Why are there always rainbow flags at pro-abortion rallies?

Life Site News ^ | September 16, 2011 | ALISSA GOLOB

[NYer]

In January of last year, I appeared on Global Television talking about the blatant conflict of interest arising from the recent election of 21-year old Paul Marai, given that he was also an openly gay, homosexual activist, and his newly appointed Catholic School Board Trustee position. A few seconds (literally) after the interview was shown, I received an e-mail via Facebook entitled “F*%&$ Yourself”.

“Gain some rationality”, the author said. “You’re embarassing (yes, he spelled it that way) your intellect on TV. Learn a thing or two in school before you call homosexuality a disorder. You’re officially the joke of the public”.

Now, some of you might ask yourselves why I, a pro-life activist, would want to stray from my mandate to make abortion unthinkable, to take on homosexual activists. Scratch that: I know some of you are asking yourselves this question, because I ask myself that every time I receive such charming love letters such as the one written above.

The answer is simple. There is a link, an integral link, between the homosexual and abortion camps. Shocker, I know. It’s one that is deeply rooted, and as a 24-year old growing up in the era of Glee, Modern Family and Lady Gaga (to name a few), it must be addressed. So…who better than the girl whose job requires conflict on a regular basis?

It’s no coincidence that at this year’s National March for Life in Ottawa, the award for most-“ingenious” sign went to a pair of lesbians, who were ostentatiously showing “affection” holding two different card-board cutouts, one that said “I LOVE SEX” and the other, “I HATE LIFE”. Needless to say they were not there for the speeches. While the intention of this couple was clear, and their execution decidedly pedestrian, it was the actual content of their message that spoke volumes not only for them personally, but for the climate of the opposition.

Practically speaking, the pro-abortion and homosexual camps have far more in common than the multi-coloured condoms they shell out to whoever happens to be caught unaware. It is a well-known fact that the homosexual movement has a record of being staunchly pro-abortion. This includes very close social and political ties with pro-abortion powerhouses, including Planned Parenthood, which often includes financial support as well. It’s no coincidence that many pro-abortion activists advertise their solidarity with gay- friendly groups in an even more overtly public fashion.

Join a Facebook page dedicated to ending abortion here.

For example, we are all familiar with those charming ditties that pro-lifers are often faced with at various events and rallies, including the very inclusive, “Gay, straight, black, white! All unite for women’s rights!” And who could forget the chart-topping hit, “anti-woman, anti-gay, right-wing bigots go away”! While these heartwarming toe-tappers sound fairly tame, they, like our sign-toting sideliners at the March for Life, demonstrate the familial relationship between the two groups.

The question is, why?

An essential component of being pro-life is an openness to life. On an ideological level, homosexuality tends towards being individualistic; in a practical sense, profoundly sterile. Homosexuality uses sex as an instrument for self-gratifying pleasure, and cannot physically be used in the unitive and procreative way it was intended. When couples “mutually masturbate” for their own intensive desire, the procreative element is eliminated, thus becoming an inescapable rejection of life. With the rejection of life, easily comes the destruction of life, making it impossible to negate one without the other. Both camps strive for the acceptance of sex without consequence, thus aligning themselves with like-minded individuals. It’s a match made in heaven.

What is truly ironic is that those individuals militantly pushing for acceptance under the guise of “human rights”, have denied those same rights to the ones who need it the most: the unborn. It does not follow that a pro-lifer should celebrate “pride”, when that so-called “pride” is rooted in the erosion of the family and extermination of the unborn.

Now, I may have to learn a thing or two in school (such as exact and heuristic algorithms, Spectroscopy, astrophysics and quantum theory to name a few) however, the undeniable link between homosexuality and abortion: now that is something I’ve got in the bag.

[NYer]

Ping!

[chris37]

Symbol of the Army of the Godless?

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[reg45]

They like to pretend that they have diverse support.

[NativeNewYorker]

FWIW, my gay acquaintances are among the most ardent pro-lifers I know.

[heartwood]

I had a long lunch conversation with some men from the Pro-Life Association of Gays and Lesbians.

Their claim was that there was a political trade back in the seventies, the homosexuals supporting the lesbians’ abortion rights agenda in exchange for the lesbians supporting the sexual liberation/openness/gay rights agenda of the homosexuals.

If there ever is such a thing as pre-natal diagnosis for homosexuality (not likely) then things will get interesting.

[sodpoodle]

What a strange society we have become.

Lesbian sex means never having to say; “I’m pregnant” and the ‘Love that dare not speak its name’ means never having a ‘shotgun’ wedding.

All of that perversity should shut up about childbirth -it is not in their natural order. Of course, with surrogate mothers, sperm banks, abortion and adoption rights, their lifestyle is no longer an anathema to procreation.

Some careless hetero-sexual couple somewhere is creating a child that will become the plaything or adopted child of a homosexual lifestyle.

Heterosexual couples should avoid this chaos by marrying before having children and staying married after childbirth.

[SaraJohnson]

The hard core, man hating feminists are mostly lesbos. They hate the power and beauty of heterosexual love and family.

They have done a lot of damage to humanity in the name of women’s rights and interests. Liars and haters.

[gunnut]

Since they believe homosexuality is genetic, you would think that they would not be so in favor of abortion. With the advances in testing, the future could be aborting gay babies.

I don’t believe it is fully genetic so I don’t see this happening but if they believe it they should be looking at the slippery slope of the future.

[SkyPilot]

It is a direct perversion of God's symbol of hope, power, glory, and blessing.

Genesis 9:12-13 And God said, “This is the sign of the covenant that I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for all future generations: I have set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between me and the earth.

Ezekiel 1:28 ESV Like the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud on the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness all around. Such was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. And when I saw it, I fell on my face, and I heard the voice of one speaking.

Revelation 10:1 Then I saw another mighty angel coming down from heaven, wrapped in a cloud, with a rainbow over his head, and his face was like the sun, and his legs like pillars of fire.

Evil always perverts, distorts, and lies about Good.

Satan always attempts to twist God's glory for wickedness and corruption.

[RobbyS]

But not the lobbyists for gay rights.

[newzjunkey]

Ignoring their sides obsession with regulating all other aspects of life, leftist homosexual activists see "pro-life" as taking away liberty from the egg donor and kindred to their fight against sodomy laws.

They utterly ignore the child, or that they might find their own among the top of those aborted, if a prenatal test came available identifying them homosexuals in the womb.

[HotKat]

Kimo Rules: No rain, no rainbows. Would this make a good tagline?

[newzjunkey]

FWIW, my gay acquaintances are among the most ardent pro-lifers I know.

There are many who reject the group think of the activist "gay community." Unfortunately, they're often treated not unlike black conservatives: as traitors to their kind.

I've written a few times on FR about how that "community" is militant in demanding conformity. Reject everything else you are to be one of us; reject your faith, your values, your politics, your family…

Fortunately they don't get to everyone as you've witnessed.

[kearnyirish2]

Because the enemies of God have successfully separated the sexual act from reproduction.

[RobbyS]

A useful commentary about homosexuality and marriage.

http://www.firstthings.com/article/2011/09/whither-marriage-1

[Grizzled Bear]

...‘Love that dare not speak its name’ means never having a ‘shotgun’ wedding.

I wish the "love that dare not speak it's name" would shut the hell up.

[netmilsmom]

>>FWIW, my gay acquaintances are among the most ardent pro-lifers I know<<

Dollars to Donuts these are homosexual men and NOT lesbians.
If they are lesbians, they are beyond rare, in fact I would say that they are an anomaly.

Not a single lesbian I have known including my own sister is pro-life.

[muawiyah]

It's entirely likely there will be a pre-natal test available for homosexuality and a number of other conditions (some fatal, most not) caused or controlled by epigenetic processes (and/or methylation).

There's no doubt at all that virtually all homosexuals will be disposed of ~ or "the cure", whatever that might be, will be applied.