Posted on 10/19/2011 5:36:50 PM PDT by Rudder
Freepers, not long ago I almost threw my TV at BOR for his glib dismissal of CAIN's candidacy. I steamed for over a week (and I still smoke abit).
Citing no data or reasons other than BOR's superior intellect and mysterious 'sense' of universal truth, tonight BOR shocked me...he slathered all over this in his opening: 'Talking Points, wherein he defended Cain's 9-9-9, and said Cain deserves serious consideration.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Almost orgiastic...I know the feeling.
Seriously, Cain is where it's at for Conservatives and the USA.
Rudder's Tip Of The Day;
Never trust O'Rielly,
especially when he panders to Conservatives...use him as a tool.
For directions and free manual, tune in at 11.
IOW, BOR is a weather vane...
Exactly.
People like my neighbor Larry love BOR. Larry is a Liberal.
Club for Growth isn’t conservative in any way, its Neo-Con RINO.
What do you think neo con means?
That's some nice circular logic there, Lurker.
It appears 9 years wasn't enough.
Cain/Newt or Newt/Cain. I really want to see Newt debate BO.
I just wonder how many other emails/calls he got.
And then to top things off Dennis Miller comes on a week later and says he is endorsing Cain.
Talk about putting your finger in the wind!
Perhaps I wasn’t clear enough.
I was just spouting off a little and trying to make the exact same point you did. IOW, agreeing with ya!
Guess I’m not to good at snark. Sorry.
And I agree with your second post as well.
I dunno.
I imagine there will be some people who agree with the endorsement and go with it and some who don’t and won’t.
Might it have some influence?
Sure. With some people.
There are already people on FR going on about what Mark Levin has said about the Cain 999 plan and using what Mark said as the basis for their argument.
I don’t see a problem with that. That doesn’t mean they are letting Levin “tell them what to think.” It means they agree with Levin and they are using him to BACK UP their arguments, not to lead them to their conclusions in the first place.
>> “What do you think neo con means?” <<
.
A morally depraved politician that rejects the traditional foundational points that define an American conservative, that wishes to pass of their squishy middle sellout position as “conservative.”
Examples: Bill Bennett, Bill Kristol, George W.Bush, George Will.
What process led you to that conclusion?
Their actions and the results thereof.
Can you be more specific?
999 will probably cost me 1 or 2% extra tax in years when I have no capital gains. But I can live with that. I do not want to be selfish like some other seniors, if 999 will benefit majority of people and even more important boost the economy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.