Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nasa's mission orders come in: put astronauts on an asteroid within 15 years
Daily Mail ^ | 7/25/11 | Daily Mail Reporter

Posted on 07/25/2011 4:26:50 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears

With the space shuttle now history, Nasa's next great mission is so audacious, the agency's best minds are wrestling with how to pull it off.

They have presidential orders to to send astronauts to an asteroid in less than 15 years.

The challenges are innumerable, but many Nasa brains are thrilled to have such an improbable assignment - and believe civilisation may even depend on it.

An asteroid is a giant space rock that orbits the sun, like Earth. And someday one might threaten the planet.

But sending people to one won't be easy. You can't land on an asteroid because you'd bounce off - it has virtually no gravity. Astronauts couldn't even walk on it because they'd float away.

Reaching it might require a Nasa spacecraft to harpoon it.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asteroid; muslimoutreach; nasa; space; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
I wasn't aware there were Muslims living on asteroids.

Any way we could make that happen?

New Mecca or Something...populate it with virgins?

21 posted on 07/25/2011 4:40:53 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

22 posted on 07/25/2011 4:41:22 PM PDT by Adams (Fight on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hattend
If you’re going out to the asteroid belt, might as well go all the way to Mars

Yeah, especially since Mars is closer than the asteroid belt. The asteroids are beyond mars, between mars and jupiter. This obsession obama has with landing on an asteroid indicates a mind formed by bad hollywood fiction.

23 posted on 07/25/2011 4:41:58 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

An asteroid landing seems like an unnecessarily dangerous first step.


24 posted on 07/25/2011 4:42:40 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
Football field-sized solar panels would help, meaning the entire mothership complex would be fairly large.

Or, a small nuclear isotope reactor could do it at a 1/4 of the weight and complexity.

25 posted on 07/25/2011 4:43:48 PM PDT by hattend (Its a matter of public record that I did not go to Harvard Law School, but I can add. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend

Depending on the time of year, Mars is closer.


26 posted on 07/25/2011 4:44:07 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

>>Too big of a step. We should look at a longer stay on the moon first. Kinda pick up where we left off.<<

Asimov and Heinlein BOTH suggested a “Luna City.” They prompted many a child to become rocket scientists, engineers and inventors of things from Velcro to MRIs to GPS.

We owe it to ourselves to establish a city on the Moon — there is so much we could learn and do there and, silly as it may seem to those who eschew SF, to complete the initial vision of the Masters who inspired so many.

This whole “go to a asteroid” and “maybe go to Mars” is a (yet another) sop by barry the zero’s handlers. He doesn’t care about space. The only space he understands is the one between his ears that gets filled by his handlers.


27 posted on 07/25/2011 4:44:16 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
I wasn't aware there were Muslims living on asteroids.

No, but it would be a start.

28 posted on 07/25/2011 4:44:46 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
When Kennedy issued the challenge of the moon, he made sure to specify sending a man to the moon "and return him safely to Earth".

As they say about mountain climbing...."Getting up is optional, getting down is mandatory".

29 posted on 07/25/2011 4:45:07 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I think “landing on” is kind of a stupid way to go about it anyway.

A ‘fly by’ is much more feasible, useful, etc.

Reach out a sampling arm from a robot to get a sample off the surface - but don’t try to walk on it. It doesn’t have enough mass to keep you there.


30 posted on 07/25/2011 4:45:07 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I am thinking something along the lines of a Nebula Call Starship with gun rack and a whaling ship harpoon.


31 posted on 07/25/2011 4:46:29 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (As long as the MSM covers for Obama, he will be above the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

When Kennedy issued the chalenge to put a man on the moon “and return him safely to earth” it was because the USA had intel that Russia was close to sending a man to the moon- to die there.

They had many volunteers (space cowboys are like that) and not only was it horrifying to Kennedy’s morals but he knew if we issued that challenge Russia would NOT be able to keep up wih the safe return part of it.

That statement made sure we got there first.


32 posted on 07/25/2011 4:47:37 PM PDT by Mr. K (CAPSLOCK! -Unleash the fury! [Palin/Bachman 2012- unbeatable ticket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We should explore the ruins Richard Hoagland (sp?) says on the side of the moon turned away from Earth. Or has he stopped saying they are there?


33 posted on 07/25/2011 4:47:43 PM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Obamania in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Doh! You’re right. For some reason I was thinking it was between Earth and Mars.

Wasted a completely good snarky comment.


34 posted on 07/25/2011 4:47:43 PM PDT by hattend (Its a matter of public record that I did not go to Harvard Law School, but I can add. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
This is a matter of sending 'humans farther than ever before', said Nasa Deputy Administrator Lori Garver.

Duh, Lori... and to think, she is in management.

35 posted on 07/25/2011 4:49:28 PM PDT by hattend (Its a matter of public record that I did not go to Harvard Law School, but I can add. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc; KevinDavis
Why is an asteroid better than Mars? Wouldn’t Mars be easier?

Actually some of the asteroids out there would be almost easier to arrive at than going to the moon. Of course getting back might not be as easy.

Going to Mars would require a lot more than getting to an asteroid. Plus the expense of launching off of Mars for the return.

The point is there is NO POINT is sending a human to a big rock in space. You cannot land on it, or walk on it. Maybe you can haul it back and crash it into Mecca, I might support it then.

36 posted on 07/25/2011 4:49:28 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

LOL the moon is littered with robot heads.


37 posted on 07/25/2011 4:49:49 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
A permanent human base on the moon would, if done correctly, make enough money to more than support its continued operation.

Exactly!


38 posted on 07/25/2011 4:54:17 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Why is an asteroid better than Mars? Wouldn’t Mars be easier?

Mars is closer than the asteroid belt for one. We know more about Mars, its resources, its seasons, its orbit. A stepping stone to building a colony on Mars.

We know that lack of gravity has adverse effects on the human body.

Land astronauts on a asteroid sounds like another 0bama - Dr James Henson pie in the sky failure in the making without a long term plan.

39 posted on 07/25/2011 4:55:19 PM PDT by TYVets (Pure-Gas.org ..... ethanol free gasoline by state and city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Or, a small nuclear isotope reactor could do it at a 1/4 of the weight and complexity.

I don't think so. Thin-film PV arrays are both light and very simple. Thermoelectric modules powered by radioactive decay would be comparatively heavier and less efficient. Plus the containment vessel(s) itself. Power electronics would be required for both...
40 posted on 07/25/2011 4:57:07 PM PDT by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson