Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's Putin says wants to build "Eurasian Union"
Reuters via yahoo ^ | 10/03/11 | Gleb Bryanski

Posted on 10/03/2011 4:49:50 PM PDT by barmag25

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia's Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said he wants to bring ex-Soviet states into a "Eurasian Union" in an article which outlined his first foreign policy initiative as he prepares to return to the Kremlin as the country's next president. Putin said the new union would build on an existing Customs Union with Belarus and Kazakhstan which from next year will remove all barriers to trade, capital and labor movement between the three countries. "We are not going to stop there and are setting an ambitious goal -- to achieve an even higher integration level in the Eurasian Union," Putin wrote in an article which will be published in Izvestia newspaper on October 4. Putin said last month he would run in the March 2012 presidential election and his current public approval ratings show that he is set to win. Putin's initiative comes as Russia nears the end of its 18-year-old negotiations to join the World Trade Organization. In the article Putin made no secret of his skepticism about the global trade watchdog. "The process of finding new post-crisis global development models is moving forward with difficulty. For example, the Doha round (of international trade talks) has practically stopped. There are objective difficulties inside the WTO," he wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at ca.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: asia; communism; eurasianism; europe; europeanunion; putin; russia; sovietunion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/03/2011 4:49:59 PM PDT by barmag25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: barmag25

Say, maybe they should try a common currency....


2 posted on 10/03/2011 4:53:06 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

“Say, maybe they should try a common currency...”

LOL! (...because it’s working so well for the EU.)


3 posted on 10/03/2011 4:56:48 PM PDT by Ernie Kaputnik ((It's a mad, mad, mad world.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
So this would be like a Union of Socialist Republics?!?!?
4 posted on 10/03/2011 4:57:40 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If Sarah can't be elected in 2012, then Phase II will fall into place, may G-D have mercy on us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

I had a professor one time that said someday there will only be three or four leaders of the world. So....now we have EU, maybe another EU, the possible NAU (North American Union), UAE....who’s next? I wish this professor was still alive.


5 posted on 10/03/2011 4:58:15 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Dah! But what to kall this new ‘union’. Oh, mebe ve vill kall it USSR 2.0?


6 posted on 10/03/2011 5:04:25 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RC2

Like in Trilateral Commission?

http://www.trilateral.org/


7 posted on 10/03/2011 5:05:24 PM PDT by panaxanax (0bama >>WORST PRESIDENT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Dah! 2.0 because now ve have all the bugs vorking properly! Ha! Hahahahaha!


8 posted on 10/03/2011 5:05:40 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Hey, that’s kinda catchy! You could make it a little more folksy by spinning it as a friendly council of equals that’s in charge of a bigger institution. I think those are called “soviets” in Russian...


9 posted on 10/03/2011 5:05:40 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

The march toward the demise of the nation-state continues. It’s rather distressing when seeming nutcases like Alex Jones are shown to be right.


10 posted on 10/03/2011 5:11:29 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Cain 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
"USR" would sound so, I dunno... incomplete.

Plus, you know they have warehouses full of the old letterhead stationary and such.

11 posted on 10/03/2011 5:12:34 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

Note to Putin,
Been there done that,
Repeatedly Germany chooses to die rather than go that way.


12 posted on 10/03/2011 5:14:31 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

yes, comrade.

now that they have gas and oil to make a living.


13 posted on 10/03/2011 5:16:19 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: barmag25
I don't see it as a USSR 2.0. Putin and everyone there know too much about USSR to clearly see that it was a hopeless attempt. Lenin didn't know it in 1917, Stalin didn't know it in 1930, but everyone and their dog knew it in 1990's. Nobody there wants another USSR. What they want is another China - where the economy is capitalist but the political control is centralized and minimally influenced by the rabble.

What I see it as, though, is a European Union clone without the common currency. (I think € will not last in EU either.) The reason for that is clear. WTO is not willing to admit Russia, and the process is completely out of control (or is under control but not how Russia would like it to be.) So Putin is essentially taking the ball and going home, to build his own team and to play on his own terms. With India and China in tow he just may be able to do it. If Brazil joins too then it would be the end of WTO.

Another important item here is that this new union of his will consist of young, aggressive economies. These economies produce a lot and consume a lot; there will be plenty of trade. I'm sure the intent is to make this union into something that is more important than the WTO. Countries that are left overboard are Europe and the USA/Canada; these are largely mature consumption economies, with a smattering of high technologies. These countries are also largely post-capitalist, where industry is unwelcome, investments are foolish, and social equality is all the rage. In other words, these are countries that one would do well by staying away from.

14 posted on 10/03/2011 5:41:33 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

As Yogi Berra says, it’s deja vu all over again.


15 posted on 10/03/2011 5:43:19 PM PDT by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

>>>Nobody there wants another USSR. What they want is another China - where the economy is capitalist but the political control is centralized and minimally influenced by the rabble. <<<

In other words, what we used to call fascism.


16 posted on 10/03/2011 5:47:43 PM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

We have always been at war with Eurasia


17 posted on 10/03/2011 5:48:10 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (New gets old. Steampunk is always cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barmag25

Europe can be had for a song. This is your chance. Just step up and cosign, and you can run half the world.


18 posted on 10/03/2011 6:00:40 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; Charles Martel; ransomnote; ken21
Ah Yes, a Soviet Union of Socialist Republics, The SUSR!!! Wait....that sounds stupid!

The Union of the Republics of Soviet Socialists, The URSS, No...

Bah, I can't think of any more, What Putin Should do is create and Alliance with the Eastern European Countries, a Pact of some Sort.

Putin could then be some sort of First among Equals, a Supreme Soviet, if you will.

19 posted on 10/03/2011 6:25:31 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If Sarah can't be elected in 2012, then Phase II will fall into place, may G-D have mercy on us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: redpoll
In other words, what we used to call fascism

Well, let's see what the dictionary says:

dictatorial movement: any movement, ideology, or attitude that favors dictatorial government, centralized control of private enterprise, repression of all opposition, and extreme nationalism

Well, what do you know - you are right! :-)

But they still can do it and sell to their populations - just by using different words. In fact, you don't have to sell fascism to China, they are living it since days of Deng Xiaoping. India may remain democratic for a while (until another flurry of terrorist acts, perhaps.) Russia was living in fascist dictatorship since ... forever, probably; there is no record of slavs on Russian land not living under one ruler or another. That would be an easy sell.

The Fascism 2.0 will not have to be aggressive. Neither was the previous release; but Hitler just decided to get it all in one move - that's where he failed. If only he stayed within German borders (or perhaps with Sudetenland) and wasn't so fixated on Jews he'd die in his bed and be known as a great politician. Alternative history is interesting to me, I read a lot of it.

Anyway, Fascism 2.0 can be built (see China) and it can be successful enough, for a certain definition of success. Slavery was also "successful enough" - even for some slaves, especially in ancient times, not in the early USA. Back then, in Greece or Rome, slavery was just one of several fates that you could draw; and it wasn't the worst one.

20 posted on 10/03/2011 6:30:28 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson