dog dancing?
Leftists need tasering.
>>Is it against the law to dance at the Jefferson?
I’d suspect that Individuals who happen to groove to their iPod wouldn’t be arrested.
The underlying problem in this instance is the coordinated provocative assembly - which was evidently manifested in order to garner a response from the police.
Meanwhile, other Individuals who were trying to experience the memorial were deprived of the ability to do so by this “Flash” MOB.
When Mobs deprive Individuals of their rights - then “IN ORDER TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men”.
[I guess I’m one of those folks who is getting tired of having soldiers in a standing army ordering citizens around.]
What would you rather have govern - the Republic, or The Mob?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.