Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Anita and Rick Perry
1 posted on 09/02/2011 11:50:32 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Don’t know how I feel about term limits for the SCOTUS.


2 posted on 09/02/2011 11:52:28 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Perry is right.

It’s all well and good if we can always prevent a radical POTUS.

But this time, in 2008, one slipped thru.

Imagine a SC with nothing but folks like Kagan and Sotomayor ... sitting on it for life.


5 posted on 09/02/2011 11:54:42 AM PDT by library user (I want my headstone to read: "He died while doing what he enjoyed most: breathing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“Most lawyers would be against this,” said Laurel Bellows, president-elect of the American Bar Association. “If you are a strict constructionalist - which apparently the governor isn’t because he’s looking to amend the Constitution - you would have respect for the wisdom of the Framers.”


Utter crap. (The ABA is a leftist lawyer club).

Amending the Constitution is perfectly respectful of the framers.

The clear solution is to have 18 year staggered terms, with each Presidency nominating 2 justices, each Congress confirming one. Vacancies are filled by the sitting president to fill the remaining term.

Justices would be eligible for renomination.


6 posted on 09/02/2011 11:55:30 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Are you better off now than you were four trillion dollars ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
And what of the activist Federal justices, judges in the 13 Circuit Courts with appellate jurisdiction?

Lee was just confirmed to the 9th Circuit Court.

7 posted on 09/02/2011 11:55:45 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

THIS is how Rick Perry will self-destruct in this race, or as nominee. He just can’t shut his stupid mouth and act presidential.


8 posted on 09/02/2011 11:55:59 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand; tired_old_conservative; Lurking Libertarian

SCOTUS ping.

(I’m thinking of starting a SCOTUS ping if there’s enough interest. Anyone who wants on, freepmail me.)


9 posted on 09/02/2011 11:56:11 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

We need to review the last two appointments to the court. Seems that if you are going to sit there, you should AT LEAST be qualified.


10 posted on 09/02/2011 11:56:15 AM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
While I agree that the Courts should have a mandatory retirement age, Americans get awfully nervous when anybody, Left or Right, wants to mess with the Constitution.

This is an issue best left for after an election victory and after the American people feel comfortable with you.

12 posted on 09/02/2011 11:57:16 AM PDT by Polybius (Defeating Obama is Priority Number One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Every time someone tries to tinker with what is NOT supposed to be a living document there are always unintended consequences. There is a reason they aren’t term limited. We have enough political game playing for power. Now we’re going to have it with our Supreme Court as well. Even if WE THE PEOPLE aren’t voting there’s going to be plenty of greased palms to make the court nothing more than pay to play politicians. No thanks.

Cindie


13 posted on 09/02/2011 11:57:22 AM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It’s an interesting idea and I’d like to hear more about it before I make up my mind. One thing’s for certain, the SC has more power than it should and there were plenty of warnings about that at the time the constitution was created.


14 posted on 09/02/2011 11:57:46 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Not logical.

Conservatives conserve the Constitution.

What other RINO changes does he want?


15 posted on 09/02/2011 11:58:21 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction." Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

that will sound like a good idea until the day comes when we have four Conservatives coming up on Triple Witching Hour with a ‘Rat in the White House


16 posted on 09/02/2011 11:58:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I’d hate to lose someone like Clarence Thomas because of term limits.


19 posted on 09/02/2011 11:59:03 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (Palin or Perry, whoever is ahead in the delegate count on primary day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Only for lower courts, I am not sure about the supreme court.

I think some of the higher court justices should have a system of a “vote of no confidence” where if 66% of the population voates agaisnt them they get thrown out.

Think of it as a judicial “veto”.


20 posted on 09/02/2011 11:59:22 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

How about this?

Once a year, toss each justice down the marble front steps of the supreme court building. If they break a hip, they’re off the court.

;-)


22 posted on 09/02/2011 12:01:17 PM PDT by WayneS (Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm. -- James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I don't think it would solve anything..

take the last line of the article.."it's ridiculous to ahve octogenarians runnign the country..in power for 30-40 years>"..and complete it..

AND THEN, LIKE BRENNAN, RETIRE WHEN THEY CHOOSE SO A PRESIDENT THEY LIKE CAN APPOINT THEIR SUCCESSORS..

Brennan and Souter BOTH waited for a Democrat in the WH before resigning...had McCain won, they'd BOTH still be on the Court..

Would we want to deprive ourselves of another 5-10 years of Scalia, or THomas..I think not...

Did Perry mention his idea for number of terms, and number of years for each term?

Persoanlly, I believe the problem is in the district courts..where advocacy groups forum show..to find a federal district judge who is inclined to hold with their view, and issue the desired ruling and/or injunction..

25 posted on 09/02/2011 12:03:07 PM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Hey Slick Rick. All the red meat you throw at conservatives is pretty clever, but now I want you to face a real challenge, OK? If you are elected, will you absolutely close the border? Will you send all the illegals home, however many millions there are? Will you quit subsidizing them and their anchor babies at taxpayers’ expense? (No, because we already know your record on that in TX.) What is your position on “free trade” with China? What is your position on intervention in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, etc.? We haven’t heard a whimper from you on that, and that’s what being President is about, not hiding behind your “10th Amendment” rhetoric while the Left steals our country.


26 posted on 09/02/2011 12:03:40 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

He also wants to be able to overturn SC decisions by a 2/3 vote of Congress. Thats a two edged sword. I’d leave it be.


28 posted on 09/02/2011 12:03:59 PM PDT by RitchieAprile (breaking wind to the East..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
A better solution is for Congress to use its Article III Section 2 power to curb the courts. Scotus operates as if there is no check on it because Lefties and Rinos in Congress let it.

Three page pdf:

http://www.robertwelchuniversity.org/Lectures/RWU_Curb_the_Courts.pdf

29 posted on 09/02/2011 12:04:58 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Our Constitution is timeless because human nature is static.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Slick Rick was a happy, contented Demonrat while the SCOTUS judges appointed by his party destroyed the Constitution. Do you think we’re all a bunch of fools, Rick? Go back to Paint Creek, phony.


31 posted on 09/02/2011 12:06:24 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson