Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/19/2011 2:19:43 PM PDT by RobinMasters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RobinMasters

“she is squarely in the camp of conservative populism, opposed to corporatism and its corporate state.”

She is not of the Washington elite crowd and the main reason I support her. Also the main reason the RINO’s dislike her, Rove being among them.


2 posted on 09/19/2011 2:24:28 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.

ineluctable

3 posted on 09/19/2011 2:25:58 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
“Judging by her comments, she is squarely in the camp of conservative populism, opposed to corporatism and its corporate state.” -- Ralph Nader

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini.

IOW, Nader acknowledges that the Obama government is fascist & that Palin opposes fascism.
4 posted on 09/19/2011 2:26:50 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Ooh boy, how exciting, Sarah gets an endorsement from one of the most extreme anti-capitalist (a.k.a. communist), pro-Palestinian leftists in America.

If Nader likes Palin and what she is advocating, then I may need to re-evaluate the fact that I like her.
7 posted on 09/19/2011 2:35:17 PM PDT by Sudetenland (There can be no freedom without God--What man gives, man can take away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

How I wish she’d run. Maybe she’s thinking later, when the kids are older. If she won’t now, can’t blame her. But this is an opportune time, given the loser on the other side.


8 posted on 09/19/2011 2:35:50 PM PDT by HomeAtLast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rational Thought; kara2008; Immerito; Students4Palin; Ladysmith; EnglishCon; thouworm; ...

(((((PING)))))


10 posted on 09/19/2011 2:41:14 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Ralph’s right. Psychotic, but absolutely right.


12 posted on 09/19/2011 2:42:52 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

So they missed the whole “maverick”, “going rogue” thingy?


13 posted on 09/19/2011 2:49:24 PM PDT by Hugin ("A man'll usually tell you his bad intentions if you listen and let yourself hear it"--- Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Palin is smarter than some people think? I didn’t think that was possible around here. / bad humor


14 posted on 09/19/2011 2:50:39 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln (But that's just me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
Normally, I get squeamish when a leftist such as Ralph Nader makes positive noises about a conservative politician I admire, in this case Sarah Palin.

However, Ralph Nader, a lifelong leftist and a man who despises 'big business' frames his approval in terms that indicate he understands that although Sarah Palin is definitely conservative, she is not a believer in 'crony capitalism', where corporations give millions to politicians (in both parties) and expect - and receive -'access' and the passing of laws, usually tax-related, that favor these same corporations. That is not my idea of 'conservative'. We clearly need the corporations for employment and the supply of necessary goods and services but when they can avoid paying any taxes and generally receive favors smaller businesses can't obtain, that is a corruption of the political system. Palin understands this and, as president, with a Republican congress, would oppose it and put a spotlight on the deals politicians make with 'big business'. That would be beneficial and why the the Republican establishment, entrenched in 'buddy politics' oppose Sarah Palin.

Frankly, I never thought I'd be typing these words but here I am: Nader is right.

16 posted on 09/19/2011 2:53:58 PM PDT by Jim Scott ( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

23 posted on 09/19/2011 3:02:02 PM PDT by McGruff (Vetting - The process of examination and evaluation of a candidate's record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
I'm happy she's not in the primary right now.

Sarah Palin seems to be genuinely down home, someone just like us, yet unlike any other candidate, she also has real star power.

She would overshadow the others, especially Rick Perry, if she were to have entered the race in the last few weeks.

As things are, we can examine the current candidates' records and listen to their debate answers and form opinions based solely on them alone.

At some point soon, I hope she gets in.

I want to hear what she has to say and to see for myself if she has addressed the few negatives she had as a new to the big stage VP candidate.

But not just yet. Let Rick Perry have his moment alone. He and we deserve that.

And let the Rick and Mitt comparisons be made and voter opinions be formed first.

Then we'll be ready for her and I predict a very enthusiastic reception if she get in.

Like I said, no one has her star power and it hasn't dimmed no matter what the msm and company have thrown at her.

26 posted on 09/19/2011 3:05:30 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters; GBA; LibLieSlayer; Bigtigermike
Sarah is one of the most genuine people out there. Not afraid to go after crooked business that are in bed with the Government that want to ravage us out of house and home (G.E. comes to mind)

Sarah is building a true Bipartisan movement, like all great leaders do, even if not all are willing, The Commies can go to hell and the Beltway Republicans can either fight be her side or be crushed under our heel, but they will NOT stand in our way.

All I can say is.

GO SARAH, GO!!

31 posted on 09/19/2011 3:15:38 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If Sarah can't be elected in 2012, then Phase II will fall into place, may G-D have mercy on us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Run Sarah RUN!


37 posted on 09/19/2011 3:46:02 PM PDT by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

Every now and then a blind dog finds a bone.

Hey Ralph, don’t let it go to your head.


38 posted on 09/19/2011 3:48:40 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters
You've been hanging around the wrong people, Ralph.
39 posted on 09/19/2011 3:49:21 PM PDT by Savage Beast ("That is the great eternal question: Are 'Liberals' evil or stupid?" ~Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobinMasters

palin more intelligent than obama?

of course.


45 posted on 09/19/2011 4:01:06 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson