Posted on 09/02/2011 3:46:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill will investigate whether or not the student NAACP chapter violated UNC’s non-discrimination policy in dismissing senior Billy Thomas, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs Winston Crisp said.
On Sunday, members of the NAACP unanimously voted to remove Thomas, who is a segregationist, for his views on race relations. Billy had been a member of the group since his freshman year. “We are on notice that there is a question as to whether or not a student organization has acted in compliance with the policy or not,” Crisp said. “We take that very seriously and that will be investigated.”
Jake Templeton, general director of the group, said Thomas was not removed for his race (Billy is white) but for his opinions about segregation. He said the views clash with the ideology of the NAACP, which the organization’s constitution mandates members must uphold. “If we allow segregationists to remain members then we really cease to be a civil rights organization,” said Templeton. Another group member was quoted as saying “Duh.”
UNC NAACP is a student organization that receives student fees and is bound by the University’s non-discrimination policy. Between Feb. 17 and June 30, they received $152.20 in student fees. The policy states that groups may limit membership to those who share the beliefs of that group but cannot exclude members based on personal characteristics, including race.
“Our commitment to non-discrimination is bedrock strong but so is our commitment to the First Amendment rights of freedom of association,” Crisp said. “The non-discrimination policy for student organizations tries very hard to balance those issues.” He said if an organization does not comply with the policy, it must change or face losing University recognition.
“We’re going to take the time that is necessary to thoroughly investigate the issues before we draw any conclusions,” Crisp added.
Ernie Hoover, student body vice president, said he has asked the student solicitor general to prepare a legal brief and the student body treasurer to prepare a list of the funds allocated to the group. “We’ll be discussing how we want to respond,” Hoover said.
Jon Curtis, associate director of student activities and organizations, said the unusual nature of the situation makes crafting a plan of action difficult. He added that he has not received a formal complaint against the UNC NAACP.
Jake Templeton said he acknowledged that the University has the right to investigate any group on campus. He said he was worried that the decision has been perceived incorrectly.
“This isn’t a race issue, and it’s not NAACP saying whether or not Billy Thomas is a decent person and whether or not he needs to be ostracized,” he said. “I’ve gotten approached about that and that’s not the case at all. The decision was really about honoring the group’s constitution that the University approved of,” he added.
Terri Tucson, director of the UNC Rainbow Coalition said there was not enough information to know if it was a case of discrimination. “I feel confident that the University is going to do its due diligence in making sure that the policy was adhered to, and if they find that it was not adhered to they will take the appropriate action,” Tucson said.
Billy Thomas said he still enjoys a strong friendship with members of the group. He just wonders why he was excluded for his beliefs by a group that usually encourages inclusion. “Can’t we all just get along?” asked Thomas. “I doubt it,” Thomas added doubtingly.
“I’m especially appreciative of the willingness of the larger UNC community to openly engage in the dialogue and I trust there will be continued respect for all parties involved,” Billy added with a glimmer of hope in his eye. Lux Libertas. It must have been the light of liberty.
If UNC can investigate the decisions of this group to expel someone who is against what they stand for, what's to stop them from investigating a Christian group that expels practicing homosexuals or atheists?
At the same time, UNC gets tax dollars and can't allow "discrimination", and there is the freedom of assembly issue in the mix.
Doesn't a private club have a right to exclude someone--especially if he espouses views totally contrary to what the club stands for? How can you possibly have a campus club/group with any independence if the university gets to determine its membership policies?
I'd fight for the right of NAACP to exclude anyone for any reason it wants...
From the comments:
“I believe Dr. Adams is using this hyperbole to describe the actual account of Psalm100, a Christian A Capella group, asking one of its members to resign for openly embracing homosexuality. Bravo Dr. Adams for turning this situation on its ear. The group operates under a UNC “approved” charter and is exercising the right of any group to restrict its membership to those who conform to its tenets. PS- Psalm100 receives less than $200.00 in subsidies.”
As usual, Mike Adams nails it.
}:-)4
Well I am sure the ACLU wil join in sueing the NAACP over this.
Regardless of University funding - the group should not be allowed to use public property to hold their meetings. You know - like the Boy Scouts.
I was happy to see that my son’s high school has a prayer group that meets on school property once a week. But then I started to wonder, what if an athiest group wanted to hold a weekly meeting? Of course they’d be allowed. Then I was stumped. What would they discuss?
I am going to start a new organization, The National Association for the Advancement of Caucasian People! It will be known by the initials...mmm, that oughta fly like a lead balloon.
I don’t care whether they use “public” property to meet because “public” property should be open to the public, but no “private” groups should get “public” funding. They can just charge dues from their members.
Not to be too stupid here but how the heck did a white segregationist get to join the NAACP college chapter and apparently achieve some office with the group?
good question
CHRISTians, otoh are fair game for persecution...
im still wondering whatever happened to the united caucasian college fund...
Boy, I lucked out. I was about 20% of the way into the article. (I had no previous knowledge about the Christian a Capella group investigation.) Confused, I decided to “jump to the end” and read forum comments, like sometimes we all do. (not unlike reading the “joke” panel in a six-panel comic before you read panels 3-4-5)
Anyway, reading the comments clued me in well before I would have made the mistake of stating opinion about what turns out to be a satirical turned-on-its-ear re-telling of the events in the Mike Adams way.
Then I read the entire Adams piece. Made it all better....
I’ve known a _devout_ atheist. Would seek opportunities to argue against anything theological, subscribed to magazines promoting atheism, would display symbols in active opposition to religion & related memes, may have attended conferences on atheism, etc. It was indeed a way of life he was devoted to.
Yes, I was just as confused by it as you are.
I read your post and thought “Damn, someone with common sense.” Then I read your profile. OH—IO, and then I knew why. :-)
They threw a white segragationist out of the NAACP?
The boy is lucky they didn’t drag him behind a pick up truck.
:)
Aw, now I’m all teary eyed with self-congratulatory joy.
I got labelled someone with common sense. (Fist pump!)
Thanks, FRiend.
Why, they'd talk about people who attend the prayer group!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.